Biomedical subjects

Wolf Dieter Baumgartner

Publications and source records attributed to Wolf Dieter Baumgartner.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

Surgical considerations in cochlear implantation in children and adults: a review of 342 cases in Vienna.

CONCLUSIONS: Our data represent the experience of the largest cochlear implant program in Austria. In conclusion, cochlear implantation is a safe procedure, associated with a low rate of intra- and postoperative complications. Nevertheless, patients should be informed about possible problems and especially about the risk of a reoperation due to device failure. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the cause of deafness, the intraoperative findings and the complication rate for all cochlear implant operations performed consecutively between 1994 and 2003 at Vienna General Hospital. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Including all surgeries for bilateral implantation and revision, a series of 342 operations performed on 164 adults (age range 14.5-81 years; mean age 50.79 years) and 128 children (age range 0.75-14 years; mean age 5.00 years) was retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: The etiology of deafness was predominantly congenital or progressive (66.89%). The routine mastoidectomy approach was chosen in 300 patients (87.72%) and the suprameatal approach in 42 (12.28%). Intraoperatively, 4 children (2.53%) had a cerebrospinal fluid fistula and 35 patients (10.23%) showed cochlear ossification. Three adults (1.63%) and two children (1.27%) had facial nerves with an aberrant course. The overall complication rate was 12.2%, the rate of major complications was 4.97% and the rate of minor complications was 4.09%. There were no cases of either postoperative meningitis or facial nerve palsy. Both flap necrosis and electrode dislocation occurred in one adult patient (0.54%), but in none of the children. Formation of cholesteatoma was found in one adult (0.54%) and one child (0.63%). The rate of device failure was 7.07% for adults and 13.92% for children.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2004

Audiological performance after cochlear implantation in children with inner ear malformations.

OBJECTIVES: To prove that cochlear implantation is a beneficial method of rehabilitation in deaf children with malformations of the inner ear. DESIGN: The evaluation of auditory responses to speech (EARS) test battery was performed on the children in this study after an average implant use of 3 years. RESULTS: Individual results of six children with inner ear anomalies receiving cochlear implants are presented in this study. Three of the patients showed an incomplete partition (Mondini dysplasia), one had a cochlear hypoplasia and two suffered from an intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak. The majority of the children in this study are successful implant users. Wherever possible, test scores are included and subjective case reports given. CONCLUSIONS: Results are similar to those in children with normal cochleas, therefore inner ear malformations found in as many as 20% of patients with congenital sensorineural hearing loss are no contraindication for cochlear implantation. Nevertheless, factors influencing the success of implantation are multiple, including a thorough preoperative radiological examination, a well-performed surgery and an individually tailored postoperative rehabilitation programme.

Audiometry, Speech↗

PubMed2003

Effect of the loss of auditory feedback on segmental parameters of vowels of postlingually deafened speakers.

OBJECTIVE: The most obvious and best documented changes in speech of postlingually deafened speakers are the rate, fundamental frequency, and volume (energy). These changes are due to the lack of auditory feedback. But auditory feedback affects not only the suprasegmental parameters of speech. The aim of this study was to determine the change at the segmental level of speech in terms of vowel formants. METHODS: Twenty-three postlingually deafened and 18 normally hearing speakers were recorded reading a German text. The frequencies of the first and second formants and the vowel spaces of selected vowels in word-in-context condition were compared. RESULTS: All first formant frequencies (F1) of the postlingually deafened speakers were significantly different from those of the normally hearing people. The values of F1 were higher for the vowels /e/ (418+/-61 Hz compared with 359+/-52 Hz, P=0.006) and /o/ (459+/-58 compared with 390+/-45 Hz, P=0.0003) and lower for /a/ (765+/-115 Hz compared with 851+/-146 Hz, P=0.038). The second formant frequency (F2) only showed a significant increase for the vowel/e/(2016+/-347 Hz compared with 2279+/-250 Hz, P=0.012). The postlingually deafened people were divided into two subgroups according to duration of deafness (shorter/longer than 10 years of deafness). There was no significant difference in formant changes between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Our report demonstrated an effect of auditory feedback also on segmental features of speech of postlingually deafened people.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2002

The role of age in pediatric cochlear implantation.

OBJECTIVE: To document progress, benefit and importance of age in paediatric cochlear implantation. DESIGN: The EARS (Evaluation of Auditory Responses to Speech) test battery was performed on 33 prelingually deaf children at regular intervals up to 36 months following implantation. All children participated in individually tailored intensive audiological rehabilitation programs after receiving their implants. In this respect, it was attempted to evaluate speech perception scores in children implanted before and after the age of 3 in a homogenous group. RESULTS: All children demonstrated encouraging improvements over time in their speech recognition abilities. Furthermore, it was observed that the children who were implanted under the age of 3 achieved higher levels of speech perception performance. CONCLUSION: In order to shorten the process of central maturation of the auditory system, it is desirable to implant the children as young as possible. Early intervention seems to be the ideal strategy in enabling prelingually deaf children to derive maximum benefit from cochlear implantation.

Age Factors↗

PubMed2002

Does cochlear reimplantation affect speech recognition?

Although cochlear implantation has been proven to be a very effective method of rehabilitation for post-lingually deaf adults and pre-lingually deaf children, as electronic devices, cochlear implants are occasionally subject to damage or breakdowns. In these cases, reimplantation would be necessary. The aim of this study was to find out whether or not there are any negative effects on speech abilities after reimplantation with the same type of multichannel digital implant in the same ear. Seven patients were provided with a digital multi-channel cochlear implant. One subject suffered manipulative damage to the implant, and in six subjects an implant failure was observed. All reimplantations were performed on the same ear as the initial implantation. with the same implant type. Parameters such as insertion depth and number of active channels were the same in all subjects before and after reimplantation. Immediately following the revision surgery, three patients attained the same level of hearing that they had with their original implants. Three months following reimplantation, five subjects achieved almost the same scores that they had before reimplantation. The results showed that cochlear implant patients undergoing re-implantation can anticipate achieving nearly the same level of speech recognition as they had with their original implant. Nevertheless, patients need to be aware of potential problems before undergoing reimplantation so that expectations are not too high.

Aged↗

PubMedDate not supplied

The suprameatal approach in cochlear implant surgery: our experience with 80 patients.

The suprameatal approach (SMA) was first performed in 1999. It was developed for cochlear implantation as an alternative to the classic technique of transmastoid posterior tympanotomy approach. In the course of SMA the middle ear is exposed from the external auditory canal and the electrodes are inserted into the cochlea through a suprameatal tunnel bypassing the mastoid cavity. The goal of developing the SMA was to simplify the surgical technique, shorten the duration of surgery, enable wide exposure of the middle ear during the procedure, and avoid possible damage to the facial nerve and chorda tympani. We report here the results of 80 patients who were operated on using the SMA technique.

Adolescent↗