PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Won Hee Lim

Publications and source records attributed to Won Hee Lim.

5 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

Bone-implant contact at calcium phosphate-coated and porous titanium oxide (TiUnite)-modified oral implants.

BACKGROUND: Calcium phosphate (CP)-coated implants are usually referred to as having osteoconductive properties, whereas titanium implants with a native oxide layer are considered less osteoconductive. Often smooth titanium oxides (TOs) are compared to relatively rough CP structures. The objective of this study was to evaluate osteoconduction by comparing bone-implant contact at a relatively smooth, highly crystalline CP coating with a structured, porous TO (TiUnite)-modified surface. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten adult Hound Labrador mongrel dogs were used. Four titanium implants (Nobel Biocare) with CP-coated (2) or TO-modified (2) surfaces were installed 12 weeks following mandibular premolar and molar teeth extraction. The implants were alternated within and between jaw quadrants in consecutive animals. Mucosal flaps were advanced and sutured leaving the implants in a submerged position. The animals were injected with fluorescent bone labels at 3 and 4 weeks postsurgery, and pre-euthanasia to monitor progress of bone formation. The animals were euthanized at 8 weeks postsurgery and block biopsies were prepared for histologic and histometric analysis. RESULTS: There were no remarkable differences in bone formation and apparent bone-implant contact comparing the TO-modified and CP-coated surfaces. However, the measured average bone-implant contact was 71% and 57% (P=0.027) for TO-modified and CP-coated implants, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the TO surface exhibits osteoconductive properties exceeding that of the CP surface. One or several of the chemical and physical properties of the TO surface may result in the remarkable bone formation along its surface. This study indicated that crystallinity and/or chemistry may be important.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

Periodontal repair in dogs: gingival tissue occlusion, a critical requirement for GTR?

BACKGROUND: Design criteria for guided tissue regeneration (GTR) devices include biocompatibility, cell occlusion, space maintenance, tissue integration, and ease of use. Previous studies have established the importance of wound stabilization and space provision during the early healing sequel for successful GTR outcomes as well as evaluated biocompatibility, tissue integration, and clinical manageability of various biomaterials. The importance of cell or tissue occlusion has yet to be established. The objective of this study was to evaluate the role of tissue occlusion as a critical determinant for GTR outcomes. METHODS: Routine, critical size, 5-6 mm, supra-alveolar, periodontal defects were created around the mandibular premolar teeth in six young adult Beagle dogs. Space-providing expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) membranes, with (macroporous) or without (occlusive) 300- microm laser-drilled pores, 0.8 mm apart, were implanted to provide for GTR. Treatments were randomly assigned to left and right jaw quadrants in subsequent animals. The gingival flaps were advanced to cover the membranes and sutured. The animals were euthanized at 8 weeks postsurgery for histologic and histometric analysis. RESULTS: Three animals experienced wound failure within 2-3 weeks postsurgery resulting in exposure and removal of the occlusive ePTFE membranes. All defect sites, irrespective of membrane configuration or history of membrane exposure and removal, exhibited substantial evidence of periodontal regeneration including a functionally oriented periodontal ligament. To evaluate the biologic potential of GTR devices, only animals without wound failure and membrane removal were included. Alveolar bone regeneration for animals receiving occlusive and macroporous ePTFE membranes averaged (+/-sd) 3.2+/-1.1 versus 2.0+/-0.4 mm (p=0.3113). Cementum regeneration was enhanced in defect sites receiving the occlusive ePTFE membrane compared to the macroporous membrane (4.7+/-0.4 versus 2.3+/-0.2 mm; p=0.0167). Ankylosis was observed in one animal. Limited root resorption was observed in a second animal. CONCLUSION: Tissue occlusion does not appear to be a critical determinant for GTR. However, tissue occlusion may be a requirement for optimal GTR. Moreover, macroporous space-providing devices may increase the predictability of clinical GTR therapy.

Alveolar Bone Loss↗
PubMed2003

Periodontal repair in dogs: evaluation of a bioabsorbable space-providing macroporous membrane with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2.

BACKGROUND: Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) technologies have been shown to significantly support alveolar bone formation. Biomaterial limitations, however, have restricted the biologic potential for onlay indications. The objective of this study was to evaluate regeneration of alveolar bone and periodontal attachment, and biomaterials reaction following surgical implantation of a space-providing, bioabsorbable, macroporous, polyglycolic acid-trimethylene carbonate (PGA-TMC) membrane combined with a rhBMP-2 construct in a discriminating onlay defect model. METHODS: Routine supraalveolar periodontal defects were created at the mandibular premolar teeth in 9 beagle dogs. Contralateral jaw quadrants in subsequent animals were randomly assigned to receive the dome-shaped PGA-TMC (100 to 120 microm pores) membrane with rhBMP-2 (0.2 mg/mL) in a bioresorbable hyaluronan (Hy) carrier or the PGA-TMC membrane with Hy alone (control). The gingival flaps were advanced to submerge the membranes and teeth and sutured. Animals were euthanized at 8 and 24 weeks postsurgery for histologic observations. RESULTS: Jaw quadrants receiving the PGA-TMC membrane alone experienced exposures at various time points throughout the study. Jaw quadrants receiving the PGA-TMC/rhBMP-2 combination remained intact, although one site experienced a late minor exposure. Newly formed alveolar bone approached and became incorporated into the macroporous PGA-TMC membrane in sites receiving rhBMP-2. The PGA-TMC biomaterial was occasionally associated with a limited inflammatory reaction. Residual PGA-TMC could not be observed at 24 weeks postsurgery. Residual Hy could not be observed at any time interval. Regeneration of alveolar bone height (means +/- SD) was significantly increased in sites receiving the PGA-TMC/rhBMP 2 combination compared to control (3.8 +/- 1.3 versus 0.7 +/- 0.5 mm at 8 weeks and 4.6 +/- 0.8 versus 2.1 +/- 0.4 mm at 24 weeks; P < 0.05). Limited cementum regeneration was observed for PGA-TMC/rhBMP-2 and PGA-TMC control sites. Ankylosis compromised regeneration in sites receiving PGA-TMC/rhBMP-2. CONCLUSIONS: The bioabsorbable, space-providing, macroporous PGA-TMC membrane appears to be a compatible biomaterial for bone augmentation procedures. rhBMP-2 significantly enhances alveolar bone augmentation and soft tissue healing when combined with the PGA-TMC membrane.

Absorbable Implants↗
PubMed2003

Periodontal repair in dogs: a bioabsorbable calcium carbonate coral implant enhances space provision for alveolar bone regeneration in conjunction with guided tissue regeneration.

BACKGROUND: Collapse or compression of a barrier device into a periodontal defect or onto the root surface compromises outcomes following guided tissue regeneration (GTR). Bone biomaterials have been suggested to support regeneration of alveolar bone and to improve space provision with GTR devices. The objective of this study was to evaluate space provision, alveolar bone, and cementum regeneration following use of a bioabsorbable, calcium carbonate biomaterial in conjunction with GTR. METHODS: Routine, critical size, 5 to 6 mm, supraalveolar, periodontal defects were created in 5 young adult beagle dogs. Alternate jaw quadrants in consecutive animals received GTR and the coral biomaterial (cGTR) or GTR alone. The animals were euthanized 4 weeks postsurgery and tissue blocks processed for histometric analysis. RESULTS: The coral implant particles were surrounded by newly-formed bone or immersed in connective tissue and appeared to resorb and be replaced by bone. There was limited, if any, appreciable cementum regeneration. Space provision was enhanced in cGTR compared to GTR sites (6.1 +/- 1.6 versus 2.4 +/- 0.8 mm2; P<0.05). Bone regeneration (height) was significantly increased in cGTR compared to GTR sites averaging 1.9 +/- 0.6 and 1.2 +/- 0.6 mm, respectively (P<0.05). Bone regeneration (area) was 2-fold greater in cGTR sites compared to the GTR control (3.3 +/- 1.8 versus 1.4 +/- 0.5 mm2), however the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The coral implant significantly enhanced space provision for GTR while alveolar bone formation appeared to be enhanced by its use. Increased healing intervals are needed to fully understand the biologic value of the coral implant as an adjunct to GTR.

Absorbable Implants↗