Biomedical subjects

Won Mok Shim

Publications and source records attributed to Won Mok Shim.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Interference from filled delays on visual change detection.

Failure to detect changes to salient visual input across a brief interval has popularized the use of change detection, a paradigm that plays important roles in recent studies of visual perception, short-term memory, and consciousness. Much research has focused on the nature of visual representation for the pre- and postchange displays, yet little is known about how visual change detection is interfered with by events inserted between the pre- and postchange displays. To address this question, we tested change detection of colors, spatial locations, and natural scenes, when the interval between changes was (1) blank, (2) filled with a visual scene, or (3) filled with an auditory word. Participants were asked to either ignore the filled visual or auditory event or attend to it by categorizing it as animate or inanimate. Results showed that the ability to detect visual changes was dramatically impaired by attending to a secondary task during the delay. This interference was significant for auditory as well as for visual interfering events and was invariant to the complexity of the prechange displays. Passive listening produced no interference, whereas passive viewing produced small but significant interference. We conclude that visual change detection relies significantly on central, amodal attention.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed2006

Bi-directional illusory position shifts toward the end point of apparent motion.

In this study, we examined the relation between motion induced position shifts and the position shifts caused by saccades. When a stimulus is flashed briefly around the time of a saccade, its perceived position is mislocalized toward the saccade target: if the flash is in front of the saccade the test flash appears shifted in the direction of eye movement; but a test flashed beyond the saccade target is displaced back toward the saccade target (bi-directional saccadic compression: Ross, J., Morrone, M. C., and Burr, D. C. (1997). Compression of visual space before saccades. Nature, 386, 598-601. Motion induced position shifts (in the absence of eye movements) have been demonstrated for a variety of stimuli but the illusory position shift is always found to be in the same direction as the motion. However, all previous studies presented the tests either along or beside the motion path, never beyond its end point. We now test this region beyond the motion path and find that the apparent location of a test in this region is shifted in the direction opposite to the motion, back toward the motion end point. In contrast, when the flash was presented between the beginning and end of the motion path, it is shifted in the direction of motion, again, toward the motion end point. These shifts together indicate a compression of perceived locations toward the end point of the apparent motion. Control experiments confirmed that this effect was neither due to the Fröhlich effect induced by apparent motion from the test flash to the second disc nor to foveal compression. The correspondence between compression toward the end point of apparent motion and saccadic compression toward the saccade target suggests that attentional shifts or planned eye movement signals may play a role in both.

Form Perception↗

PubMed2005

Attentive tracking shifts the perceived location of a nearby flash.

Several studies have shown that the perceived position of a briefly presented stimulus can be displaced by nearby motion or by eye movements. We examined whether attentive tracking can also modulate the perceived position of flashed static objects when eye movements and low-level motion are controlled. Observers attentively tracked two target bars 180 degrees apart on a rotating, 12-spoke radial grating and judged the alignment of two flashes that were briefly presented, one on each side of the grating. Because of the symmetry of the 12-spoke grating, test flashes could be timed so that the rotating grating was always aligned to a standard orientation at the time of the test, while the tracked bars themselves, being only two of the 12 spokes, could probe locations that differed by multiples of 30 degrees ahead of, aligned with, or behind, the test bars. Despite the physical identity of the stimulus in each test--same orientation, same motion--the perceived position of the two flashes strongly depended on the locus of attention: when the test flashes were presented ahead of the tracked bars, a large position shift in the direction of the grating's motion was seen. If they were presented behind the tracked bars, the illusory displacement was reduced or slightly reversed. These effects of attention led us to suggest an attentional model of position distortions that links the effects seen for motion and for eye movements.

Attention↗

PubMed2004

The motion-induced position shift depends on the perceived direction of bistable quartet motion.

Motion can influence the perceived position of nearby stationary objects (Nature Neuroscience 3 (2000) 954). To investigate the influence of high-level motion processes on the position shift while controlling for low-level motion signals, we measured the position shift as a function of the motion seen in a bistable quartet. In this stimulus, motion can be seen along either one or the other of two possible paths. An illusory position shift was observed only when the flashes were adjacent to the path where motion was perceived. If the flash was adjacent to the other path, where no motion was perceived, there was no illusory displacement. Thus for the same physical stimulus, a change in the perceived motion path determined the location where illusory position shifts would be seen. This result indicates that high-level motion processes alone are sufficient to produce the position shift of stationary objects. The effect of the timing of the test flash between the onset and offset of the motion was also examined. The position shifts were greatest at the onset of motion, then decreasing gradually, disappearing at the offset of motion. We propose an attentional repulsion explanation for the shift effect.

Attention↗