PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

X Calvet

Publications and source records attributed to X Calvet.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2003

H. pylori eradication therapy vs. antisecretory non-eradication therapy (with or without long-term maintenance antisecretory therapy) for the prevention of recurrent bleeding from peptic ulcer.

BACKGROUND: Peptic ulcer is the main cause for upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage, and Helicobacter pylori infection is the main etiologic factor for peptic ulcer disease. Maintenance antisecretory therapy has been the standard long-term treatment for patients with bleeding ulcers to prevent recurrent bleeding. On the other hand, the precise efficacy of H. pylori eradication for the prevention of rebleeding from peptic ulcer is unknown. OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of H. pylori eradication therapy vs. antisecretory non-eradication therapy (with or without long-term maintenance antisecretory therapy) for the prevention of recurrent bleeding from peptic ulcer. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (the Cochrane Library issue 1, 2003), MEDLINE (January 1966 to March 2003), EMBASE (January 1988 to March 2003), CINAHL (January 1982 to March 2003), and reference lists of articles. We also conducted a manual search from several congresses. SELECTION CRITERIA: Controlled clinical trials comparing the efficacy of H. pylori eradication therapy vs. antisecretory non-eradication therapy (with or without long-term maintenance antisecretory therapy) for the prevention of recurrent bleeding from peptic ulcer. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Extraction and quality assessment of studies were done by two reviewers. Study authors were contacted for additional information. MAIN RESULTS: Six studies with a total of 355 patients were included in the first meta-analysis: mean percentage of rebleeding in H. pylori eradication therapy group was 4.5%, and in the non-eradication therapy group without subsequent long-term maintenance antisecretory therapy it was 23.7% (OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.37; there was no statistical evidence of heterogeneity; NNT was 5, 95% CI 4 to 8). Three studies with a total of 470 patients were included in the second meta-analysis: mean percentage of rebleeding in H. pylori eradication therapy group was 1.6%, and in non-eradication therapy group with long-term maintenance antisecretory therapy it was 5.6% (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.76; heterogeneity was not demonstrated; NNT was 20, 95% CI 12 to 100). Subanalysis. Excluding patients taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) at the time of recurrent bleeding resulted in a rebleeding rate of 4% (first meta-analysis) or 0.78% (second meta-analysis) in the group receiving H. pylori eradication therapy. When only patients with H. pylori eradication success were included, rebleeding rate was 1% in H. pylori eradication therapy group, and NNT decreased from 5 to 4. In some cases, recurrence of H. pylori infection seemed to be responsible for recurrence of bleeding. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of H. pylori infection is more effective than antisecretory non-eradicating therapy (with or without long-term maintenance antisecretory therapy) in preventing recurrent bleeding from peptic ulcer. Consequently, all patients with peptic ulcer bleeding should be tested for H. pylori infection, and eradication therapy should be prescribed to H. pylori-positive patients.

Anti-Ulcer Agents↗
PubMed2003

[Evaluation of a rapid test (ImmunoCard STAT! HpSA) for Helicobacter pylori detection in stools].

INTRODUCTION: The use of a rapid diagnostic technique may be extremely useful for the management of Helicobacter pylori infection. A new immunochromatographic in-office test (ImmunoCard STAT! HpSA, Meridian Diagnosis Inc, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA) for the detection of H. pylori in feces has recently become available. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the diagnostic reliability and reproducibility of the ImmunoCard STAT! HpSA test in patients with dyspepsia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-three dyspeptic patients were enrolled. H. pylori status was determined by CLO-test and Giemsa staining of antral biopsy. Patients with a positive result for both tests were considered infected and those with a negative result for both tests were considered not infected. Fecal H. pylori antigen was tested twice by ImmunoCard STAT! HpSA. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of each determination were calculated. The concordance between the two determinations was evaluated using Kappa statistics. RESULTS: Of the 63 patients, 46 were infected by H. pylori. Sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values were 89-91%, 86-93%, 96-98% and 72-75%, respectively. The correlation coefficient between determinations was 0.845. CONCLUSION: The new ImmunoCard STAT! HpSA test shows good sensitivity and reproducibility. Therefore, it could be highly useful in the management of H. pylori infection.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

[Management of dyspepsia, gastroduodenal ulcer and Helicobacter pylori infection in primary care].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate management of dyspepsia, gastroduodenal ulcer and Helicobacter pylori infection in the setting of family practice. DESIGN: An observational transversal study was performed. An anonymous questionnaire was send by mail between January and October 2000. SETTING: Primary care. PARTICIPANTS: Physicians of 17 Primary Care centers. RESULTS: Sixty-four per cent of the physicians returned the answered questionnaire (107/165). Primary care doctors reported they had indicated eradication therapy at least once during last year in 94.3%; 89.7% usually indicate H. pylori eradication for duodenal ulcer and 70.1% for gastric ulcer. The main method for the study of dyspepsia was endoscopy associated with antral histology or rapid urease test for determination of H. pylori status. Omeprazole, clarithromycin and amoxicillin twice daily for seven days was the preferred eradication therapy (77.6%). Forty-five percent of physicians systematically tested patients to confirm cure of the infection; 36.4% tested patients only if symptoms relapsed. Breath test (72.7%) was the preferred method to confirm eradication. Physicians with postgraduate specialty in Family Care and Community Medicine (MFyC) demand less often gastroenterologist evaluation, indicate less frequently upper tract radiology, use more often C13 urea breath test for diagnosis and indicate more often eradication treatment for erosive duodenitis than unspecialised family doctors. CONCLUSIONS: Management of dyspepsia and H. pylori infection in Primary Care in our area is reasonably adapted to current consensus recommendations. Many differences in management were observed between MFyC and non-specialised primary care physicians.

Amoxicillin↗
PubMed2002

Single vs. double dose of a proton pump inhibitor in triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Triple therapies combining a double dose of proton pump inhibitor plus two antibiotics are the standard treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection. Some reports suggest that the use of half the dose of proton pump inhibitor is equally effective. AIM: To compare the efficacy of a single vs. double dose of proton pump inhibitor in triple therapy. METHODS: We conducted a MEDLINE search. The search strategy included the words (pylori) AND (triple, PPI, proton pump, omeprazole, rabeprazole, pantoprazole, lansoprazole, clarithromycin, amoxicillin, amoxycillin or metronidazole). Abstracts of the articles obtained and papers presented at the European Helicobacter pylori Study Group and American Gastroenterological Association congresses from 1996 to 2001 were examined. Inclusion criteria were: (i) randomized studies with at least two branches of triple therapy including a proton pump inhibitor and two standard antibiotics; (ii) branches could differ only in terms of proton pump inhibitor dosage. A meta-analysis was conducted using conventional shareware (Review Manager 4.1). RESULTS: Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria with a total of 2391 patients. Cure rates with double doses of proton pump inhibitor were higher in both the intention-to-treat analysis (83.9% vs. 77.7%; Peto odds ratio, 1.51; 95% confidence interval, 1.23-1.85; P < 0.01) and per protocol analysis (89% vs. 81%; Peto odds ratio, 1.96; 95% confidence interval, 1.55-2.47; P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Triple therapies containing a single dose of proton pump inhibitor are less effective than those containing a standard double dose of proton pump inhibitor.

2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles↗
PubMed2002

One-week triple vs. quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection - a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Seven-day triple therapy including omeprazole, clarithromycin and amoxicillin has become the treatment of choice for Helicobacter pylori infection. However, 7 days of classical quadruple therapy combining omeprazole, tetracycline, metronidazole and bismuth may be an alternative to triple therapy. AIM: To compare triple vs. quadruple therapy for H.pylori eradication. METHODS: Three hundred and thirty-nine patients with peptic ulcer and H. pylori infection were included in the study. Patients were randomized to receive omeprazole, 20 mg, amoxicillin, 1 g, and clarithromycin, 500 mg, all b.d., or omeprazole, 20 mg b.d., tetracycline chloride, 500 mg, metronidazole, 500 mg, and bismuth subcitrate, 120 mg, all t.d.s. Cure was defined as a negative urea breath test at least 2 months after treatment. RESULTS: Per protocol and intention-to-treat cure rates were 86%[95% confidence interval (CI), 80-91%] and 77% (95% CI, 70-83%) for triple therapy, and 89% (95% CI, 82-93%) and 83% (95% CI, 76-88%) for quadruple therapy. No significant differences between the groups were found in the cure rates, compliance or side-effects. CONCLUSION: One-week triple and quadruple therapy show similar results when used as first-line eradication treatment.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Evaluation of Helicobacter pylori diagnostic methods in patients with liver cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori-associated peptic ulcer is a frequent complication in cirrhotic patients and its morbidity rate is high. In spite of this, diagnostic methods for H. pylori infection have not been fully evaluated in these patients. AIM: To evaluate H. pylori diagnostic methods in patients with liver cirrhosis. METHODS: One hundred and one cirrhotic patients were included in the study. Three antral and two corpus biopsies were obtained for rapid urease test of the antral mucosa, and Giemsa stain and immunohistochemistry were performed for both the corpus and antrum. Serology, 13C-urea breath test and faecal H. pylori antigen determination were also carried out. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients were positive and 35 were negative for H. pylori infection; four were indeterminate. The sensitivity and specificity were 90.4% and 100%, respectively, for antral histology, 100% and 100% for gastric body histology, 90.4% and 100% for antral immunohistochemistry, 96.2% and 96.7% for body immunochemistry, 85.7% and 97% for rapid urease test, 83.6% and 55.9% for serology, 96.4% and 97.1% for 13C-urea breath test and 75.4% and 94.1% for faecal antigen. CONCLUSION: The most reliable tests for H. pylori infection in cirrhotic patients were the 13C-urea breath test and gastric body histology.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Helicobacter pylori does not play a part in the dyspeptic complaints of rheumatology patients receiving long term treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

BACKGROUND: The presence of dyspeptic symptoms is a common finding in patients treated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Some studies seem to support the involvement of Helicobacter pylori infection in the dyspeptic symptoms reported by these patients, and suggest that eradication may be useful. OBJECTIVE: To determine the variables related to dyspepsia in rheumatology patients requiring NSAID treatment, assessing in particular the role of Helicobacter pylori infection. METHODS: One hundred and eighty six consecutive patients with a rheumatological disorder requiring NSAID treatment (68 male, 118 female; mean (SD) age 55 (15) years) were included in a cross sectional study; dyspeptic symptoms were measured by a previously validated scale. Helicobacter pylori infection was determined by serology. Variables related to the severity of symptoms and the need for antisecretory drugs were determined by multivariate analysis. RESULTS: No relation was found between Helicobacter pylori infection and dyspepsia or any of its surrogate markers (antisecretory drug use or NSAID intolerance). Female sex and treatment with antisecretory drugs were found to be independent predictors for the appearance and severity of dyspeptic symptoms. The only independent predictive variables of the requirement for antisecretory drugs were age, previous ulcer disease, taking NSAIDs with a medium or high anti-inflammatory potential, and the symptoms score. CONCLUSION: Helicobacter pylori infection does not seem to play any part in the gastric symptoms of patients treated long term with NSAIDs.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal↗
PubMed2001

Modified seven-day, quadruple therapy as a first line Helicobacter pylori treatment.

BACKGROUND: Cure rates of 7-day triple therapy seem to be decreasing. Quadruple therapies may be an alternative, although their complex administration makes patient acceptance difficult. OBJECTIVE: To test the usefulness of a thrice a day, quadruple therapy to cure Helicobacter pylori infection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 122 consecutive patients with peptic ulcer and Helicobacter pylori infection were treated with omeprazole 20 mg b.d., tetracycline chlorhydrate 500 mg t.d.s., metronidazole 500 mg t.d.s., and bismuth subcitrate 120 mg t.d.s. administered with meals for 7 days. Cure was tested by either endoscopy or breath test after 2 months, and by urea breath test 6 months after therapy. RESULTS: Seven patients were lost to follow-up. Of the remaining 115, 110 were cured at the first control, giving an intention-to-treat cure rate of 90.2% (95% CI: 83-95%) and a per protocol cure rate of 95.7% (95% CI: 90-98%). One hundred three patients returned for a 6-month breath test; all but one were cured. Side-effects were minimal or minor in 47 patients (40.8%) and moderate in four (3.4%). Compliance was good, 95% of patients taking more than 90% of the pills. Six (5%) patients stopped treatment after 1, 2, 4 (two patients) and 6 (two patients) days. CONCLUSION: Thrice a day quadruple therapy shows excellent cure rates, far above 90%, is well-tolerated and compliance is easy. Head-to-head comparison with triple therapies as first line Helicobacter pylori treatment seems warranted.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2001

Proton pump inhibitors versus H2-antagonists: a meta-analysis of their efficacy in treating bleeding peptic ulcer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether proton pump inhibitors are more effective than H2-antagonists (H2-A) for the treatment of bleeding peptic ulcer. DATA SOURCES: PubMed database until January 2000. STUDY SELECTION: Comparative randomized trials of proton pump inhibitors (omeprazole, lansoprazole, or pantoprazole) vs. H2-A (cimetidine, ranitidine or famotidine). DATA EXTRACTION: Meta-analysis combining the odds ratios (OR) of the individual studies in a global OR (Peto method). OUTCOMES EVALUATED: Persistent or recurrent bleeding, need for surgery, or mortality. DATA SYNTHESIS: Eleven studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and contained data for at least one of the planned comparisons. Persistent or recurrent bleeding was reported in 6.7% (95% CI: 4.9-8.6%) of the patients treated with proton pump inhibitors, and in 13.4% (95% CI: 10.8-16%) of those treated with H2-A (OR 0.4; 95% CI: 0.27-0.59) (chi2-homogeneity test, 18; P=0.09). Surgery was needed in 5.2% (95% CI: 3.4-6.9%) of the patients treated with proton pump inhibitors, and in 6.9% (95% CI: 4.9-8.9%) of the patients treated with H2-A (OR 0.7; 95% CI: 0.43-1.13). Respective percentages for mortality were 1.6% (95% CI: 0.9-2.9%) and 2.2% (95% CI: 1.3-3.7%) (OR 0.69; 95% CI: 0.31-1.57). SUB-ANALYSIS: Five studies evaluated the effect of both therapies given in bolus injections on persistent or recurrent bleeding rate, which was 6% (95% CI: 3.6-8.3%) and 8.1% (95% CI: 5.3-10.9%), respectively (OR, 0.57; 95% CI: 0.31-1.05). Persistent or recurrent bleeding in high risk patients (Forrest Ia, Ib and IIa) occurred in 13.2% (95% CI: 7.9-8%) of the patients treated with proton pump inhibitors and in 34.5% (27-42%) of those treated with H2-A (OR 0.28; 95% CI: 0.16-0.48). In patients not having endoscopic therapy, persistent or recurrent bleeding was reported, respectively, in 4.3% (95% CI: 2.7-6.7%) and in 12% (95% CI: 8.7-15%) (OR 0.24; 95% CI: 0.13-0.43). Less marked differences were observed in patients having adjunct endoscopic therapy: 10.3% (95% CI: 6.7-13.8%) and 15.2% (11.1-19.3%) (OR 0.59; 95% CI: 0.36-0.97). Moreover, the significance disappeared in this group when a single outlier study was excluded. CONCLUSIONS: Proton pump inhibitors are more effective than H2-A in preventing persistent or recurrent bleeding from peptic ulcer, although this advantage seems to be more evident in patients not having adjunct sclerosis therapy. This beneficial effect seems to be similar or even more marked in patients with Forrest Ia, Ib or IIa ulcers. However, proton pump inhibitors are not more effective than H2-A for reducing surgery or mortality rates. Nevertheless, the data are too scarce and heterogeneous to draw definitive conclusions, and further comparative trials are clearly warranted.

Anti-Ulcer Agents↗
PubMed2001

What is the optimal length of proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapies for H. pylori? A cost-effectiveness analysis.

BACKGROUND: Triple therapy with a proton pump inhibitor, clarithromycin and amoxicillin is widely used for H. pylori infection. The appropriate length of treatment remains controversial. AIM: To determine whether length of treatment has an impact on the cost-effectiveness of triple therapy. METHODS: The study took the form of a cost-effectiveness analysis spanning 2 years. The perspective was societal and the setting, ambulatory care. Subjects were Helicobacter pylori-positive patients with a duodenal ulcer. The triple therapy trials spanned 7, 10 or 14 days and the main outcome measures were cost per patient and marginal cost for additional cured patient calculated for a low cost-of-care setting (Spain), for a high-cost setting (USA), and for two follow-up strategies: (i) systematic 13C-urea breath test after eradication; (ii) clinical follow-up, breath-test if symptoms recurred. RESULTS: Base-case analysis showed that for both the 13C-UBT and the clinical follow-up branches, lowest costs were obtained with 7-day schedules both in Spain and the USA. Sensitivity analysis showed that in Spain, 10-day therapies would have to increase 7-day cure rates by 10-12% to become cost-effective. In contrast, in the USA only a 3-5% increase was needed. The corresponding figures for 14-day therapy were 25-35% and 8-11%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Seven-day therapies seem the most cost-effective strategy. However, in high-cost areas the differences were less evident.

Amoxicillin↗
PubMed2001

Idiopathic pylephlebitis and idiopathic sclerosing peritonitis in a man with protein S deficiency.

Idiopathic pylephlebitis and primary sclerosing peritonitis are two highly unusual entities. To our knowledge, the association of the two diseases has not been described previously. We report a 42-year-old patient with a protein S deficiency who presented with fever and chills, in whom idiopathic pylephlebitis was diagnosed. A year later, the patient was readmitted because of recurrent vomiting and weight loss. An exploratory laparotomy yielded diagnosis of sclerosing peritonitis, which resolved after surgery. The short time interval between the processes suggests that they were related to each other, and also to the protein S deficiency.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori after triple therapy in uncomplicated duodenal ulcers--a cost-effectiveness analysis.

BACKGROUND: The cost-effectiveness of determining Helicobacter pylori status after treatment remains to be established. AIM: To determine the benefit of post-treatment assessment of H. pylori eradication in patients with uncomplicated duodenal ulcer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A decision analysis was performed in patients with uncomplicated duodenal ulcer who were H. pylori-positive and had received eradication therapy. A decision tree was devised to compare the costs per patient of two different strategies: (a) systematic performance of post-treatment urea breath test and new treatment if positive; and (b) clinical follow-up, 13C-urea breath test if dyspeptic symptoms recurred and eradication treatment if the test was positive. RESULTS: Post-eradication 13C-urea breath test was notably more expensive than clinical follow-up, both in a low-cost per care setting (197 vs. 132 Euros) and in a high-cost per care (614 vs. 340 US $) scenario. This conclusion remained stable for a wide range of variations of the variables included in the decision tree (e.g. cure rates of eradication treatment, cost of the urea breath test or sensitivity, and specificity of urea breath test to detect eradication). CONCLUSION: In patients with uncomplicated duodenal ulcer, evaluation of eradication after H. pylori treatment markedly increases costs with no clear improvement in results and therefore should not be performed routinely.

Breath Tests↗