PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

X Pivot

Publications and source records attributed to X Pivot.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

[Cost effectiveness of Ligasure Precise versus surgical clips during axillary nodal dissection for breast cancer].

UNLABELLED: Introduction. The techniques used for axillary node dissection are constantly evolving. The advent of the grip Ligasure Precise raise the question of its cost-effectiveness compared with surgical clips. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of Ligasure compared with surgical clips for simple axillary node dissection or Patey procedure in terms of duration of drainage, cost of hospitalization and complications. MATERIAL: and method. Retrospective study extending from January 1, 2003 to December 31, 2004, concerning 187 patients who underwent simple axillary dissection (100) or Patey procedure (87), with use of surgical clips or Ligasure followed by drainage. RESULTS: The use of Ligasure increased the operative cost because its price is higher than that of a clip grip with a refill. Ligasure significantly decreased the duration of drainage in the two groups but there was significantly more abundant fluid loss in the dissection group. The cost of hospitalization related to the choice of the technique of hemostasis (cost of the material + lasted of drainage X price of the day of hospitalization), was not significantly favor of Ligasure. Taking into account the choice of the hemostasis technique and the total duration of hospitalization (material cost + duration of hospitalization X price of the day of hospitalization), there is no significant difference between the two groups. CONCLUSION: This study compares grip Ligasure Precise with surgical clips for axillary dissection. The duration of drainage was significantly shorter with Ligasure Precise but its benefit in terms of fluid loss remains to be shown. The use of Ligasure does not significantly reduce the cost of hospitalization.

Axilla↗
PubMed2005

Molecularly targeted agents: their promise as cancer chemopreventive interventions.

Molecular medicine has fully entered in to the oncology arena. The development of targeted therapies is one of the major ongoing efforts in cancer treatment. Targeted therapy refers to treatment strategies directed against molecular targets considered to be involved in neoplastic transformation. Such molecularly targeted agents (MTA) are currently under study in all treatment settings including that of chemoprevention, defined as the use of natural or synthetic agents to interrupt the carcinogenic process, to nip tumours in the bud. This review article aims to provide a general overview of the potential use of some of these MTA in the chemoprevention setting.

Angiogenesis Inhibitors↗
PubMed2004

Results of a randomised phase II study comparing docetaxel with methotrexate in patients with recurrent head and neck cancer.

We report the results of a randomised phase II trial of docetaxel tested as a single agent in patients with recurrent head and neck cancer using methotrexate as a control arm to validate the results. Eligibility criteria included: histologically-confirmed squamous cell carcinoma, measurable disease, adequate haematological, renal and hepatic functions, no prior chemotherapy for recurrent cancer, signed informed consent. 40 mg/m2 methotrexate was given as a short weekly bolus i.v. injection, and 40 mg/m2 docetaxel was administered as a one hour weekly infusion. A total of 57 patients were randomised based on a ratio of 2/1:37 and 20 patients received docetaxel and methotrexate, respectively. Patient characteristics included 49 males and 8 females; the median age was 59 years (range: 43-82 years). Twenty-eight patients had a local-regional relapse and 29 had distant metastasis, the median disease-free interval was 7.9 months (range: 0-165 months). For patients treated with docetaxel, the following grade 3-4 toxicities occurred: neutropenia (12.5%) with febrile neutropenia in one patient (1%), anaemia (19%) mucositis (9%) and ungueal toxicity (9%). In the methotrexate arm, the grade 3-4 toxicities were: anaemia (15%) and mucositis (5%). The response rate was significantly higher in the docetaxel arm with 27% (95% confidence interval (CI): 21.7-32.3%) of objective responses versus 15% (95% CI: 11.2-18.8%) in the methotrexate arm. Overall survival and time to progression were super-imposable between the docetaxel and methotrexate treatments. Docetaxel given as a weekly infusion has a high activity in patients with head and neck cancer. A phase III trial is needed to test if this translates into a survival benefit for docetaxel use.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Liver metastases from head and neck squamous cell carcinomas: radiological and biological features.

BACKGROUND: Liver metastases from head and neck cancer are rare (4.4%) and associated with a poor prognosis (median survival 4 months). The objective of the present study was to evaluate the radiological and biological features of liver metastases from head and neck (H and N) squamous cell carcinomas in 24 patients among 550 recurrent H and N cancer patients in our data bank. RESULTS: At first presentation of liver nodules, liver enzyme levels (LEL) were found to be abnormal in 46% of patients (n = 11). Ultrasound features included miscellaneous presentations such as hypoechogenic (n = 21), hyperechogenic hemangioma-like lesions (n = 2), owl's eye (n = 2) or cyst-like liver nodules (n = 3). Hepatomegaly was present in 48% of the cases without any sign of portal hypertension and without any ascites. 1 month before death, all patients presented with abnormal LEL. Liver imaging showed an increase of 1.8x in size and of 2x in number of the tumor nodules. Hepatomegaly was present in 54%. Little ascites appeared in 2 cases, with no evidence of portal hypertension or liver insufficiency. Median disease-free interval and overall survival from recurrence were 10.8 and 4 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound is convenient, cheap, without any side effect, and can provide additional information about liver metastases in H and N cancer patients. In patients with a history of H and N carcinoma ultrasound should be used to screen for isolated hepatic nodules even in the presence of normal liver function and if LDH elevation should be the only biological sign of alert.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Prognostic factors in primary breast sarcomas: a series of patients with long-term follow-up.

PURPOSE: To describe the pathologic characteristics and prognostic factors of primary breast sarcomas (PBSs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed the clinical records and pathologic slides of 83 women with PBS treated in our institution between 1954 and 1991, with a median follow-up of 7.8 years. The majority of patients had undergone surgical treatment. RESULTS: The main histologic type was malignant fibrohistiocytoma (n = 57). For the whole population, the 10-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 62% and 50%, respectively. For Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer grade 1, 2, and 3 tumors, the 10-year OS and DFS rates were 82% and 61%, 62% and 51%, and 36% and 25%, respectively (P =.00007 and.004, respectively). For tumors measuring less than 5 cm, 5 to 10 cm, and more than 10 cm, the 10-year OS and DFS rates were 76% and 66%, 68% and 55%, and 28% and 15%, respectively (P =.002 and.009, respectively). In the multivariate analysis, the tumor size and histologic grade were correlated with the 10-year DFS rate (P =.04 and.01, respectively), but only the histologic grade was correlated with OS (P =.01). Angiosarcoma was the only histologic type significantly associated with a poorer outcome in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: PBSs have the same clinical history and prognostic factors as sarcomas arising at other sites. Therefore, it is legitimate to use a similar treatment strategy for PBS as for other sarcomas.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

[Epidermal growth factor receptors (EGFR): a new target for anticancer therapy].

Epidermal Growth Factor receptor (EGFR) are a key factor for the tumoral proliferation and its tumoral over expression appears to be a powerful prognosis factor. Currently, 2 types of treatments are targeting EGFR: a monoclonal antibodies anti-EGFR and a specific inhibitors of the EGFR tyrosine kinase. The administration of these compound alone or in combination with chemotherapy gives some promising results. These targets as anti-cancer therapy had emerged to be a new perspective for oncology.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗
PubMed2003

Results of randomised phase II studies comparing S16020 with methotrexate in patients with recurrent head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to carry out two randomised phase II trials of S16020, a new olivacine derivative, tested as a single agent in patients with recurrent head and neck cancer, using methotrexate as the control arm to validate the results. PATIENTS AND METHODS: S16020 at either 80 or 100 mg/m2 was administered as a 3-h infusion every 3 weeks. Methotrexate, 40 or 50 mg/m2, was given by bolus injection, weekly for a minimum of 6 weeks. In total, 36 patients were entered in the randomised studies (25 in an initial study, 11 in a confirmatory study) of whom 24 received S16020 and 12 received methotrexate. RESULTS: A scheduled interim analysis showed one patient having a non-confirmed objective response with S16020 and three patients having a confirmed objective response with methotrexate. In the methotrexate group, there were no patients with severe non-haematological toxicity. With S16020, there was a high incidence of severe non-haematological toxicities, including asthenia, oedema of the face, oedema and pain at the tumour sites and erythematous rash; consequently, both studies were stopped. CONCLUSIONS: Both studies were stopped due to the poor anticipated benefit/risk ratio for S16020, although time to progression and overall survival time were similar in both treatment arms.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Pharmacokinetics of low-dose carboplatin and applicability of a method of calculation for estimating individual drug clearance.

BACKGROUND: Carboplatin is the only cancer drug for which conventional doses are individually adjusted according to estimated clearance and target area under the curve (AUC). The aim of this prospective study was (i) to evaluate intra- and interpatient variability of ultrafilterable (UF) carboplatin AUC(0-)(infinity) and (ii) to test whether the prediction of carboplatin clearance according to the Chatelut formula established for conventional carboplatin doses was accurate for low carboplatin doses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-one head and neck cancer patients (29 men, two women, mean age 55.9 years) received concomitant radiotherapy (Rgamma 2 Gy/day) and chemotherapy (carboplatin 50 mg/m(2)/day i.v.) for 7 weeks: Rgamma was administered 5 days/week (days 1-5) and carboplatin 2 days/week (days 1 and 4). Pharmacokinetics was performed once per week. A limited sample strategy based on Bayesian analysis was first validated and blood was subsequently taken 1 and 4 h after the end of carboplatin administration. RESULTS: A total of 143 cycles was analyzed. Ultrafilterable carboplatin AUC(0-)(infinity) ranged from 0.360 to 4.200 mg.min/ml (mean 0.830, median 0.670). As a corollary, UF carboplatin clearance ranged from 19.1 to 244.7 ml/min. Ultrafilterable carboplatin concentrations were very stable over time: AUC(0-)(infinity) variability due to treatment duration contributed to <1% of the total variance, while interpatient variability contributed to 68.6%. Accordingly, intrasubject effect was not significant (P = 0.38) whereas intersubject effect was highly significant (P <0.001). These results suggest that optimal dosage for targeting a given AUC may vary within a 13-fold range between patients. The Chatelut formula, based on creatininemia, body weight, age and sex, over estimates carboplatin clearance by 40% on average (bias 95% CI 29.6% to 51.1%). No significant relationship was observed between either bone marrow toxicity or creatinine clearance decrease and carboplatin pharmacokinetics. CONCLUSIONS: The Chatelut carboplatin clearance model established for conventional carboplatin dosages (>100 mg/m(2)) is not applicable for targeting low AUC (<1 mg x min/ml).

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of the association of capecitabine-cisplatin in head and neck cancer patients.

The combination of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is considered to be the standard treatment in induction chemotherapy for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Capecitabine (Xeloda) is an oral fluoropyrimidine that is preferentially activated at the tumoral level, exploiting the higher thymidine phosphorylase activity in tumoral tissue. This phase I trial was conducted in patients with locally recurrent or metastatic head and neck carcinoma. The treatment plan included cisplatin on day 1 every 21 days, followed by capecitabine twice daily from day 2 to day 15, with a 1-week rest period. Pharmacokinetic investigations concerned plasma measurement of unchanged capecitabine, 5'-deoxy-5-fluorocytidine, 5'-doxifluridine and 5-FU using an optimized high performance liquid chromatography method, and cisplatin measurement in plasma using a limited sampling procedure. Twenty-one patients were included (mean age 61 years, range 46-76 years). Dose (mg/m(2)) increments for cisplatin and capecitabine (b.i.d.), respectively, were as follows: level 1, 80 and 1000 (three patients); level 2, 100 and 1000 (12 patients); and level 3, 100 and 1125 (five patients). Dose-limiting toxicities occurring during the first cycle (grade >/= 3) were observed on level 2 (one patient with diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, hand-foot syndrome, one toxic death due to renal failure and neutropenia, one patient with neutropenia) and on level 3 (one patient with diarrhea, one patient with hand-foot syndrome and one patient with neutrothrombocytopenia). Due to delayed side-effects, 14 patients (67%) had repeated cycles every 28 days instead of 21 days as initially planned. Objective response was obtained in seven patients (three complete responses and four partial responses). There was no evidence of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships with the drugs and metabolites investigated. Combination of capecitabine and cisplatin is feasible, with a very promising response rate. The recommended doses for further phase II studies are those of level 2 with cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) on day 1 and capecitabine 1000 mg/m(2) b.i.d. on days 1-14, every 28 days.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2001

Pemetrexed disodium in recurrent locally advanced or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

This phase II study determined response rate of patients with locally advanced or metastatic head and neck cancer treated with pemetrexed disodium, a new multitargeted antifolate that inhibits thymidylate synthase, dihydrofolate reductase and glycinamide ribonucleotide formyl transferase. 35 patients with local or metastatic relapse of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (31 male, 4 female; median age 53 years) were treated with pemetrexed 500 mg m(2)administered as a 10-minute infusion on day 1 of a 21-day cycle. Patients received 1 to 8 cycles of therapy. 9 patients (26.5%) had an objective response, with a median response duration of 5.6 months (range 2.9-20 months). 15 (44.1%) had stable disease, and 8 (23.5%) had progressive disease. 2 patients were not assessable for response. Median overall survival was 6.4 months (range 0.7-28.1 months; 95% CI: 3.9-7.7 months). 24 patients (68.6%) experienced grade 3/4 neutropenia, with febrile neutropenia in 4 (11.4%). Grade 3/4 anaemia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 11 (34.3%) and 6 (17.1%) patients, respectively. The most frequent non-haematological toxicity was grade 3/4 mucositis (17.1%; 6 patients). In conclusion, pemetrexed is active in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Although substantial haematological toxicities were experienced by patients, subsequent studies have shown that these toxicities can be proactively managed by folic acid and vitamin B(12)supplementation.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Concomitant twice-a-day radiotherapy and chemotherapy in unresectable head and neck cancer patients: A long-term quality of life analysis.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to make a comparative analysis between acute toxicity with late toxicity. This study is based upon a French quality of life (QoL) questionnaire in a cohort of advanced head and neck (H&N) cancer patients treated by concomitant twice-a-day continuous radiotherapy with no acceleration and chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil. METHODS: From September 1992 to November 1997, a prospective data bank of 91 patients was constituted. In November 1999, 31 patients were still alive and followed for more than 3 years. All patients had stage IV strictly unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of oropharynx or hypopharynx. A French specific H&N cancer QoL questionnaire was used at the end of radiotherapy and at the last date of follow-up of each patient (during 1999). p values reflect comparison of percentages obtained at the end of treatment with percentages at long-term follow-up. Statistical analysis was performed using chi(2) test (p <.05 considered as significant). Percentages obtained by the QoL questionnaire correspond to moderate-severe problems only. RESULTS: Twenty-nine of 31 (94%) patients participated in the QoL study. Acute treatment toxicities were severe with declines in virtually all QoL and functional domains. Globally, with an average long-term follow-up of 4.5 years (range 3-7 years after treatment), there is a statistical improvement in the following symptoms: dry mouth and sticky saliva (97% versus 55%, p <.05); tasting problems (35% versus 21%, not significant); swallowing problems (77% versus 36%, p <.05); and H&N pain (86% versus 9%, p <.05). Financial problems were not improved (21% versus 14%, not significant), and psychological problems (59% versus 5%) were statistically significant. Fourteen of 29 (48%) patients were drinking and 8 of 29 (28%) were smoking at long-term follow-up; at the diagnosis they were 86% and 90%, respectively. At long-term follow-up 22 of 29 presented good or very good QoL, and 25 of 29 said they had improved their initial QoL. CONCLUSION: The interest of twice-a-day radiotherapy with concomitant chemotherapy is to increase total radiotherapy equivalent dose without increasing late toxicity and also to improve locoregional control, survival, and long-term QoL/effectiveness ratio. Best supportive care is recommended to obtain both good QoL and cancer control in a long-term follow-up.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

The relationship of epidermal growth factor receptor levels to the prognosis of unresectable pharyngeal cancer patients treated by chemo-radiotherapy.

The aim of this study was to analyse prognostic factors for time to treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS) in patients with unresectable cancer of the pharynx. A twice daily (b.i.d.) radiotherapy with concomitant cisplatin-5-fluorouracil chemotherapy was administered to 77 consecutive patients (68 males, 9 females; median age: 56 years). The studied factors were: age, gender, tumour differentiation, tumour volume, initial hemoglobin level, karnofsky index (KI), primary tumour location, T, N, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) level in the tumour (fmol/mg protein). KI and EGFR level were significant predictors in a multivariate analysis for TTF (P=0.004 and P=0.0001) and OS (P=0.004 and P=0.0001). In order to select subgroups with different outcomes, a stratification of patients was performed based on the EGFR value: patients with tumour EGFR levels <35 fmol/mg protein, between 35 and 275 fmol/mg protein and >275 fmol/mg protein had 95%, 51% and 16% 3 year OS rates, respectively (log rank test; P=0.0001). Interestingly, for patients exhibiting a complete response (CR) after concomitant b.i.d. chemo-radiotherapy, patients with EGFR levels <35 fmol/mg protein were all alive at 3 years; in contrast, there was only 70 and 13% 3 year survival rates for patients with EGFR tumour levels between 35 and 275 fmol/mg protein and above 275 fmol/mg protein, respectively. EGFR determination appears to be a powerful prognostic parameter in unresectable pharyngeal cancer patients treated by concomitant chemo-radiotherapy.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

[Concomitant bifractionated radiotherapy and chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil in locally progressive, non-resectable epidermoid carcinomas of the pharynx: ten years experience at the Antoine Lacassagne center].

PURPOSE: Patients suffering from locally advanced unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx and hypopharynx treated with radiotherapy alone have a poor prognosis. More than 70% of patients die within 5 years mainly due to local recurrences. The aim of this study was to evaluate retrospectively the Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center's experience in a treatment by concomitant bid radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Evaluation was based on analysis of the toxicity, the response rates, the survival, and the clinical prognostic factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1992 to 2000, 92 consecutive patients were treated in our single institution. All of them had stage IV, unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the pharynx and they received continuous bid radiotherapy (two daily fractions of 1.2 Gy, 5 days a week, with a 6-h minimal interval between fractions). Total radiotherapy dose was 80.4 Gy on the oropharynx and 75.6 Gy on the hypopharynx. Two or three chemotherapy courses of cisplatin (CP)-5-fluorouracil (5FU) were given during radiotherapy at 21-day intervals (third not delivered after the end of the radiotherapy). CP dose was 100 mg/m2 (day 1) and 5-FU was given as 5-day continuous infusion (750 mg/m2/day at 1st course; 430 mg/m2/day at 2nd and 3rd courses). Special attention was paid to supportive care, particularly in terms of enteral nutrition and mucositis prevention by low-level laser energy. RESULTS: Acute toxicity was marked and included WHO grade III/IV mucositis (89%, 16% of them being grade IV), WHO grade III dermatitis (72%) and grade III/IV neutropenia (61%). This toxicity was significant but manageable with optimised supportive care, and never led to interruption of treatment for more than 1 week, although there were two toxic deaths. Complete global response rate at 6 months was 74%. Overall global survival at 1 and 2 years was 72% and 50% respectively, with a median follow-up of 17 months. Prognostic factors for overall survival were the Karnofsky index (71% survival at 3 years for patients with a Karnofsky index of 90-100% versus 30% for patients with a Karnofsky index of 80% versus 0% for patients with a Karnofsky index of 60-70%, p = 0.0001) and tumor location (55% at 3 years for oropharynx versus 37% for panpharynx versus 28% for hypopharynx, p = 0.009). CONCLUSION: These results confirm the efficacy of concomitant bid radiotherapy and chemotherapy in advanced unresectable tumor of the pharynx. The improvement in results will essentially depend on our capacity to restore in a good nutritional status the patients before beginning this heavy treatment.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Result of two randomized trials comparing nolatrexed (Thymitaq) versus methotrexate in patients with recurrent head and neck cancer.

We report on two randomized trials performed in the USA and Europe, which compared methotrexate and nolatrexed as treatment for patients with recurrent head and neck cancer. Eligibility criteria included: histologically confirmed squamous-cell carcinoma, measurable disease, adequate hematological, renal and hepatic functions, failure of a first-line chemotherapy, and informed consent. Methotrexate 40 mg/m2 was weekly given by short infusion, and nolatrexed 725 mg/m2 per day was administered as a five-day continuous infusion, every three weeks. A total of 139 patients (63 in the USA. 76 in Europe) were randomized based on a ratio of 2/1: 93 and 46 received nolatrexed and methotrexate, respectively. Patient characteristics included 115 males and 24 females; median age 60 years. In the nolatrexed arm, the following grade 3-4 toxicities occurred: neutropenia (29.9%) with 3.1% of febrile neutropenia, mucositis (33.3%), and vomiting (10.3%). In the MTX arm, the grade 3-4 toxicities were neutropenia (7.1%) and mucositis (6.9%). There was no difference in activity between the nolatrexed and the methotrexate treatment: 3.3% and 10.8% of objective responses, 1.9 versus 1.5 months of disease-free progression and 3.5 versus 3.7 months of overall survival, respectively. Nolatrexed has demonstrated a similar activity to methotrexate.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Combination of cisplatin-doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide in adenocarcinoma of unknown primary site: a phase II trial.

The purpose of this report is to evaluate toxicity, response, and survival of the cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-cisplatin (CAP) chemotherapy regimen in patients with adenocarcinoma of unknown primary site (ACUP). Twenty-two patients with ACUP were eligible for this study between June 1992 and April 1999. There were 13 men (59%) and 9 women (41%) with a median age of 53.5 years (range: 29--78 years). Lung (seven), liver (six), vertebral bone site (six), and abdominal nodes (six) were the most common metastatic sites. Treatment consisted of doxorubicin 50 mg/m(2), cyclophosphamide 1,000 mg/m(2), and cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) (CAP), administered every 3 weeks; a total of six courses were planned. Twenty-two patients were assessable for toxicity and 20 patients were assessable for response. Grade III to IV neutropenia was observed in 14 patients (64%); febrile neutropenia occurred in 6 patients (27%) and in 10 cycles (12.5%). Grade III to IV anemia and thrombocytopenia were found in 12 (54.5%) and 9 patients (41%), respectively. Grade III to IV nausea and vomiting was observed in 9 patients (41%). Ten patients, 50% of the assessable population, obtained an objective response, including 3 complete (15%) and 7 partial (35%) responses. The median response duration was 3.9 months (range: 0.5--13.3 months). One patient (5%) had stable disease and 5 patients (25%) had progressive disease. The median overall survival and the median time to progression were 10.7 months (range: 0.4--56.9 months) and 8.8 months (range: 6.6--16.5 months), respectively. The CAP regimen in patients with ACUP had significant activity. This chemotherapy regimen induced a high level of grade III to IV toxicities and could not be considered as a treatment of reference. However, the emergence of long-term survivors among responder patients highlighted the need to search for an active treatment for patients with ACUP.

Adenocarcinoma↗