Biomedical subjects

X-Q Shi

Publications and source records attributed to X-Q Shi.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2004

Perceptibility curve test for conventional and colour-coded radiographs.

OBJECTIVE: A colour scale has been developed as a complement to the grey scale in radiographs. The aim of the present study was to compare colour-coded with conventional black-and-white radiographs in terms of the perceptibility curve test. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve digital radiographs were exposed on a test object from low to high exposures and recorded using the DIXI system (Planmeca Oy, Helsinki, Finland). An aluminium test object was used containing ten object details in the form of holes with depths ranging from 0.03 mm to 0.30 mm in steps of 0.03+/-0.01 mm. The new colour scale was used to transform the conventional black-and-white radiographs into colour radiographs by specially designed software. Ten observers were asked to analyse four sets of radiographs, i.e. colour-coded and black-and-white radiographs, and reversed colour-coded and reversed black-and-white radiographs. The object detail having the lowest perceptible contrast in each radiograph was registered for each observer. Perceptibility curves were plotted based on the mean value of observer data. RESULTS: Results from the perceptibility curve test showed that the information in colour-coded radiographs was at least as good as that in black-and-white radiographs. In fact, in the lower exposure range, colour-coded radiographs exhibited better perception than conventional black-and-white radiographs. CONCLUSION: Radiographs that are colour-coded with the applied colour scale may be used as an alternative to conventional black-and-white radiographs.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗

PubMed2004

Comparison of the psychophysical properties of various intraoral film and digital systems by means of the perceptibility curve test.

OBJECTIVES: To compare psychophysical properties of two intraoral films and three digital systems using the perceptibility curve (PC) test. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A test object was used to determine the exposures and exposure differences between the total thickness of the test object and details consisting of holes of increasing depth. The PCs for the two intraoral films, UltraSpeed and EktaSpeed Plus, were constructed employing exposure and exposure differences from dose response functions. Integrals of the PCs were calculated to obtain the psychophysical properties of the two films. Psychophysical properties of the two films were compared with those of the three digital systems published previously (CDR, Dixel and Digora). RESULTS: The PC for the EktaSpeed Plus showed a slightly higher peak than that for the UltraSpeed. Available exposure ranges were comparable. The PC for the EktaSpeed Plus was shifted to the left of the exposure axis indicating its higher sensitivity as compared with UltraSpeed. All three digital systems had narrower but higher peaks compared with the films. The integrals for the digital systems were considerably larger than those for the two film types. CONCLUSIONS: All the three digital systems have superior psychophysical properties compared with the two tested films.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗

PubMed2003

Perceptibility curves for the Digora system.

OBJECTIVES: To construct perceptibility curves (PCs) for given calibration settings in order to define psychophysical properties of the Digora storage phosphor system and to evaluate the effects of automatic exposure correction (AEC) on the PCs. METHODS: The Digora system was calibrated at two exposures, 80 microC kg(-1) (high calibration) and 40 microC kg(-1) (low calibration). Since the grey levels displayed in the radiographs are adjusted by AEC, dose-response functions at high calibration were obtained using AEC on and off modes. The dose-response function at low calibration was obtained with AEC off. The PC at each experimental setting was calculated using known physical parameters of the system and the performance of the average observer used in a previous study. In addition, PCs were also constructed using transmitted radiation flux behind the test object calculated from the attenuation coefficient in order to study observer and system performance. PCs obtained under these conditions were compared. RESULTS: The PC using calculated transmitted radiation flux behind the test object showed a wide plateau at the peak owing to AEC, while the PC obtained by a modified approach showed a higher but narrower peak. There were no differences between the two PCs using AEC on and off modes when the PCs were constructed using a modified approach. There were no differences between the two PCs obtained at high and low calibration settings or between the three PCs obtained with AEC on except for the position along the exposure axis. CONCLUSIONS: Psychophysical properties of the Digora system may be determined if we employ registered exposures from a dose-response function with AEC off under a given calibration setting. Under these circumstances the shape and height of the PCs will be unchanged irrespective of the AEC mode.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2003

Perceptibility curve test for digital radiographs before and after correction for attenuation and correction for attenuation and visual response.

OBJECTIVE: Two digital image processing methods, correction for X-ray attenuation and correction for attenuation and visual response, have been developed. The aim of the present study was to compare digital radiographs before and after correction for attenuation and correction for attenuation and visual response by means of a perceptibility curve test. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Radiographs were exposed of an aluminium test object containing holes ranging from 0.03 mm to 0.30 mm with increments of 0.03 mm. Fourteen radiographs were exposed with the Dixi system (Planmeca Oy, Helsinki, Finland) and twelve radiographs were exposed with the F1 iOX system (Fimet Oy, Monninkylä, Finland) from low to high exposures covering the full exposure ranges of the systems. Radiographs obtained from the Dixi and F1 iOX systems were 12 bit and 8 bit images, respectively. Original radiographs were then processed for correction for attenuation and correction for attenuation and visual response. Thus, two series of radiographs were created. Ten viewers evaluated all the radiographs in the same random order under the same viewing conditions. The object detail having the lowest perceptible contrast was recorded for each observer. Perceptibility curves were plotted according to the mean of observer data. RESULTS: The perceptibility curves for processed radiographs obtained with the F1 iOX system are higher than those for originals in the exposure range up to the peak, where the curves are basically the same. For radiographs exposed with the Dixi system, perceptibility curves for processed radiographs are higher than those for originals for all exposures. Perceptibility curves show that for 8 bit radiographs obtained from the F1 iOX system, the contrast threshold was increased in processed radiographs up to the peak, while for 12 bit radiographs obtained with the Dixi system, the contrast threshold was increased in processed radiographs for all exposures. When comparisons were made between radiographs corrected for attenuation and corrected for attenuation and visual response, basically no differences were found. CONCLUSION: Radiographs processed for correction for attenuation and correction for attenuation and visual response may improve perception, especially for 12 bit originals.

Humans↗