Biomedical subjects

Xander A A M Verbeek

Publications and source records attributed to Xander A A M Verbeek.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Calculation of effective VV interval facilitates optimization of AV delay and VV interval in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

BACKGROUND: In hearts with left bundle branch block (LBBB), both atrioventricular (AV) delay and interventricular (VV) interval determine left ventricular (LV) pump function in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). The optimal combination of AV delay and VV interval currently is determined by extensive hemodynamic testing. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the effective VV interval (VV(eff)) can be used to optimize AV delay and VV interval. METHODS: In eight canine hearts with chronic LBBB, LV pacing was performed at various AV delays as well as biventricular pacing at multiple AV delays and VV intervals. LV pump function was assessed from LVdP/dt(max) and stroke volume (conductance catheter). Interventricular asynchrony was calculated from the timing difference between upslope of LV and RV pressure curves. VV(eff) was defined as the time delay between activation of the RV apex and LV lateral wall, irrespective of the source of RV activation (RV pacing or intrinsic conduction). VV(eff) was determined from pacemaker settings and surface ECGs recorded during biventricular pacing at various AV delays (positive values denote LV preexcitation). RESULTS: For all animals, the relationship between VV(eff) and LVdP/dt(max) as well as LV stroke work was parabolic. Maximal improvement in LVdP/dt(max) was similar during LV pacing, simultaneous biventricular pacing, and sequential biventricular pacing and was obtained at similar values of VV(eff). VV(eff) was strongly correlated with interventricular asynchrony (R = 0.97 +/- 0.03). Optimum LVdP/dt(max) occurred at VV(eff) ranging from -24 to 12 ms (mean -6 +/- 13 ms). For each experiment, the optimal VV(eff) was virtually equal to the value halfway between its minimum (during LV pacing at short AV delay) and maximum (during LBBB) value (R = 0.91). CONCLUSION: Use of VV(eff) facilitates determination of the best combination of AV delay and VV interval during biventricular pacing. For each individual heart, VV(eff), resulting in optimum LV pump function, can be estimated using surface ECGs recorded during biventricular pacing.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

Tailoring cardiac resynchronization therapy using interventricular asynchrony. Validation of a simple model.

This study explores the use of interventricular asynchrony (interVA) for optimizing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), an idea emerging from a simple pathway model of conduction in the ventricles. Measurements were performed in six dogs with chronic left bundle branch block (LBBB) and in 29 patients of the Pacing Therapies for Congestive Heart Failure (PATH-CHF)-I study. In the dogs, intraventricular asynchrony (intraVA) was determined using left ventricular (LV) endocardial activation maps. In dogs and patients, the maximum rate of rise of LV pressure (LV dP/dt(max)) and the pulse pressure (PP) and interVA [time delay between upslope of LV and right ventricular (RV) pressure curves] were measured during LV, RV, and biventricular (BiV) pacing with various atrioventricular (AV) delays. Measurements in the canine hearts supported the pathway model in that optimal resynchronization occurred at approximately 50% reduction of intraVA and at an interVA value halfway that during LBBB and LV pacing. In patients with significant hemodynamic response during pacing (n = 22), intrinsic interVA and interVA at peak improvement (interVA(p)) varied widely between patients (from -83 to -15 ms and from -42 to +31 ms, respectively). However, the model predicted individual interVA(p) accurately (SD of +/-6 ms and +/-12 ms for LV dP/dt(max) and PP, respectively). At equal interVA, LV and BiV pacing produced equal hemodynamic response, but in 11 of 22 responders, BiV pacing reduced interVA insufficiently to reach the maximum hemodynamic response. LV pacing at short AV delay proved to result in better hemodynamics than predicted by the model, indicating that additional factors determine hemodynamics during LV preexcitation. Guided by a simple pathway model, interVA measurements accurately predict optimal hemodynamic performance in individual CRT patients.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

Left bundle branch block induces ventricular remodelling and functional septal hypoperfusion.

AIMS: Left ventricular (LV) dilatation, hypertrophy, and septal perfusion defects are frequently observed in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB). We investigated whether isolated LBBB causes these abnormalities. METHODS AND RESULTS: In eight dogs, LBBB was induced by radio frequency ablation. Two-dimensional echocardiography showed that 16 weeks of LBBB decreased LV ejection fraction (by 23+/-14%) and increased LV cavity volume (by 25+/-19%) and wall mass (by 17+/-16%). The LV septal-to-lateral wall mass ratio decreased by 6+/-9%, indicating asymmetric hypertrophy. After onset of LBBB, myocardial blood flow (MBF, fluorescent microspheres) and systolic circumferential shortening [CS(sys), magnetic resonance (MR) tagging] decreased in the septum to 83+/-16% and -11+/-20% of baseline, respectively, and increased in LV lateral wall to 118+/-12% and 180+/-90% of baseline, respectively. MBF and CS(sys) values did not change over 16 weeks of LBBB. Changes in external mechanical work paralleled those in CS(sys). Glycogen content was not significantly different between septum and LV lateral wall of LBBB hearts (16 weeks) and control samples, indicating absence of hibernation. CONCLUSIONS: The asynchronous ventricular activation during LBBB leads to redistribution of circumferential shortening and myocardial blood flow and, in the long run, LV remodelling. Septal hypoperfusion during LBBB appears to be primarily determined by reduced septal workload.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

Intra-ventricular resynchronization for optimal left ventricular function during pacing in experimental left bundle branch block.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to investigate to what extent intra-ventricular asynchrony (intraVA) and inter-ventricular asynchrony (interVA) determine left ventricular (LV) function in canine hearts with left bundle branch block (LBBB) during ventricular pacing. BACKGROUND: Pacing therapy improves LV pump function in patients with heart failure and abnormal ventricular conduction supposedly due to resynchronization. However, the relationship between LV pump function and measures of asynchrony is not well established. METHODS: In 15 experiments, LV (various sites) and biventricular (BiV) pacing was performed at atrioventricular (AV) delays of 20 to 140 ms. Measured were the maximum rate of increase (dP/dt(max)) of LV pressure and LV stroke work (SW) (conductance catheter), interVA (time delay between the upslope of LV and RV pressures), and intraVA (from endocardial electrical activation maps). RESULTS: Induction of LBBB increased interVA (-6.4 +/- 8.6 to -28.4 +/- 8.5 ms [RV earlier]) and intraVA (4.9 +/- 2.4 to 18.0 +/- 3.3 ms), whereas LV dP/dt(max) and SW decreased (-13 +/- 18% and -39 +/- 24%, respectively). During LBBB, LV and BiV pacing increased LV dP/dt(max) and SW (mean increases 14% to 21% and 11% to 15%, respectively) without changing diastolic function or preload. Optimal improvement in LV function was obtained consistently when intraVA returned to pre-LBBB values, while interVA remained elevated. Normalization of intraVA required AV delays shorter than the baseline PQ time during LV apex and BiV pacing, thus excluding endogenous LV activation, but AV delays virtually equal to the baseline PQ time (difference 4 +/- 9 ms, p = NS) during pacing at (mid)lateral LV sites to obtain fusion between pacing-induced and endogenous activation. CONCLUSIONS: In LBBB hearts, optimal restoration of LV systolic function by pacing requires intra-ventricular resynchronization. The optimal AV delay to achieve this depends on both the site of pacing and baseline PQ time.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

Relation between abnormal ventricular impulse conduction and heart failure.

Ventricular pacing and left bundle branch block (LBBB) are two of the most common causes of asynchronous electrical activation of the ventricles. The sequence of activation is an important determinant of cardiac pump function. The sequence of activation during LBBB and during pacing at the conventional pacing site, the RV apex, is similar. In this article the literature on the effect of RV pacing and LBBB on regional and global LV pump function, on long-term adaptations (remodeling) and on their possible contribution to the development of heart failure is discussed. Evidence is increasing that asynchronous electrical activation contributes significantly to the development of heart failure.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Quantification of interventricular asynchrony during LBBB and ventricular pacing.

The quantification of mechanical interventricular asynchrony (IVA) was investigated. In 12 dogs left bundle branch block (LBBB) was induced by radio frequency ablation. Left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV) pressures were recorded before and after induction of LBBB and during LBBB + LV apex pacing at different atrioventricular (AV) delays. Four IVA measures were validated using computer simulations on experimentally obtained pressure signals. The most robust measure for IVA was the time delay between the upslope of the LV and RV pressure signals (DeltaT(up)), estimated by cross correlation. The induction of experimental LBBB decreased DeltaT(up) from -6.9 +/- 7.0 ms (RV before LV) to -33.9 +/- 7.6 ms (P < 0.05) in combination with a significant decrease of LV maximal first derivative of pressure development over time (dP/dt(max)). During LV apex pacing, DeltaT(up) increased with decreasing AV delay up to +20.9 +/- 14.6 ms (P < 0.05). Interventricular resynchronization (DeltaT(up) = 0 ms) significantly improved LV dP/dt(max) by 15.1 +/- 5.9%. QRS duration increased significantly after induction of LBBB but did not change during LV apex pacing. In conclusion, DeltaT(up) is a reliable measure of mechanical IVA, which adds valuable information concerning the nature of asynchronous activation of the ventricles.

Animals↗