PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Xavier Le Coutour

Publications and source records attributed to Xavier Le Coutour.

4 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Fluoroquinolone use and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolation rates in hospitalized patients: a quasi experimental study.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the possible association between fluoroquinolone use and the rate of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) recovery from consecutive hospitalized patients. METHODS: We conducted a nonrandomized, prospective, controlled interventional "fluoroquinolone-free" study at 4 large teaching hospitals in northwest France, catering to a total of 5,882,600 persons. During the intervention period (January through December 2001), fluoroquinolone use was prohibited at 1 of the 4 hospitals (Caen Hospital), unless no effective alternative was available. Three university hospitals were used as controls because they had similar preintervention rates of MRSA. RESULTS: During the intervention period (2001), the annual rate of fluoroquinolone use decreased from 54 to 5 defined daily doses per 1000 patients per day at Caen Hospital and remained stable in the control hospitals. At the end of the intervention, the rate of MRSA isolation was significantly lower at Caen Hospital than at the control hospitals (353 [32.3%] of 1093 S. aureus isolates were MRSA, compared with 2495 [36.8%] of 6787 isolates; odds ratio, 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.69-0.99; P=.036), as determined on the basis of a marginal model that took into account within-hospital clustering. In a before-after time series analysis, compared with forecasted rates, there was a significant downward trend in observed monthly rates of MRSA isolation at Caen Hospital at the end of the intervention. CONCLUSION: This quasi experimental study confirms the association between fluoroquinolone use and MRSA isolation among hospitalized patients.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed2004

Alcoholic povidone-iodine to prevent central venous catheter colonization: A randomized unit-crossover study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare effectiveness in preventing central venous catheter colonization and infection of two protocols of cutaneous antisepsis using povidone-iodine solution in combination with ethanol or water. DESIGN: Randomized trial. SETTING: Medical intensive care department in a university hospital. PATIENTS: Consecutive patients requiring central venous catheter in two similar 11-bed units from January 1, 2001, to January 1, 2002. INTERVENTIONS: Alcoholic povidone-iodine solution protocol was randomly assigned to one of two units when the study began. Every 3 months the alcoholic protocol was switched from one unit to the other. Depending on the unit and the time the patient was admitted, catheters were inserted and cared for with 10% aqueous povidone-iodine solution or 5% povidone-iodine solution 70% ethanol-based combination. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Rates of catheter colonization, catheter-related bacteremia, and catheter-related infection were compared in the two protocols; 223 catheters were included in an intent-to-treat analysis. The incidence of catheter colonization was significantly lower in the alcoholic povidone-iodine solution protocol than in the aqueous povidone-iodine solution protocol (relative risk, 0.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.22-0.65, p <.001), and so was the incidence of catheter-related infection (relative risk, 0.34; 95% confidence interval, 0.13-0.91, p <.04). Catheter-related bacteremia were similar in both protocols. After adjusting for other risk factors, time to central venous catheter colonization was significantly longer in the alcoholic solution (adjusted hazards ratio, 0.3; 95% confidence interval, 0.2-0.6, p <.001). Based on a subgroup of 114 patients (57 in each protocol), analysis of 57 pairs of central venous catheters matched for age, duration, and site of insertion found similar results regarding the superiority of alcoholic povidone-iodine solution in preventing central venous catheter colonization and infection. CONCLUSIONS: The use of alcoholic povidone-iodine for skin disinfection reduced the incidence of catheter colonization and related infection compared with aqueous 10% povidone-iodine disinfection in an adult intensive care unit.

Anti-Infective Agents, Local↗
PubMed2002

Hand-rubbing with an aqueous alcoholic solution vs traditional surgical hand-scrubbing and 30-day surgical site infection rates: a randomized equivalence study.

CONTEXT: Surgical site infections prolong hospital stays, are among the leading nosocomial causes of morbidity, and a source of excess medical costs. Clinical studies comparing the risk of nosocomial infection after different hand antisepsis protocols are scarce. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of hand-cleansing protocols in preventing surgical site infections during routine surgical practice. DESIGN: Randomized equivalence trial. SETTING: Six surgical services from teaching and nonteaching hospitals in France. PATIENTS: A total of 4387 consecutive patients who underwent clean and clean-contaminated surgery between January 1, 2000, and May 1, 2001. INTERVENTIONS: Surgical services used 2 hand-cleansing methods alternately every other month: a hand-rubbing protocol with 75% aqueous alcoholic solution containing propanol-1, propanol-2, and mecetronium etilsulfate; and a hand-scrubbing protocol with antiseptic preparation containing 4% povidone iodine or 4% chlorhexidine gluconate. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Thirty-day surgical site infection rates were the primary end point; operating department teams' tolerance of and compliance with hand antisepsis were secondary end points. RESULTS: The 2 protocols were comparable in regard to surgical site infection risk factors. Surgical site infection rates were 55 of 2252 (2.44%) in the hand-rubbing protocol and 53 of 2135 (2.48%) in the hand-scrubbing protocol, for a difference of 0.04% (95% confidence interval, -0.88% to 0.96%). Based on subsets of personnel, compliance with the recommended duration of hand antisepsis was better in the hand-rubbing protocol of the study compared with the hand-scrubbing protocol (44% vs 28%, respectively; P =.008), as was tolerance, with less skin dryness and less skin irritation after aqueous solution use. CONCLUSIONS: Hand-rubbing with aqueous alcoholic solution, preceded by a 1-minute nonantiseptic hand wash before each surgeon's first procedure of the day and before any other procedure if the hands were soiled, was as effective as traditional hand-scrubbing with antiseptic soap in preventing surgical site infections. The hand-rubbing protocol was better tolerated by the surgical teams and improved compliance with hygiene guidelines. Hand-rubbing with liquid aqueous alcoholic solution can thus be safely used as an alternative to traditional surgical hand-scrubbing.

Anti-Infective Agents, Local↗