PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Xiao-Ru Li

Publications and source records attributed to Xiao-Ru Li.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Alternative moving window factor analysis for comparison analysis between complex chromatographic data.

In this investigation, a novel chemometric method is developed for the analysis of five possible relationships of components or spectral features between two correlative but different hyphenated chromatographic systems. It is very helpful for comparison study of components present in different complex systems in both chemistry and systems biology. The proposed method, named alternative moving window factor analysis (AMWFA), could be utilized to determine the number of common components between different samples and then to identify their corresponding spectra half-automatically. AMWFA can alternatively be employed to mind for the selective information hiding in anyone of the two compared data X and Y, and to self-verify the resolution results by changing the extracted target matrices in analysis. From the results of comparison of simulated hyphenated chromatographic data, volatile chemical components in drug pair rhizoma ligustici chuanxiong-radix paeoniae rubra (RLC-RPR) and its single herbal medicines, and analysis of Angelica oral solution and its plasma sample after oral intake to rabbit, powerful ability of the proposed method is shown.

Angelica↗

Analysis of volatile oil in Rhizoma ligustici chuanxiong-Radix paeoniae rubra by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and chemometric resolution.

AIM: To analyze the volatile chemical components of the herbal pair Rhizoma Ligustici chuanxiong-Radix paeoniae rubra (RLC-RPR) and compare them with those of each of the herbs alone. METHODS: Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), a chemometric resolution technique using the heuristic evolving latent projections (HELP) method, and the overall volume integration method were used. RESULTS: In total, 52, 38, and 61 volatile chemical components in RLC, RPR, and RLC-RPR essential oils were determined, respectively, accounting for 95.14%, 95.19%, and 89.68% of the total contents of essential oil of RLC, RPR, and RLC-RPR, respectively. The main volatile chemical components were butyldienephthalide (20.65%) and ligustilide (50.15%) for RLC; and n-hexadecanoic acid (20.18%), [Z,Z]9,12-octadecadienoic acid (30.11%), 2-hydroxy-benzaldehyde (17.08%) for RPR, and butyldienephthalide (14.80%), and ligustilide (38.91%) for RLC-RPR. The main volatile chemical components of RLC-RPR were almost the same as those of RLC, but the relative amounts were altered. CONCLUSION: The number of volatile chemical components in RLC-RPR was almost equal to the sum of the number in the 2 constituent herbs, but the relative amounts were altered. Furthermore, an acid-base reaction takes place during the process of decocting the herbs. The data gathered in this study may be helpful for understanding the synergistic nature of this herb pair in traditional Chinese medicine.

4-Butyrolactone↗