PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Xiaojing Zheng

Publications and source records attributed to Xiaojing Zheng.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Evaluation and comparison of gene clustering methods in microarray analysis.

MOTIVATION: Microarray technology has been widely applied in biological and clinical studies for simultaneous monitoring of gene expression in thousands of genes. Gene clustering analysis is found useful for discovering groups of correlated genes potentially co-regulated or associated to the disease or conditions under investigation. Many clustering methods including hierarchical clustering, K-means, PAM, SOM, mixture model-based clustering and tight clustering have been widely used in the literature. Yet no comprehensive comparative study has been performed to evaluate the effectiveness of these methods. RESULTS: In this paper, six gene clustering methods are evaluated by simulated data from a hierarchical log-normal model with various degrees of perturbation as well as four real datasets. A weighted Rand index is proposed for measuring similarity of two clustering results with possible scattered genes (i.e. a set of noise genes not being clustered). Performance of the methods in the real data is assessed by a predictive accuracy analysis through verified gene annotations. Our results show that tight clustering and model-based clustering consistently outperform other clustering methods both in simulated and real data while hierarchical clustering and SOM perform among the worst. Our analysis provides deep insight to the complicated gene clustering problem of expression profile and serves as a practical guideline for routine microarray cluster analysis.

Algorithms↗

Proteins can convert to beta-sheet in single crystals.

Raman microscopy was used to follow conformational changes in single protein crystals. Crystals of native insulin and of the 5S and 12S subunits of the enzyme transcarboxylase showed a mixture of Raman marker bands signifying alpha-helix, beta-sheet and nonordered secondary structure. However, by reducing the S-S bonds in the insulin crystal, or by lowering the pH for the 5S crystal, or by soaking substrates into the 12S crystal, the secondary structure in each crystal became predominantly beta-sheet. The beta-form crystals could be dissolved only with difficulty and yielded high-molecular weight protein aggregates, indicating that the beta-sheet formation involves intermolecular contacts. Although their morphology appeared unchanged, the crystals no longer diffracted X-rays. Using crystals that had not been exposed to laser light, the dye thioflavin T formed highly fluorescent complexes with the "beta-transformed" crystals but not with the native crystals.

Benzothiazoles↗

Transcarboxylase 12S crystal structure: hexamer assembly and substrate binding to a multienzyme core.

Transcarboxylase from Propionibacterium shermanii is a 1.2 MDa multienzyme complex that couples two carboxylation reactions, transferring CO(2)(-) from methylmalonyl-CoA to pyruvate, yielding propionyl-CoA and oxaloacetate. The 1.9 A resolution crystal structure of the central 12S hexameric core, which catalyzes the first carboxylation reaction, has been solved bound to its substrate methylmalonyl-CoA. Overall, the structure reveals two stacked trimers related by 2-fold symmetry, and a domain duplication in the monomer. In the active site, the labile carboxylate group of methylmalonyl-CoA is stabilized by interaction with the N-termini of two alpha-helices. The 12S domains are structurally similar to the crotonase/isomerase superfamily, although only domain 1 of each 12S monomer binds ligand. The 12S reaction is similar to that of human propionyl-CoA carboxylase, whose beta-subunit has 50% sequence identity with 12S. A homology model of the propionyl-CoA carboxylase beta-subunit, based on this 12S crystal structure, provides new insight into the propionyl-CoA carboxylase mechanism, its oligomeric structure and the molecular basis of mutations responsible for enzyme deficiency in propionic acidemia.

Acyl Coenzyme A↗

The transformation suppressor Pdcd4 is a novel eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4A binding protein that inhibits translation.

Pdcd4 is a novel transformation suppressor that inhibits tumor promoter-induced neoplastic transformation and the activation of AP-1-dependent transcription required for transformation. A yeast two-hybrid analysis revealed that Pdcd4 associates with the eukaryotic translation initiation factors eIF4AI and eIF4AII. Immunofluorescent confocal microscopy showed that Pdcd4 colocalizes with eIF4A in the cytoplasm. eIF4A is an ATP-dependent RNA helicase needed to unwind 5' mRNA secondary structure. Recombinant Pdcd4 specifically inhibited the helicase activity of eIF4A and eIF4F. In vivo translation assays showed that Pdcd4 inhibited cap-dependent but not internal ribosome entry site (IRES)-dependent translation. In contrast, Pdcd4(D418A), a mutant inactivated for binding to eIF4A, failed to inhibit cap-dependent or IRES-dependent translation or AP-1 transactivation. Recombinant Pdcd4 prevented eIF4A from binding to the C-terminal region of eIF4G (amino acids 1040 to 1560) but not to the middle region of eIF4G(amino acids 635 to 1039). In addition, both Pdcd4 and Pdcd4(D418A) bound to the middle region of eIF4G. The mechanism by which Pdcd4 inhibits translation thus appears to involve inhibition of eIF4A helicase, interference with eIF4A association-dissociation from eIF4G, and inhibition of eIF4A binding to the C-terminal domain of eIF4G. Pdcd4 binding to eIF4A is linked to its transformation-suppressing activity, as Pdcd4-eIF4A binding and consequent inhibition of translation are required for Pdcd4 transrepression of AP-1.

Animals↗

Substrate binding induces a cooperative conformational change in the 12S subunit of transcarboxylase: Raman crystallographic evidence.

The 12S subunit of transcarboxylase is a 338 000 Da hexamer that transfers carboxlylate from methylmalonyl-CoA (MM-CoA) to biotin; in turn, the biotin transfers the carboxylate to pyruvate on another subunit, the 5S. Here, Raman difference microscopy is used to study the binding of substrate and product, and their analogues, to single crystals of 12S. A single crystal is the medium of choice because it provides Raman data of unprecedented quality. Crystalline ligand-protein complexes were formed by cocrystallization or by the soaking in/soaking out method. Raman difference spectra were obtained by subtracting the spectrum of the apo crystal from that of a crystal with the substrate or product bound. Raman difference spectra from crystals with the substrate bound are dominated by bands from the protein's amide bonds and aromatic side chain residues. In contrast, Raman difference spectra involving the product, propionyl-CoA, are dominated by modes from the ligand. These results show that substrate binding triggers a conformational change in 12S, whereas product binding does not. The conformational change involves an increase in the amount of alpha-helix since markers for this secondary structure are prominent in the difference spectra of the substrate complex. The number of MM-CoA ligands bound per 12S hexamer can be gauged from the intensity of the MM-CoA Raman features and the fact that the protein concentration in the crystals is known from X-ray crystallographic data. Most crystal samples had six MM-CoAs per hexamer although a few, from different soaking experiments, contained only 1-2. However, both sets of crystals showed the same degree of protein conformational change, indicating that the change induced by the substrate is cooperative. This effect allowed us to record the Raman spectrum of bound MM-CoA without interference from protein modes; the Raman spectrum of a 12S crystal containing 2 MM-CoA ligands per hexamer was subtracted from the Raman spectrum of a 12S crystal containing six MM-CoA ligands per hexamer. The conformational change is reversible and can be controlled by soaking out or soaking in the ligand, using either concentrated ammonium sulfate solutions or the solution used in the crystallization trials. Malonyl-CoA also binds to 12S crystals and brings about conformational changes identical to those seen for MM-CoA; in addition, butyryl-CoA binds and behaves in a manner similar to propionyl-CoA. These data implicate the -COO- group on MM-CoA (that is transferred to biotin in the reaction on the intact enzyme) as the agent bringing about the cooperative conformational change in 12S.

Acyl Coenzyme A↗