From transcriptomic profiling to precision oncology: a bibliometric analysis of RNA sequencing in acute myeloid leukemia.
BACKGROUND: RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) has become an important tool for investigating the molecular heterogeneity of acute myeloid leukemia (AML); however, the global development and thematic evolution of this field remain inadequately characterized. OBJECTIVE: To map the global landscape of AML RNA-seq research and identify major knowledge domains, emerging themes, and temporal changes in research priorities. METHODS: Publications indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection and Scopus between January 1, 2007, and August 18, 2025, were retrieved. After database filtering, merging, and deduplication, 3,460 articles and reviews were included. CiteSpace, VOSviewer, the bibliometrix R package, and Microsoft Excel were used to analyze publication trends, collaboration networks, co-citation structures, keyword evolution, and citation bursts. RESULTS: Publication output increased steadily, accelerating after 2014. China contributed the largest number of publications (n = 547, 15.8%), whereas the United States had the highest total citation count. Major publication outlets spanned hematology, oncology, genomics, and molecular biology. Co-citation analysis identified prominent themes involving next-generation sequencing, gene mutations, KMT2A rearrangements, epigenetic dysregulation, leukemia-initiating cells, drug resistance, biomarkers, T-cell biology, and single-cell sequencing. Earlier literature emphasized sequencing technologies, gene expression profiling, and molecular alterations, whereas recent publications show increasing representation of cellular heterogeneity, single-cell transcriptomics, drug resistance, biomarker applications, immune-related research, and computational interpretation. CONCLUSION: While molecular characterization remains foundational, AML RNA-seq research has broadened to encompass increasingly prominent cellular, functional, computational, and translational dimensions. This study provides a structured overview of the field; nevertheless, bibliometric prominence should not be interpreted as direct evidence of clinical utility.