PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Xuan Kong

Publications and source records attributed to Xuan Kong.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

Repeatability of nerve conduction measurements using automation.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify nerve conduction study (NCS) reproducibility utilizing an automated NCS system (NC-stat, NeuroMetrix, Inc.). METHOD: Healthy volunteers without neuropathic symptoms participated in the study. Their median, ulnar, peroneal, and tibial nerves were tested twice (7 days apart) by the same technician with an NC-stat instrument. Pre-fabricated electrode arrays specific to each nerve were used. Both motor responses (compound motor action potential [CMAP] and F-waves - all nerves) and sensory responses (sensory nerve action potentials [SNAP] - median and ulnar nerves only) were recorded following supramaximal stimuli. Automated algorithms determined all NCS parameters: distal motor latency (DML), mean F-wave latency (FWL), distal sensory latency (DSL), CMAP amplitude, and SNAP amplitude. Latency was adjusted for skin temperature deviation from reference. Pearson correlation coefficient (CC), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), coefficient of variance (CoV), and relative intertrial variation (RIV) were calculated. RESULTS: Fifteen subjects participated in either upper or lower extremity studies with nine participating in both. With the exception of CMAP amplitude, all parameters had CoV less than 0.06. Upper extremity amplitude parameters had CCs greater than 0.85. CCs for latencies were greater than 0.80 except for the median nerve FWL (CC = 0.69). For lower extremity nerves, ICCs were highest for mean FWL (>0.90), followed by DML (>0.82) and then CMAP (peroneal 0.33, tibial 0.73). The 10th to 90th RIV percentiles were bounded by +/-7% for F-wave latencies; +/- 9% for all DSLs; and +/- 11% for DML (except peroneal at 15%). CONCLUSIONS: The reproducibility of NCS parameters obtained with an automated NCS instrument compared favorably with traditional electromyography laboratories. F-wave latencies had the highest repeatability, followed by DML, DSL, SNAP and CMAP amplitude. Given their high reproducibility, automated NCS instrument may encourage wider utilization of NCS in clinical and research applications.

Action Potentials↗

Factors influencing F-wave latency detection of lumbosacral root lesions using a detection theory based model.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the F-wave dilution hypothesis; which implies that absolute F-wave latencies obscure the much smaller delay associated with slow intra-lesion conduction, such is caused by nerve root compression in lumbosacral radiculopathy. A corollary objective is to determine how F-wave measurement and pathological factors influence diagnostic accuracy. METHODS: An analytical model is developed based on signal detection theory and a number of simplifying assumptions. Diagnostic accuracy, quantified by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, is determined for various model realizations derived from the clinical and experimental neurophysiology literature. A preliminary experimental validation of model predictions is also performed. RESULTS: Absolute F-wave latency does not influence the accuracy of focal lesion detection. F-wave latency variance and lesion pathology are the determinant factors. F-wave latencies and distal latencies are estimated to have qualitatively similar detection characteristics, although distal latencies have quantitatively better diagnostic efficacy for comparable focal pathology. Preliminary experimental results support the modeled dependence of diagnostic accuracy on latency variance and lesion severity. CONCLUSIONS: Absolute F-wave latency does not dilute slow conduction within focal lesions, such as in lumbosacral radiculopathy. The dominant measurement factor is F-wave latency variance. SIGNIFICANCE: To maximize the diagnostic utility of F-wave latencies, focus must be placed on reducing latency variance, such as through correction for demographic covariates. This model calls into question the F-wave dilution hypothesis.

Adolescent↗

NC-stat sensory nerve conduction studies in the median and ulnar nerves of symptomatic patients.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated validity and reliability of automated median and ulnar sensory nerve conduction study (NCS) measurements by the NC-stat. METHODS: Median and ulnar distal sensory latencies (DSL) and amplitudes (SNAP) were measured in sixty subjects with the NC-stat and by a neurologist (reference) using traditional instrumentation. The median-ulnar DSL differences (MUD) was calculated. Validity was quantified by the Pearson correlation. Reliability was evaluated by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Bland-Altman analysis, and inter-rater agreement of MUD abnormalities. RESULTS: As a result of differences in electrode placement, NC-stat and reference mean values had systematic differences. The correlation ranged from 0.70 (ulnar DSL) to 0.91 (median DSL). The ICC ranged from 0.69 (ulnar DSL) to 0.91 (median DSL). In Bland-Altman analysis of DSLs, NC-stat measurements had a bias of 0.56 ms (median) and 0.31 ms (ulnar) and precision of 0.31 and 0.30 ms. Inter-rater agreement for MUD abnormalities was 93.8% (raw) and 0.80 (Kappa). CONCLUSIONS: NC-stat validity and reliability metrics were similar to traditional NCS. Use of the NC-stat would require applicable reference ranges. SIGNIFICANCE: NC-stat median and ulnar NCS are valid and reliable. This device may be useful for increasing availability of NCS when clinically appropriate.

Action Potentials↗

Diabetic nerve conduction abnormalities in the primary care setting.

BACKGROUND: Nerve conduction studies (NCS) are the most objective measure of nerve function, and their use is recommended in the clinical and epidemiological evaluation of diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN). The purpose of this study was to utilize automated NCS technology to characterize nerve conduction of patients with diabetes in primary care settings. METHODS: The Diabetes cohort was drawn from 28 community clinics. The Control cohort consisted of subjects without diabetes and without evidence of neuropathy. Bilateral peroneal NCS were performed with an automated NCS instrument (NC-stat, NeuroMetrix, Inc., Waltham, MA). Neuropathic symptoms were quantified using an abbreviated form of the NTSS-6 questionnaire. Risk factors for abnormal NCS were determined using multivariate regression modeling. RESULTS: Data were collected for 172 control subjects and 1,358 subjects with diabetes. Statistically significant differences in peroneal NCS were found. Of the Diabetes cohort, 75.1% had at least one NCS abnormality, and 53.2% had bilateral abnormalities. Of the asymptomatic patients, 45% had bilateral NCS abnormalities. By contrast, 40% of those with clinically significant symptoms lacked bilateral NCS abnormalities. Independent predictors for bilateral NCS abnormalities were age, height, weight, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), and duration of diabetes. Up to 16% of the variance in NCS measurements was explained by HbA1c, duration of diabetes, and several demographic variables. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that automated NCS can provide nerve conduction confirmation of DPN in primary care settings and has clinical utility. These findings have important implications for the clinical and epidemiological evaluation of DPN.

Adult↗

Time-dependent changes in median nerve sensory amplitude after local anesthetic administration and tourniquet application.

Indirect visualization, as used in several newer mini-open and endoscopic carpal tunnel release (CTR) procedures, may increase the possibility of nerve injury in some cases. Intraoperative neural monitoring may be used to evaluate nerve location and integrity. In the study reported here, we assessed the feasibility of intraoperative neural monitoring by systematically exploring the effect of local anesthetic and tourniquet on median sensory amplitude. Results for 30 median nerves (7 symptomatic) showed that sensory amplitude decreased, on average, 54% with lidocaine injection, 15% with tourniquet application, and 47% with the combination. Sensory amplitudes of 9 of 10 nerves were still above 1.0 microV 15 minutes after anesthetic administration and tourniquet application. Study results demonstrate that intraoperative monitoring, using the amplitude of the median sensory nerve response, is viable under CTR conditions.

Action Potentials↗

Detection of lumbosacral nerve root compression with a novel composite nerve conduction measurement.

STUDY DESIGN: Multivariate logistic regression techniques were used to develop a composite nerve conduction measurement that detects lumbosacral (L5, S1, or both) nerve root compression. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of a composite nerve conduction measurement for detection of lumbosacral nerve root compression. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Nerve root involvement is characterized by clinical abnormalities and confirmed by radiologic and electrodiagnostic studies. Imaging studies visualize structural abnormalities; however, they are associated with high false-positive rates. Electrodiagnostic methods assess the physiologic integrity of the nerve roots. One form of electrodiagnostic testing, nerve conduction studies, is widely used for evaluation of musculoskeletal and neuromuscular complaints. Although similar clinical value is expected for the evaluation of nerve root compromise, prior applications of nerve conduction studies have yielded widely varying results. METHODS: Two groups of subjects were compared. The L5-S1 compression group was composed of 25 patients with magnetic resonance imaging-confirmed lumbosacral (L5, S1, or both) nerve root compression and symptoms in the appropriate segmental distribution. The majority of subjects (22) had at least one of the following findings on physical examination: positive straight-leg raise test, diminished ankle reflexes, sensory loss, or weakness. The control group consisted of 35 asymptomatic individuals with no history of radiculopathy or potentially confounding neuropathology. The posterior tibial and deep peroneal nerves were evaluated bilaterally in all study subjects using standard nerve conduction procedures, which consisted of the measurement of distal motor latencies and F-wave latencies that assess nerve root pathophysiology. A composite nerve conduction measurement was determined using multivariate logistic regression analysis. The efficacy of the composite measurement was assessed by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and by the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: Five F-wave latency parameters (peroneal mean F-wave latency, odds ratio = 0.42; peroneal seventh F-wave latency decile, odds ratio = 2.71; tibial mean F-wave latency, odds ratio = 8.90; tibial first F-wave latency decile, odds ratio = 0.47; tibial maximum F-wave latency, odds ratio = 0.44) were found to be predictive of nerve root compression. A composite nerve conduction measurement, NC composite, constructed from these five parameters (NC composite = exp(phi)/(1 + exp(phi)), phi = -31.2 + 1.0 * Per7 Decile - 0.88 * PerMean + 2.2 * TibMean - 0.88 * Tib1 Decile - 0.83 * TibMax) yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.91. At a threshold of 0.20, NC composite had a diagnostic specificity of 84.3% and a sensitivity of 83.3%. CONCLUSION: This preliminary study suggests that a novel composite nerve conduction measurement, based on F-wave latency parameters, may be highly effective at detecting magnetic resonance imaging-confirmed lumbosacral nerve root compression. Because these measurements provide objective evidence of functional nerve root compromise and are noninvasive, they may be of diagnostic value to clinicians evaluating patients presenting with low back and leg pain.

Adult↗

Utility of nerve conduction studies for carpal tunnel syndrome by family medicine, primary care, and internal medicine physicians.

INTRODUCTION: Nerve conduction studies (NCS) are increasingly being performed at the point-of-service by family medicine, primary care, and internal medicine (FM/PCP/IM) physicians. Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a common neuropathy often diagnosed with the aid of NCS. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of a point-of-service NCS data registry was conducted; 1190 patients who underwent NCS by 613 FM/PCP/IM physician practices, for evaluation of CTS were analyzed. Utility measures included demographic and electrophysiological characteristics of study population, adherence to evidence-based testing guidelines, and relevance of diagnostic outcomes. RESULTS: Tested patients tended to be over 40, female, and overweight or obese. The median nerve distal motor latency was 4.4 +/- 1.2 ms; 92.6% of studies met the testing guideline; 30.5% of tested limbs yielded normal results; 53.1% CTS; 5.4% ulnar neuropathy; and 11.0% nonspecific upper extremity neuropathy. DISCUSSION: This study demonstrated that point-of-service NCS by FM/PCP/IM physicians for CTS was applied to appropriate patient subpopulations, was performed in accordance with evidence-based testing parameters, and generated relevant diagnostic outcomes.

Adult↗