PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Y F Hulgus

Publications and source records attributed to Y F Hulgus.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

On values in recent American psychiatric classification.

The DSM-IV, like its predecessors, will be a major influence on American psychiatry. As a consequence, continuing analysis of its assumptions is essential. Review of the manuals as well as conceptually-oriented literature on DSM-III, DSM-III-R, and DSM-IV reveals that the authors of these classifications have paid little attention to the explicit and implicit value commitments made by the classifications. The response to DSM criticisms and controversy has often been to incorporate more scientific diversity into the classification, instead of careful inquiry and assessment of the principal values that drive the nosologic process. Implications for psychiatric science and future DSM classifications are discussed.

Forecasting↗

Clinical problem solving and the biopsychosocial model.

Engel's biopsychosocial model, while unifying the sciences relevant to medicine under general systems theory, is of limited utility in organizing bedside clinical problem solving. The authors consider this issue in light of the structure and goals of the clinical encounter. The biopsychosocial model is a model for organizing the sciences relevant to medicine; however, medical/psychiatric practice poses problems both within and outside the scientific realm. Since the biopsychosocial model cannot account for clinical problems to which the methods of science do not apply, the authors seek to facilitate biopsychosocial problem solving by proposing a clinical decision-making model that complements the biopsychosocial model. Their model directs the clinician's attention to three core aspects of the clinical encounter: problems of knowledge, ethics, and pragmatics. The authors reconsider Engel's case of Mr. Glover to demonstrate the anticipatory emphasis of the model. Other clinical examples are used to demonstrate the difficulties arising from mistaking one kind of aspect of medicine for another. When these three aspects of medicine are respected equally, a biopsychosocial practice is unavoidable.

Decision Making↗

Clinical controversy and the domains of scientific evidence.

The diversity of mental health care "schools" or therapeutic perspectives poses problems in selecting and using any single therapeutic perspective. This article describes the genesis of clinical controversy--that is, how two or more therapeutic perspectives of the same clinical situation can be so different yet not necessarily differ in outcome. Ideas drawn from contemporary philosophy of science show how different "schools" derive separate, incompatible sets of scientific evidence from the same clinical situation. The school or theory determines (in part) not just what evidence is used, but what evidence is actually perceived. The authors conclude by recommending a pluralistic approach to mental health care; they map out some consequences of this pluralism and suggest some strategies for minimizing the disadvantages of "mixing and matching" therapeutic perspectives.

Family Therapy↗

Hypothesizing and evidence-gathering: the nexus of understanding.

Prior discussion of hypothesizing as a session "guideline" has not fully clarified the derivation of hypotheses. Reviewing relevant philosophy of science literature, the authors develop the notions of evidence and evidence-gathering in systemic family therapy. The authors claim evidence-gathering and hypothesizing are interdependent, reciprocal elements of scientific understanding. The structure of evidence is described along with practical and qualitative rules for collecting and using evidence. This model is applied to a case example illustrating the logic of clinical process. Implications are discussed for family therapy training and supervision.

Data Collection↗

Coping in families with a retarded child.

The impact of a retarded child on a family has previously been described by individual family members' reports. This study of 40 families, 10 in each of four critical periods during the life of the retarded child, utilized videotaped interviews with whole families, with subsequent clinical observation and analysis based on the Beavers family assessment model. Healthy and problematic adaptations are delineated, with specific attention to systems concepts such as family structure and power, member individuation, feeling expression, and values. The report includes data analysis and a summary of pattern differences in family functioning.

Adaptation, Psychological↗

Knowing, valuing, acting: clues to revising the biopsychosocial model.

While remaining influential in education and research in psychiatry and medicine, the biopsychosocial (BPS) model has been criticized for ambiguity in conceptualizing everyday clinical problems. As a multilevel general systems approach, it leaves obscure which system level (cellular, person, family, community, and so on) is most clinically important at any point in time. As a model for psychiatry and medicine, it does not address the practical and moral dimensions of clinical work. This report reviews criticisms and concerns about the BPS model. These criticisms are used to begin a more practicable revision of the model.

Biological Psychiatry↗