PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Y K Batra

Publications and source records attributed to Y K Batra.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Prevention of pain on injection of propofol: a comparison of remifentanil with alfentanil in children.

AIM: Propofol has a high incidence of pain on injection, particularly when a vein on the back of hand is used. Administration of lidocaine, either before or mixed with propofol remains the most widely used method to attenuate this pain. The use of opioids such as alfentanil and fentanyl has been found to decrease pain induced by propofol injection. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of different doses of remifentanil and alfentanil in minimizing the pain caused by propofol. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, healthy premedicated children between the age group of 5-12 years admitted for adenotonsillectomy were randomly allocated to one of 6 treatment groups. Group I: remifentanil 0.25 microg kg(-1); Group II: remifentanil 0.50 microg kg(-1); Group III: alfentanil 15 microg kg(-1); Group IV: alfentanil 20 microg kg(-1) 60 s prior to propofol mixed with 1 mL of 0.9% normal saline; Group V: lidocaine 1 mL of 1% (10 mg) added to 100 mg of propofol and Group VI: normal saline. During the injection of propofol (3 mg kg(-1)) pain perception was assessed with a four-point behavioural scale: none, mild, moderate, or severe. RESULTS: There were 52 subjects in Group I, 51 in Group II, 49 in Group III, 52 in Group IV, 52 in Group V and 52 in Group VI; 63.46% of patients in Group I, 39.21% in Group II, 38.77% in Group III, 36.53% in Group IV, 38.46% in Group V and 84.61% in Group VI experienced pain. Statistically, Groups II, III, IV and V were significantly better than placebo in the reduction of propofol pain (P<0.0001). Groups II, III and IV significantly reduced the pain in comparison with Group I (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Pretreatment with intravenous remifentanil 0.5 microg kg(-1), alfentanil 15 microg kg(-1) and 20 microg kg(-1) were equally effective in reducing pain associated with propofol injection in children between the age group of 5-12 years.

Alfentanil↗
PubMed2004

Effect of varying doses of fentanyl with low dose spinal bupivacaine for caesarean delivery in patients with pregnancy-induced hypertension.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate haemodynamic stability, perioperative analgesia and neonatal outcome following intrathecal 0.5% bupivacaine 7.5 mg with varying doses of fentanyl, in parturients with pregnancy-induced hypertension. Forty-five parturients with pregnancy-induced hypertension scheduled for caesarean section were randomly allocated to receive 7.5 mg bupivacaine with saline 1 mL (group B), fentanyl 10 microg (group Bf10) or fentanyl 20 microg (group Bf20) intrathecally. Heart rate, blood pressure, and sensory block were recorded at regular intervals. Pain, nausea, vomiting, pruritus or any other side effects were sought. Neonatal outcome was assessed using Apgar score and umbilical artery blood gas analysis. Adequate surgical anaesthesia was established in all three groups. There was a statistically significant fall in mean arterial pressure in all three groups within 4-6 min of subarachnoid block (P<0.05), but the decrease in MAP was <20% of baseline in all three groups. Pain and discomfort during surgery were experienced more frequently in group B than in groups Bf10 and Bf20 (P<0.05). Duration of postoperative analgesia was significantly longer in group Bf20 (5.55+/-1.18 h) than in group Bf10 (3.97+/-2.12 h) and group B (3.27+/-1.8 h) (P<0.05). Neonatal outcome was similar in the three groups. Intrathecal fentanyl with low dose bupivacaine provides good surgical anaesthesia and prolongs the duration of analgesia without haemodynamic or neonatal compromise in patients with pregnancy-induced hypertension undergoing caesarean delivery.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Assessment of tracheal intubating conditions in children using remifentanil and propofol without muscle relaxant.

BACKGROUND: Tracheal intubation in children can be achieved by deep inhalational anaesthesia or an intravenous anaesthetic and a muscle relaxant, suxamethonium being widely used despite several side-effects. Studies have shown that oral intubation can be facilitated safely and effectively in children after induction of anaesthesia with propofol and alfentanil without a muscle relaxant. Remifentanil is a new, ultra-short acting, selective mu-receptor agonist that is 20-30 times more potent than alfentanil. This clinical study was designed to assess whether combination of propofol and remifentanil could be used without a muscle relaxant to facilitate tracheal intubation in children. METHODS: Forty children (5-10 years) admitted for adenotonsillectomy were randomly allocated to one of two groups to receive remifentanil 2 microg.kg(-1) (Gp I) or remifentanil 3 microg.kg(-1) (Gp II) before the induction of anaesthesia with i.v. propofol 3 mg.kg(-1). No neuromuscular blocking agent was administered. Intubating conditions were assessed using a four-point scoring system based on ease of laryngoscopy, jaw relaxation, position of vocal cords, degree of coughing and limb movement. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) measured noninvasively before induction of anaesthesia to 5 min after intubation (seven time points). RESULTS: Tracheal intubation was successful in all patients without requiring neuromuscular blocking agent. Intubating conditions were clinically acceptable in 10 of 20 patients (50%) in Gp I compared with 18 of 20 patients (90%) in Gp II (P < 0.05). MAP and HR decreased in both groups after induction of anaesthesia (P < 0.01). Both HR and MAP were significantly lower in Gp II compared with Gp I after tracheal intubation (P < 0.01). No patient in the present study developed bradycardia or hypotension. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that remifentanil (3 microg.kg(-1)), administered before propofol (3 mg.kg(-1)) provides acceptable tracheal intubating conditions in children, and completely inhibited the increase in HR and MAP associated with intubation.

Adenoidectomy↗
PubMed2003

Dose response study of caudal neostigmine for postoperative analgesia in paediatric patients undergoing genitourinary surgery.

BACKGROUND: Neostigmine given through the neuraxial route has been found to have analgesic properties. In this clinical trial, we evaluated for the first time the efficacy of a varying dose of caudal neostigmine for postoperative analgesia in children undergoing genitourinary surgery. METHOD: In this double blind prospective study, we studied 120 children ASA physical status I in age group of 2-8 years scheduled for surgical repair of hypospadias under general anaesthesia. Children were randomly allocated to one of the six groups (n = 20 each) and received either no caudal block (group C) or neostigmine (groups I-V) in doses of 10, 20, 30, 40 and 50 microgram.kg-1 respectively at the end of the surgery. Postoperatively pain was assessed using an objective pain score for 24 h. Blood pressure, heart rate, SpO2, total amount of analgesic consumed and adverse effects, if any, were also recorded. RESULT: The duration of postoperative analgesia did not differ significantly between group C and I (P > 0.05). There was significant prolongation in the duration of analgesia in rest of the groups (group II-3.52 +/- 1.37 h; group III-6.50 +/- 1.93 h; group IV-10.45 +/- 3.41 h; group V-13.70 +/- 5.52 h) (P < 0.05). A dose dependent increase in the incidence of nausea and vomiting was also observed with highest incidence in group IV and V (group C-15%; group I-20%; group II and III-30%; group IV-45% and group V-60%) (P < 0.05). No significant alteration in vital signs and other adverse effects were noticed. CONCLUSION: Caudal neostigmine in the dose range of 20-50 microgram.kg-1 provides dose dependent analgesia. However, dose exceeding 30 microgram.kg-1 is associated with a higher incidence of nausea and vomiting.

Acetaminophen↗
PubMed2002

Submucous fibrosis secondary to chewing of quids: another cause of unanticipated difficult intubation.

PURPOSE: To report a case of unusual difficult intubation secondary to oral submucosal fibrosis (SMF) associated with malignancy of the hypopharynx. CLINICAL FEATURES: A 57-yr-old male, ASA-I physical status presented for percutaneous nephrolithotripsy. The patient was a known alcoholic and smoker with a habit of chewing quids for the past 36 years. Airway assessment revealed oral SMF and slight difficulty in opening the mouth fully. Mentohyoid and mentothyroid distances were normal. However, during intubation, unanticipated difficulty was encountered. On direct laryngoscopy, the tip of the epiglottis could barely be visualized. Intubation was possible after passing a gum elastic bougie blindly under the epiglottis and negotiating a 7.0 internal diameter tracheal tube over it. Postoperatively, indirect laryngoscopy (IDL) showed severe SMF involving the oral cavity, epiglottis and pyriform fossae and an ulcerative malignancy of the hypopharynx with fixation of the left hemilarynx. CONCLUSION: SMF is a premalignant condition of the oral cavity associated with fibrosis of involved structures that can be associated with malignancy of the aerodigestive tract. Distortion of the airway anatomy may render intubation difficult. IDL maybe useful in the preoperative evaluation of these patients.

Areca↗
PubMed2001

A comparative study of caudal bupivacaine and midazolam-bupivacaine mixture for post-operative analgesia in children undergoing genitourinary surgery.

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of caudal midazolam-bupivacaine combination in providing post-operative pain relief in children undergoing genitourinary surgery and to study the occurrence of adverse effects. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirty children, aged 2 to 8 years, scheduled for genitourinary surgery were allocated randomly to receive either 0.25% bupivacaine 0.5 ml/kg (group B; n = 15) or 0.25% bupivacaine 0.5 ml/kg with 50 microg/kg midazolam (group BM; n = 15) by the caudal route immediately after induction of general anesthesia. Heart rate, arterial blood pressure and oxygen saturation were monitored throughout the study period. Postoperative pain was assessed at regular intervals for 12 hours using an objective pain score. Analgesia was supplemented whenever the pain score was > or = 4. Duration of analgesia, as well as the requirement of additional analgesics, were noted. RESULTS: Lowest pain scores were observed with the addition of midazolam to caudal bupivacaine (p < 0.01). Duration of analgesia was longer in group BM (11 +/- 0.5 h) as compared to group B (7.4 +/- 2.1 hours) (p < 0.05). Fewer children (26.6%) required additional analgesia in the combination group whereas in group B, 60% of the children received analgesic supplements within 6 hours after surgery (p < 0.05). There were no significant changes in heart rate, blood pressure and oxygen saturation in both groups. We observed no untoward event in either of the groups. CONCLUSION: Caudal administration of bupivacaine-midazolam mixture prolongs post-operative analgesia compared to bupivacaine alone without causing any adverse effects.

Anesthesia, Caudal↗
PubMed1999

Comparison of ondansetron with ondansetron and dexamethasone in prevention of PONV in diagnostic laparoscopy.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of ondansetron-dexamethasone combination with ondansetron alone for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). METHODS: This double blind, randomized study was carried out in 51 female patients, aged 20-40 yr, ASA-1 physical status undergoing gynecological diagnostic laparoscopy. Group 1 (n = 26) received 4 mg ondansetron i.v. and group 2 (n = 25) received a combination of 4 mg ondansetron and 8 mg dexamethasone i.v. soon after induction of anesthesia. Postoperatively patients were assessed hourly for four hours and then at 24 hr for nausea, vomiting, pain and post anesthetic discharge score. Vomiting occurring up to two hours was considered early vomiting and from 2-24 hr as delayed vomiting. RESULTS: The postoperative nausea score was lower in patients receiving a combination of ondansetron and dexamethasone (3.76) than ondansetron alone (4.38) at 0 hr (P < 0.01), 2 hr (P < 0.05) and 24 hr (P < 0.01). In group 1, 38.5% of patients had a nausea score of > or = 5 (major nausea) compared with only 12% of patients in group 2 (P < 0.025). The overall incidence of vomiting was greater in group 1 (35%) than in group 2 (8%) (P < 0.05). The combination group showed better control of delayed vomiting compared with the ondansetron group (4% vs 35%) (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The combination of ondansetron and dexamethasone provides adequate control of PONV, with delayed PONV being better controlled than early PONV.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Comparison of caudal tramadol vs bupivacaine for post-operative analgesia in children undergoing hypospadias surgery.

In a prospective double-blind study, 40 children scheduled for hypospadias repair were allocated randomly to receive either caudal tramadol (1 mg/kg) or 0.25% plain bupivacaine (0.5 ml/kg). Postoperative pain score, side-effects and oxygen saturation (SaO2) were recorded during 24-hour observation period. The results point toward a significantly lower pain scores with caudal bupivacaine in the immediate postoperative period, whereas caudal tramadol caused a significantly lower pain score in the late postoperative period. Total consumption of rescue analgesics was significantly higher in bupivacaine group as compared to tramadol group during the study period (p < 0.001). The incidence of side-effects such as vomiting was more frequent with caudal tramadol, but there was no detectable difference in SaO2. We conclude that caudal tramadol can safely be used for postoperative analgesia with a longer duration as compared to caudal bupivacaine.

Analgesics, Opioid↗
PubMed1999

Addition of intrathecal midazolam to bupivacaine produces better post-operative analgesia without prolonging recovery.

OBJECTIVE: The administration of midazolam by centroneuraxis route has been shown to produce segmental antinociception. This midazolam analgesia was found to enhance the effects of local anesthetics given in combination epidurally without any adverse effects. The present study was designed to evaluate the post-operative analgesic effect of intrathecal midazolam-bupivacaine mixture in patients undergoing knee arthroscopy. METHODS: Thirty healthy patients scheduled for knee arthroscopy were divided into two groups to receive either midazolam-bupivacaine mixture (group M; n = 15) or bupivacaine alone (group B; n = 15) intrathecally. Level of sensory block, sedation score, assessment of pain using visual analogue score were recorded in both groups at regular time intervals. Time to block regression, recovery to ambulation and ability to void were recorded and noted before discharge. RESULTS: A significantly higher VAS score was seen in group B patients as compared to the score observed in group M patients before discharge (p<0.05). All patients received rescue analgesia in group B at a mean duration of 258 +/-46.8 minutes whereas only one patient in group M required supplemental analgesia within this period. Time to regression of sensory analgesia to L5-S1 level was longer in group M (267+/-67.38) as compared to group B (229.8+/-41.4) (p<0.05). Blood pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation and sedation score showed no differences between the groups. Neither motor block nor time to void were prolonged with the addition of midazolam to bupivacaine. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that addition of midazolam to bupivacaine intrathecally provided better post-operative analgesia without any adverse effects.

Adjuvants, Anesthesia↗
PubMed1998

Comparison of psychomotor functions and sedation following premedication with oral diazepam and clonidine in children.

In a prospective, double-blind, controlled, randomized study, the psychomotor functions and sedation were assessed after premedication with diazepam and clonidine in children. Forty children in the age-group of 5-8 years, undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia were studied. Twenty children (group 1) received oral clonidine 4 microg/kg, and 20 children (group 2) received oral diazepam 0.2 mg/kg, 120 minutes before induction of anesthesia. Sedation and psychomotor functions were assessed in both groups, before and after 60-90 minutes of administration of premedication. The results of the study showed that mean sedation score in group 1 was 8 +/- 1.07, and 9 +/- 0.64 in group 2. On intergroup comparison the sedation was found to be comparatively better in group 2 than group 1 (p < 0.05). The performance of psychomotor functions decreased after premedication in both the groups as compared to that before premedication (p < 0.05). The psychomotor functions were depressed more in diazepam group than in the clonidine group (p < 0.05). Thus, it is concluded that clonidine produces good sedation and causes less effect on psychomotor functions and therefore can be used for premedication in children.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1997

Comparative study of oral clonidine and diazepam as premedicants in children.

In a prospective, double-blind, controlled study the efficacy of clonidine was assessed in children, with respect to sedation, intubation response, and recovery. Fifty children, aged 4-12 years, undergoing general anesthesia were studied. Twenty-five children (group I) received oral diazepam) 0.2 mg/kg and another 25 children (group II) received oral clonidine 3 micrograms/kg, 90-120 minutes before induction of anesthesia. The level of sedation, hemodynamic changes to laryngoscopy and intubation, the recovery from anesthesia were noted and compared between the groups. Clonidine 3 micrograms/kg produced sedation comparable to diazepam 0.2 mg/kg (p > 0.1). There was significant (p > 0.01) attenuation of hemodynamic intubation response with clonidine. The recovery with clonidine was not delayed (p < 0.01). Clinically significant hypotension and bradycardia were not observed in any of the patients. We conclude that clonidine 3 micrograms/kg produces sedation comparable to diazepam 0.2 mg/kg and also attenuates the intubation response without increasing the incidence of complications.

Adrenergic alpha-Agonists↗