PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Y Lamarre

Publications and source records attributed to Y Lamarre.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Arm-trunk coordination in the absence of proprioception.

During trunk-assisted reaching to targets placed within arm's length, the influence of trunk motion on the hand trajectory is compensated for by changes in the arm configuration. The role of proprioception in this compensation was investigated by analyzing the movements of 2 deafferented and 12 healthy subjects. Subjects reached to remembered targets (placed approximately 80 degrees ipsilateral or approximately 45 degrees contralateral to the sagittal midline) with an active forward movement of the trunk produced by hip flexion. In 40% of randomly selected trials, trunk motion was mechanically blocked. No visual feedback was provided during the experiment. The hand trajectory and velocity profiles of healthy subjects remained invariant whether or not the trunk was blocked. The invariance was achieved by changes in arm interjoint coordination that, for reaches toward the ipsilateral target, started as early as 50 ms after the perturbation. Both deafferented subjects exhibited considerable, though incomplete, compensation for the effects of the perturbation. Compensation was more successful for reaches to the ipsilateral target. Both deafferented subjects showed invariance between conditions (unobstructed or blocked trunk motion) in their hand paths to the ipsilateral target, and one did to the contralateral target. For the other deafferented subject, hand paths in the two types of trials began to deviate after about 50% into the movement, because of excessive elbow extension. In movements to the ipsilateral target, when deafferented subjects compensated successfully, the changes in arm joint angles were initiated as early as 50 ms after the trunk perturbation, similar to healthy subjects. Although the deafferented subjects showed less than ideal compensatory control, they compensated to a remarkably large extent given their complete loss of proprioception. The presence of partial compensation in the absence of vision and proprioception points to the likelihood that not only proprioception but also vestibulospinal pathways help mediate this compensation.

Adaptation, Physiological↗

Unmyelinated tactile afferents signal touch and project to insular cortex.

There is dual tactile innervation of the human hairy skin: in addition to fast-conducting myelinated afferent fibers, there is a system of slow-conducting unmyelinated (C) afferents that respond to light touch. In a unique patient lacking large myelinated afferents, we found that activation of C tactile (CT) afferents produced a faint sensation of pleasant touch. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) analysis during CT stimulation showed activation of the insular region, but not of somatosensory areas S1 and S2. These findings identify CT as a system for limbic touch that may underlie emotional, hormonal and affiliative responses to caress-like, skin-to-skin contact between individuals.

Adult↗

Locus of the redundant-signals effect in bimodal divided attention: a neurophysiological analysis.

We reanalyzed the data from the study of Lamarre, Busby, and Spidalieri (1983). In that study, the activity of single neurons in area 4 of the motor cortex was recorded during a bimodal detection task in which a monkey (Macaca mulatta) had to respond as quickly as possible to a visual or an auditory signal or to both (redundant trials). Manual responses on redundant trials were speeded by the presence of both signals, as is typically found. The times between signal onsets and the first changes in neuronal activity were also speeded by redundant signals, but there was no difference between redundant-signals and single-signal trials in the time between the change in neuronal activity and movement onset. These results suggest that late motor processes are not speeded by redundant signals in bimodal detection tasks.

Animals↗

Deafferentation and pointing with visual double-step perturbations.

The capability of reprogramming movement responses following changes in the visual goal has been studied through the double-step paradigm. These studies have shown that: (a) continuous internal feedback-loops correct unconsciously the dynamic errors throughout the movement; (b) proprioceptive information and/or the efference copy have a privileged status among central processes, insuring on-line regulation of the initial motor commands; and (c) generation of the motor program starts after target presentation, and is continuously updated in the direction of the current internal representation of the target, at least until the onset of hand movement. This main corrective process of the initial program appears to be basically independent of visual reafference from the moving hand. However, the agreement with the possibility of a visuomotor loop, based on the comparison of the new updated representation of the target position and on the information from the moving hand, has not determined whether the correcting process is proprioceptive feedback dependent, or whether internal feedback-loops (efferent copies) are responsible for quick corrections of unfolding motor responses. To answer this question, the present experiment investigated the pointing behavior of a deafferented subject, using a double-step paradigm under various conditions of visual feedback and movement initiation. Overall, the present study (a) clearly showed the capacity of the motor system to modify and correct erroneous trajectories on the mere basis of internal feedback-loops and (b) emphasized the crucial role played by the target jump/arm triggering delay and the importance of the eye efferent copy for providing information about the spatial goal of the movement.

Afferent Pathways↗

Role of the feedforward command and reafferent information in the coordination of a passing prehension task.

The performances of a deafferented patient and five control subjects have been studied during a self-driven passing task in which one hand has to grasp an object transported by the other hand and in a unimanual reach-to-grasp task. The kinematics of the reach and grasp components and the scaling of the grip aperture recorded for the self-driven passing task were very similar in controls and the deafferented subject (GL). In contrast, for the unimanual task when vision was absent, GL's coordination between reaching and grasping was delayed in space and time compared with the control subjects. In addition, frequent reopening of the grip was observed in GL during the final closure phase of the unimanual prehension task. These results support the notion that afferent proprioceptive information resulting from the reaching movement - which seemed to be used to coordinate reaching and grasping commands in the unimanual task - is no longer necessary in the self-induced passing task. Finally, for the externally driven passing task, when the object was passively transported by the experimenter, the coordination was consistently modified in all subjects; grip aperture onset was delayed, thus asserting a specific contribution of the central command or feedforward mechanisms into the anticipation of the grasp onset observed in the self-driven passing task. The origin and nature of the information necessary for building up the feedforward mechanisms remains to be elucidated.

Adult↗

How efficient are central mechanisms for the learning and retention of coincident timing actions?

We compared the adaptive strategy and retention capacity of a deafferented subject and control subjects when intercepting, with a sliding-throw, an apparent movement coming at various speeds. Subjects were submitted to five practice sessions (30 trials per session) and to a retention test. The throwing kinematics was analysed, and spatial and temporal performance errors were measured. With practice, the deafferented subject showed modifications in movement initiation strategies and throwing patterns. With a slow apparent movement, the deafferented subject's initial behavior was characterized by short movement initiation and movement times. With practice, she showed an important increase in movement time in session 5, allowing longer visual control and leading to better temporal and spatial accuracy than that shown in session 1. In the retention session, the deafferented patient showed a late movement initiation strategy, similar to that of the control subjects. This increased movement initiation time was accompanied by an improved temporal accuracy compared to the deafferented subject's early results. However, spatial accuracy improvement was labile and could not be maintained over the retention interval. At the fast speed, all temporal components of the response, namely, movement initiation time (MIT), movement time (MT), and disk travel time (DTT), were similar for the deafferented and control subjects. Overall, the deafferented subject reduced her temporal error through practice, though without attaining the control subjects' accuracy. However, with a fast-moving stimulus, she showed a deteriorated spatial accuracy, even doubling her spatial errors at retention. In brief, the deafferented subject achieved proper temporal (perceptivo-cognitive) lasting control of her interceptive action, whereas spatial (sensorimotor) regulation raised mnemonic problems.

Afferent Pathways↗

Movement-related modulation across the receptive field of neurons in the primary somatosensory cortex of the monkey.

Cutaneous signals are modulated at the various relays just preceding and during voluntary movements. In these conditions, neuronal discharge in the primary somatosensory cortex (SI) related to movement per se is still evident while discharge to air puff stimulation on the skin is diminished. This selective modulation could be explained by rapid movement-related changes in receptive field (RF) configuration. We tested this hypothesis by giving air puff stimuli at different sites within and at the edges of the RF of SI cells during rest and elbow flexions in one awake monkey. For 40 cells, analysis of the global response yielded four different types of modulation: non-modulated cells, completely gated cells, partially and uniformly modulated cells, and non-uniformly modulated cells. Cell discharge for successive 5-ms intervals was also analyzed at the different sites and showed that response uniformity across time is more robust at the RF center than at peripheral sites in the RF. While this study did not show any clear RF displacement, intra-RF excitability seems to be affected by movement in various ways at the level of the cortex. These facts could have implications for information processing during movement.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

Local field potential oscillations in primate cerebellar cortex during voluntary movement.

Sustained oscillations of 13-18 Hz were observed in local field potentials (LFPs) in the cerebellar cortex of a behaving monkey. These oscillations, which appeared to be generated in the granular cell layer, were particularly prominent in the paramedian lobule. The oscillatory activity decreased during drowsiness or extreme arousal and occurred most often when the animal was immobile but alert. In a task requiring the animal to move the arm approximately 1 s after an auditory cue, the oscillations stopped some 150-200 ms after the cue, resumed 200-300 ms later, and stopped again 50-100 ms before movement onset. This modulation pattern was observed with consistency only when the animal responded reliably to the auditory cue. The results suggest that the cerebellum could be involved in some higher level of integration particularly during complex sensorimotor behavior.

Animals↗

Bilateral contributions to motor recovery in the monkey following lesions of the deep cerebellar nuclei.

A unilateral lesion of the deep cerebellar nuclei in monkeys produced a transient inability to perform a reaching task with the limb ipsilateral to the lesion. The deficit recovered within 2 weeks following a time course having a initial rapid and a subsequent slower phase. After a second lesion of the cerebellar nuclei on the opposite side, the animals developed a bilateral deficit. Recovery occurred bilaterally after this second stage but following the slower rate observed after the first lesion. From these experiments we conclude that the initial, more rapid phase of the recovery after a unilateral cerebellar lesion depends upon intact contralateral cerebellar circuitry and that the slower rate of recovery was mediated by other parts of the motor system.

Animals↗

Control of single-joint movements in deafferented patients: evidence for amplitude coding rather than position control.

Two deafferented patients and several control subjects participated in a series of experiments to investigate how accurate single-joint movements are programmed, spatially calibrated, and updated in the absence of proprioceptive information. The deafferented patients suffered from a permanent and severe loss of large sensory myelinated fibers below the neck. Subjects performed, with and without vision, sequences of forearm supinations and pronations with two temporal delays between each movement (0 s and 8 s). Overall, the lack of proprioception did not yield any significant decrease in movement accuracy when vision was available. Without vision, the absence of proprioceptive afferents yielded (1) significantly larger spatial errors, (2) amplitude errors similar to those of control subjects, and (3) a significant drift when an 8-s delay was introduced between two successive movements. Subjects also performed, without vision, a 20 degrees supination followed by a 20 degrees pronation that brought back the wrist to the starting position. On some trials, the supination was blocked unexpectedly by way of a magnetic brake. When the supination was blocked, subjects were already on the second target and no pronation was required when the brake was released. The deafferented patients, unaware of the procedure, always produced a 20 degrees pronation. These data confirm that deafferented patients were not coding a final position. It rather suggests that they coded an amplitude and translated the spatial distance between the two targets in a corresponding force pulse. Overall, the results highlight the powerful and key role of proprioceptive afferents for calibrating the spatial motor frame of reference.

Adult↗

Self-moved target eye tracking in control and deafferented subjects: roles of arm motor command and proprioception in arm-eye coordination.

1. When a visual target is moved by the subject's hand (self-moved target tracking), smooth pursuit (SP) characteristics differ from eye-alone tracking: SP latency is shorter and maximal eye velocity is higher in self-moved target tracking than in eye-alone tracking. The aim of this study was to determine which signals (motor command and/or proprioception) generated during arm motion are responsible for the decreased time interval between arm and eye motion onsets in self-moved target tracking. 2. Six control subjects tracked a visual target whose motion was generated by active or passive movements of the observer's arm in order to determine the role played by arm proprioception in the arm-eye coordination. In a second experiment, the participation of two subjects suffering complete loss of proprioception allowed us to assess the contribution of arm motor command signals. 3. In control subjects, passive movement of the arm led to eye latencies significantly longer (130 ms) than when the arm was actively self-moved (-5 ms:negative values meaning that the eyes actually started to move before the target) but slightly shorter than in eye-alone tracking (150 ms). These observations indicate that active movement of the arm is necessary to trigger short-latency SP of self-moved targets. 4. Despite the lack of proprioceptive information about arm motion, the two deafferented subjects produced early SP (-8 ms on average) when they actively moved their arms. In this respect they did not differ from control subjects. Active control of the arm is thus sufficient to trigger short-latency SP. However, in contrast with control subjects, in deafferented subjects SP gain declined with increasing target motion frequency more rapidly in self-moved target tracking than in eye-alone tracking. 5. The deafferented subjects also tracked a self-moved target while the relationship between arm and target motions was altered either by introducing a delay between arm motion and target motion or by reversing target motion relative to arm motion. As with control subjects, delayed target motion did not affect SP latency. Furthermore, the deafferented subjects adapted to the reversed arm-target relationship faster than control subjects. 6. The results suggest that arm motor command is necessary for the eye-to-arm motion onset synchronization, because eye tracking of the passively moved arm was performed by control subjects with a latency comparable with that of eye-alone tracking of an external target. On the other hand, as evidenced by the data from the deafferented subjects, afferent information does not appear to be necessary for reducing the time between arm motion and SP onsets. However, afferent information appears to contribute to the parametric adjustment between arm motor command and visual information about arm motion.

Adult↗

Gait of a deafferented subject without large myelinated sensory fibers below the neck.

We evaluated the gait pattern of a deafferented subject who suffered a permanent loss of large sensory myelinated fibers below the neck following an acute episode of purely sensory neuropathy 21 years ago. The subject has developed several strategies to achieve a secure gait, namely: (1) a reduction of the degrees of freedom by freezing the knee articulations during the stance phase, (2) a preservation of body balance by enlarging his base of support, and (3) visual monitoring of his step by stabilizing the head-trunk linkage together with a characteristic forward tilt. As a result, the gait of the deafferented subject lacks the fluidity of normal gait. Compared with normal subjects, the gait pattern of the deafferented subjects is characterized by a shorter cycle length, a longer cycle duration, a slower speed, and a lower cadence. Using a dual-task paradigm, the attentional demands for walking were particularly important (as indexed by longer probe reaction times) during the double-support phase, suggesting that the deafferented subject uses the double-support phase as a transitory stable phase to update cognitively the postural features necessary for generating his next step.

Denervation↗

Weight judgment. The discrimination capacity of a deafferented subject.

A weight discrimination study was undertaken to test (i) the capacity of controls and a deafferented subject (deprived of large sensory myelinated fibres from nose down), to discriminate weights with and without vision; (ii) the capacities of observers to discriminate weights while watching the deafferented and control subjects' lifting movements; (iii) the contribution of supplementary sources of sensory information (e.g. vestibular afferents) to the deafferented subject's discrimination capacity. With vision, G.L.'s liminal discrimination of weights was similar to that of the controls. In contrast, precluding vision impaired massively, but not completely, G.L.'s discrimination capacity, so emphasizing the importance of visual kinaesthetic cues in G.L. and incidently the importance of large myelinated sensory function in weight discrimination in controls. Kinematics recordings of G.L.'s lifting movements with vision revealed a significant correlation between weight and peak velocity of the lifting movement. This reflects a specific strategy used by G.L. to generate movements, allowing her to judge the weight of a lifted object visually. Peak velocity rather than amplitude of movement appears to be the main cue for G.L. since there was a lack of correlation between amplitude and weight lifted. For controls, none of the correlations (weight versus amplitude or weight versus velocity) was significant, whether vision was available or not. When watching G.L.'s lifting performance, external observers were able to use similar cues to establish their judgments, but they were far less accurate in doing so when watching control subjects. This suggests that controls were using a strategy different from G.L.'s.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗

Is proprioception important for the timing of motor activities?

This study tested whether a deafferented patient demonstrates impaired timing ability compared with four control subjects. By comparing normal subjects with the deafferented patient, some insight was expected on the importance of proprioception in timing of motor behavior. The protocol was set to enhance the strategy of the subjects in using feedbacks. Subjects had to synchronize finger taps with a sound produced at regular intervals. Once synchronized, the bips were muted and the subjects had to continue the tapping at the same pace. Interresponse interval (IRI) variability was measured under two feedback conditions: with and without vision and auditory feedback. The Wing and Kristofferson model (A.M. Wing and A.B. Kristofferson. Percept. Psychophys. 13(3): 455-460, 1973) was used to segment IRI variance into separate components: a central clock and a peripheral motor delay. When the deafferented patient saw and heard the outcome of her tapping movements, there was a greater variability in successive intervals between taps than when vison and hearing were blocked. We interpret this variability as indicating that the subject used auditory and visual feedback to maintain a correct overall rhythm. The patient may easily substitute visual and (or) auditory feedback for her defective proprioception for movement timing. However, this substitution proved to be inefficient in the limited training period provided in this experiment. The results suggest that the proprioceptive contribution to the time-keeping mechanism presumably depends on the presence of an efference copy signal.

Efferent Pathways↗

Postural adjustments associated with different unloadings of the forearm: effects of proprioceptive and cutaneous afferent deprivation.

Postural adjustments to imposed (passive) and voluntary (active) unloading conditions of the forearm were studied in normal subjects and a deafferented patient. The latency of the postural behaviour (deactivation of the biceps supporting the weight) was linearly related to the displacement amplitude of the unloaded forearm, independent of the unloading conditions. The postural behaviour consisted of an anticipatory postural adjustment (APA) occurring prior to active unloading (in both normals and the patient) and conversely in an unloading reflex response following passive unloading (only in the normals). In both the deafferented and the normal subjects, the amplitudes of the displacement during active unloadings were much smaller (3x) than in the passive conditions and an APA was present in both the deafferented and the normal subjects. The APA could not be triggered by some types of active movement and was absent when the movement was not directly producing the unloading. The EMG latencies of the APA and of the contralateral muscles used to unload were tightly coupled. However, the latency would sometimes be decoupled, particularly when a temporal delay was introduced between the active movement and the unloading in normal subjects. In contrast to the normal subjects, who were able to adapt quickly to an unusual unloading condition (produced by voluntary knee flexion), the deafferented patient did not show an APA in this task. It was concluded that, although the APA is of central origin, it cannot be generated only on the basis of internal timing cues and must rely on afferent information for its generation during unfamiliar unloading conditions.

Adult↗

Control variables and proprioceptive feedback in fast single-joint movement.

Sensorimotor mechanisms were studied on the basis of kinematic and electromyographic data as well as the static torque developed by the muscles as a function of joint angle. The latter relationship is known as the torque/angle characteristic. Fast single-joint movement may result from a shift in this characteristic and a change in its slope. Such movements were studied at the wrist in 9 normal and 1 deafferented subject. After training to flex the wrist to a target, subjects repeated the same movements but in random test trials movements were opposed by the load generated by linear position feedback to a torque motor. At the end of the loaded trials, the load was suddenly removed. In the second experiment, subjects made wrist movements to the target that were opposed by the load and, on random test trials, the movements were not loaded. In these test trials, the wrist arrived in a static position outside the target zone. In both experiments, subjects were instructed not to correct errors. The final torque/angle characteristics specified in the movements were reconstructed on the basis of the static wrist positions and torques before and after unloading. Normal subjects made movements by shifting the position of the torque/angle characteristic and by increasing its slope. If subjects indeed maintained the same pattern of control variables (descending commands), the same final position of the characteristic would be reproduced from trial to trial regardless of load perturbations. This assumption of equifinality was tested by comparing the final position of the wrist in nonloaded movements with that after removal of the load in loaded movements. Equifinality was observed in normal subjects. Movements in the deafferented subject were also associated with a shift of the torque/angle characteristic and a change in its slope. However, she was unable to consistently reproduce its final position. In spite of muscle coactivation, her maximal stiffness was lower than in normal subjects. In the absence of vision, the subject made movements with the load by increasing the slope of the characteristic instead of by shifting its position far enough. Load perturbation affected her final wrist position (inequifinality), which may reflect the presence of a significant hysteresis of the characteristic as a result of the absence of stretch reflexes. The deficits following deafferentation presumably result from the destruction of biomechanical and sensorimotor mechanisms including the ability of control variables to specify the positional frame of reference for afferent and descending systems.

Adult↗

Perception of passive whole-body rotations in the absence of neck and body proprioception.

1. This study investigated whether accurate perception of body rotation after passive horizontal whole-body rotations in the dark requires the integration of both vestibular and neck-body proprioceptive signals. 2. In the first experiment, the gain of the vestibuloocular reflex (VOR) of normal subjects ("controls") and of a patient without proprioception of the neck and body muscles was assessed by the use of pulse and sinusoidal stimulation. In the second experiment, the subjects reported verbally the magnitude of the body rotations. Finally, in the third experiment, they shifted gaze to the position fixated before the rotation ("vestibular memory-contingent saccades" paradigm). 3. The VOR gain of the patient was similar to that of controls, although the body rotations of the patient were largely overestimated, regardless of whether the patient reported the perceived magnitude verbally or through a gaze shift toward the position gazed at before the rotation. 4. These results suggest that neck muscle proprioception contributes to the vestibular signal calibration at the perceptual level necessary for determining body orientation accurately after rotations in the dark.

Afferent Pathways↗