Biomedical subjects

Y Tabe

Publications and source records attributed to Y Tabe.

18 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1997

[Nationwide survey of susceptibilities of clinical isolates to antibacterial agents in 1992].

This study was conducted to investigate susceptibilities of clinical isolates to imipenem (IPM) and other antibacterial agents in 144 hospital laboratories throughout Japan from September to December of 1992. In this study, the isolates were identified and susceptibility tests were performed at individual laboratories. The susceptibility tests were performed using the disk dilution method recommended by NCCLS. S. aureus (including MRSA) strains were highly susceptible to arbekacin (ABK) and netilmicin (NTL). S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae were susceptible to most of the agents tested. E. faecalis were highly susceptible to penicillins and imipenem (IPM). P. aeruginosa showed high susceptibility to ceftazidime (CAZ), IPM and amikacin (AMK). Annual changes in antimicrobial susceptibility patterns over 5 years (1988-1992) were examined. The frequency of sensitive strains of S. aureus to methicillin (DMPPC) has slightly increased from 1991 to 1992. A moderate increases of PCG-insensitive S. pneumoniae was observed. B. fragilis group showed a slight increase in sensitivity to minocycline (MINO) but no yearly changes in IPM sensitivity was observed.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

PubMed1995

[Nationwide survey on susceptibilities of clinical isolates to antibacterial agents in 1991].

This study was conducted to investigate susceptibilities of clinical isolates to different antibacterial agents at 123 hospital laboratories throughout Japan from September to December of 1991. In this study, identifications and susceptibility testings were carried out at each hospital laboratory. The susceptibility testing were performed using the disk dilution method recommended by NCCLS. Staphylococcus aureus and CNS showed high or moderate resistance rates to methicillin (DMPPC). Streptococcus pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Proteus mirabilis were highly susceptible to many agents including beta-lactam antibiotics. Though Enterococcus faecalis was highly susceptible to ampicillin (ABPC), piperacillin (PIPC), imipenem (IPM), sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (ST) compounds, Enterococcus faecium was resistant to almost all antibacterial agents but to ST compounds. High susceptibility rates were observed for strains of Enterobacter cloacae to IPM, gentamicin (GM) and ofloxacin (OFLX) and for strains of Proteus vulgaris to latamoxef (LMOX), IPM, aztreonam (AZT), GM and OFLX. Serratia marcescens and Bacteroides fragilis group were highly susceptible only to IPM. Pseudomonas aeruginosa were sensitive to ceftazidime (CAZ), IPM, amikacin (AMK) and tobramycin (TOB). Pseudomonas cepacia was relatively susceptible only to CAZ. IPM showed strong antibacterial activity to many species except for S. aureus and CNS.

Bacteria↗

PubMed1994

[Susceptibilities of glucose non-fermentative gram-negative bacilli to antibiotics].

Glucose non-fermentative Gram-negative bacilli are important nosocomial pathogens. This study concerned with susceptibilities to antibacterial agents of strains of Glucose non-fermentative Gram-negative bacilli that were isolated from cultures of clinical materials at 123 hospital laboratories throughout Japan from September to December of 1991. The tests for susceptibilities were performed according to the disk dilution method recommended by NCCLS. The following bacteria were tested: Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pseudomonas cepacia, Acinetobacter calcoaceticus, Alcaligenes spp., Alcaligenes xylosoxidans, Flavobacterium spp. and Xanthomonas maltophilia. The antibacterial agents tested were as follows: piperacillin (PIPC), ceftazidime (CAZ), aztreonam (AZT), imipenem (IPM), minocycline (MINO), gentamicin, amikacin (AMK) and ofloxacin (OFLX). 1. Eighty percent of the strains of P. aeruginosa and P. cepacia were sensitive to CAZ. More than ninety percent of the strains of A. calcoaceticus were sensitive to IPM, MINO, OFLX. To PIPC and IPM, about eighty percent of the strains of Alcaligenes spp. and A. xylosoxidans were sensitive. The strains of Flavobacterium spp. and X. maltophilia showed high sensitivities to MINO. 2. Annual changes in antimicrobial susceptibility patterns over 4 years (1988-1991) show that there has been a gradual increase in sensitive strains of P. aeruginosa to PIPC, CAZ and AMK. Sensitive strains of P. cepacia to AZT, IPM and MINO, and A. calcoaceticus to CAZ and MINO also have gradually increased. No yearly changes were observed in high sensitivity to MINO of the strains of Flavobacterium spp. and X. maltophilia.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

PubMed1985