PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Y Vandenplas

Publications and source records attributed to Y Vandenplas.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Oligosaccharides in infant formula.

Breast-feeding is the golden standard for infant feeding. However, the majority of a few week old infants are fed with a second choice infant feeding, cow's milk based formula. Amongst the multiple differences between human and cow's milk regards the development of the gastro-intestinal flora: the flora of the breast-fed infant being richer in bifidobacteria and lactobacilli. Both species are known to be potentially beneficial for the health of the host. The absence of oligosaccharides, the third largest component in human milk, in cow's milk is likely to account for the differences in colonic flora. The oligosaccharide content and concentration in breast milk is - just as for the other macronutrients - a dynamic process, making it impossible for industry to mimic nature. However, if the composition cannot be mimicked, the effect and function can be imitated. The addition of two oligosaccharides, galacto-oligosaccharides and inulin, to cow's milk based infant formula has been shown to have a bifidogenic effect, and to stimulate the growth of bifidi and lactobacilli. In conclusion, the addition of oligosaccharides to cow's milk based infant formula brings this alternative, second choice infant feeding one step closer to the golden standard of human milk. But, prolonged breast-feeding should still be promoted with maximum effort.

Animals↗

Management of ingested foreign bodies in childhood and review of the literature.

UNLABELLED: The management of ingested foreign bodies in children is not standardised. During a 15-year period, we recorded 325 consecutive paediatric cases of accidental ingestion of foreign bodies or with symptoms suggesting oesophageal obstruction presented at the emergency department or the paediatric gastroenterology unit. The foreign bodies that had to be removed were, in decreasing order of frequency: coins, toy parts, jewels, batteries, sharp materials such as needles and pins, fish and chicken bones, and "large" amounts of food. Only 54% of the patients had transient symptoms at the moment of ingestion, such as retrosternal pain, cyanosis and dysphagia. A minority (28, 9%) of foreign bodies could be removed with a McGill forceps; 65 (20%) were removed with a magnet probe. Endoscopic removal was performed in 82 cases (25%). In the majority of cases (150, 46%) natural elimination occurred. The outcome of all patients was uneventful. CONCLUSION: Recommendations for management of children presenting with a history of suspected accidental ingestion of a foreign body for the community paediatrician are proposed.

Adolescent↗

The role of Helicobacter pylori in paediatrics.

Helicobacter pylori is a bacterium that colonizes the human stomach, especially during childhood. Although it has been studied intensively during the past decade, many controversies still exist on many important issues, including the clinical relevance of virulence factors, indications for treatment, recommended procedures for diagnosis and the typical symptom profile, among others. The lack of double-blind, placebo-controlled studies in children illustrates the paucity of hard scientific data, and is the major reason for differences in opinion. Therefore, the present review of literature published during the past 2 years raises many questions.

Adolescent↗

PH monitoring in the distal and proximal esophagus in symptomatic infants.

BACKGROUND: Standard distal esophageal pH monitoring data are sometimes within normal ranges in children with clinically suspected gastroesophageal reflux disease. Therefore, the authors hypothesized that the amount of acid reflux reaching the proximal esophagus may be greater in some subgroups of patients than in healthy controls or in other subgroups of patients. METHODS: The parameters of 24-hour pH monitoring in the proximal part of the esophagus were analyzed in 120 symptomatic infants in who the reflux parameters in the lower esophagus were clearly within normal ranges (reflux index < 5.0%). The infants were classified into four patient groups: excessive regurgitation (n = 41): inconsolable crying (n = 31), apparent life-threatening event (ALTE) (n = 18), and chronic respiratory disorders (n = 30). The control group consisted also of 120 infants. The following parameters were calculated: reflux index, the number of reflux episodes, the number of reflux episodes lasting longer than 5 minutes, the duration of the longest reflux episode, and the acid clearance time (ACT, duration of reflux episodes divided by number of reflux episodes). RESULTS: The patients with chronic respiratory disorders were significantly older than the patients in the other groups and the controls. In the distal esophagus, there was no statistically significant difference between the reflux parameters. As could be expected, every parameter was statistically (paired t test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test) significantly smaller in the proximal than in the distal esophagus, except for the ACT in infants who presented with inconsolable crying. In the proximal esophagus, there was no statistically significant difference between the different patient subgroups or controls, except for the number of reflux episodes in the group with chronic respiratory disorders and the group with inconsolable crying, applying one-way analysis of variance. As determined by applying the Mann-Whitney test, the number of reflux episodes in the upper esophagus was significantly higher in the group with chronic respiratory disorders than in the other patient groups and controls. Therefore, the authors' data do not support the hypothesis that reflux reaching the proximal esophagus is a frequent cause of ALTE. However, the data may suggest that the number of reflux episodes reaching the proximal esophagus in children with chronic respiratory disorders and with distal pH monitoring data within normal ranges may be increased. Whether this finding reflects reality or a statistical coincidence, or is influenced by the older age of this patient group, needs further evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: In theory, dual simultaneous esophageal pH monitoring in the distal and proximal esophagus may increase the diagnostic accuracy of pH monitoring in infants. Our results do not support a substantial advantage of a systematic application of this new technique, especially not in infants presenting with ALTE, excessive regurgitation, or inconsolable crying. In the subgroup of patients with chronic respiratory disorders, more data are needed before conclusions can be determined and recommendations can be made.

Cohort Studies↗

Cisapride plasma levels and corrected QT interval in infants undergoing routine polysomnography.

BACKGROUND: Reported QTc prolongation associated with cardiac arrhythmia in a small number of children undergoing cisapride therapy and lack of pharmacokinetic correlation provided the impetus for this prospective study. The authors evaluated the relation between cisapride plasma concentrations, the electrocardiographic QT interval, and cardiac rhythm in infants undergoing routine 8-hour polysomnography. METHODS: A total of 211 infants were enrolled: 84 (17 born prematurely) undergoing cisapride therapy for at least 4 days for suspected gastroesophageal reflux and 127 controls (10 born prematurely), aged between 1 week and 13.5 months. Infants underwent continuous bipolar limb lead I recording during routine 8-hour polysomnography. QT intervals and heart rate were measured at hourly intervals. The morning after polysomnography, 12-lead electrocardiography was performed (1 hour after cisapride administration). Cisapride plasma concentrations were determined immediately before and 1 to 2 hours after administration. Serum electrolyte concentrations were measured. RESULTS: The administered cisapride dose ranged from 0.35 to 1.55 (mean, 0.81, median 0.79) mg. kg-1. d-1. Cisapride plasma concentrations were significantly higher in infants younger than 3 months of age. Cisapride-treated infants younger than 3 months of age had longer QTc intervals compared with age-matched controls. Heart rate was similar for cisapride-treated and control infants. No arrhythmia or atrioventricular conduction abnormalities were observed. CONCLUSIONS: At comparable doses of cisapride and comparable plasma concentrations, the QTc was significantly higher in infants younger than 3 months of age. This confirms age-dependent cisapride pharmacokinetics in the first 10 to 12 weeks strongly correlated with changes in body weight and may also suggest an altered ability of infants younger than 3 months of age to metabolize cisapride. The clinical significance and risk of the increased QTc interval is unclear. Cisapride should be judiciously prescribed in infants younger than the age of 3 months and electrocardiography should be performed before and during therapy.

Age Factors↗

The effect of cisapride on the corrected QT interval and QT dispersion in premature infants.

BACKGROUND: Cisapride is used frequently in premature neonates as a gastrointestinal prokinetic drug. Concerns exist, however, about its safety because of its effect on the QT interval. Premature infants could be at higher risk for side effects because of their immaturity. This prospective study investigated the pharmacokinetics of cisapride and its effects on corrected QT interval (QTc) and QT dispersion in premature infants. METHODS: Electrocardiogram examination was performed just before and after 72 hours of treatment with cisapride (0.2 mg/kg per dose, four times daily) in 10 premature infants. Trough and anticipated peak plasma level of cisapride and norcisapride were quantified after 72 hours of treatment. Results were compared with a cohort of 41 term infants aged 0 to 3 months receiving cisapride treatment. RESULTS: The QTc interval increased significantly from 423 ms to 461 ms after 72 hours of treatment (P = 0.0007). No effect was seen on QT dispersion (44.3 ms vs. 45.9 ms). The change in QTc interval was inversely related to postnatal age (R2 = 0.52; P = 0.02), whereas there was no correlation with gestational age or plasma levels of cisapride or norcisapride. Trough and anticipated peak plasma levels of cisapride and norcisapride were significantly higher in the premature infants compared with the term infants aged 0 to 3 months (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Premature infants less than 1 month of age could be at higher risk for cardiac side effects of cisapride when used in the same dosage as in older infants. The daily dose should be reduced (0.1 mg/kg per dose, maximum four times daily), and the QTc interval should be monitored closely. The benefits and safety of cisapride in premature infants less than 1 month of age should be reconsidered.

Age Factors↗

Efficacy and tolerability of cisapride in children.

As gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) in infants and children is a motility disorder which differs in pathophysiology and clinical course from GORD in adults, prokinetics should be considered the drug of choice in certain circumstances. Indeed, cisapride may result in improvement of feeding tolerance in premature infants. Cisapride has a better tolerability profile than a 'wait-and-see-if-improvement-comes-spontaneously' policy or the other therapeutic options available. A careful and critical review of published data suggests that cisapride may have a QTc-prolonging effect. However, provided the precautions for cisapride administration are followed, the QTc-prolonging effect remains consistently without clinically relevant adverse effects. Correct dosage and avoidance of concurrent treatment with macrolides and/or azoles are the most relevant tolerability recommendations in children. Although there is a need for a prokinetic with better efficacy, cisapride is currently the prokinetic with the best benefit-to-risk ratio available. Thus, withdrawal of cisapride would result in a significantly increased risk for severe complications in infants and children with GORD or other gastrointestinal motility disorders such as chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction, gastroparesis and feed intolerance in premature infants.

Child↗

Gastro-oesophageal reflux, sleep pattern, apparent life threatening event and sudden infant death. The point of view of a gastro-enterologist.

UNLABELLED: Sudden infant death, apparent life threatening events and regurgitation occur mostly during the first 6 months of life, making it very tempting to suspect a relation between these phenomena. According to epidemiological data, the role of gastro-oesophageal reflux in the aetiology of apparent life threatening events is unclear. It has been demonstrated that sudden infant death is decreased in the supine versus the prone sleeping position. On the contrary, gastro-oesophageal reflux is more pronounced in the supine than in the prone position, both in infants and in older children, both in infants with physiological and with pathological reflux. In the supine position, infants do sleep shorter, have more rapid-eye-movement sleep and have more arousals than in the prone position. CONCLUSION: It is thought that in the majority of infants, gastro-oesophageal reflux stimulates arousals and thus may well be considered as "protective" for rather than "provoking" sudden infant death. However, this hypothesis needs to be validated.

Age Factors↗

Diagnosis and treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in infants and children.

Gastro-oesophageal reflux is a frequent, aspecific phenomenon in infants and children. The recommended approach in infants with uncomplicated regurgitation consists of reassurance of the parents and, if this fails, dietary recommendations in formula-fed infants. If, despite these efforts, symptoms persist, administration of prokinetics, such as cisapride, is recommended prior to investigations such as oesophageal pH monitoring. Oesophageal pH monitoring is also recommended to document gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in children with unusual presentations such as chronic respiratory disease. Today, cisapride is the drug of choice because it has the best efficacy and safety profile. In infants and children presenting with symptoms suggesting oesophagitis, endoscopy of the upper gastrointestinal tract is recommended. If there is severe oesophagitis, acid suppression with histamine H2-receptor antagonists or proton pump inhibitors in combination with prokinetics, are recommended. In life-threatening situations, or in patients that are resistant to or dependent on acid-suppressive medication, a surgical procedure such as laparascopic Nissen procedure should be considered.

Child↗

Oesophageal pH monitoring in infants: elimination of gastric buffering does not modify reflux index.

BACKGROUND: Oesophageal pH monitoring is considered to be the gold standard investigation in the diagnosis of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Results of pH monitoring in regurgitating infants, however, may be within normal ranges. Therefore it was hypothesized that prolonged buffering of gastric acidity caused by milk-feeding may falsely normalize the pH data. Therefore, it may be relevant to omit the periods of gastric acid buffering in the analysis of the oesophageal pH monitoring data. METHODS: Combined gastric and oesophageal pH monitoring (Digitrapper Mark III, two-channel antimony electrode, Synectics) was performed in 90 consecutive infants, 0.5-10 months old, who were referred to the unit by outdoor paediatricians for pH measurement. The data were analysed in three different ways. The reflux index (RI), or the percentage time that the pH in the oesophagus was < 4.0, was calculated in three different ways: (i) the total duration of the investigation; (ii) excluding 90-min postprandial periods, starting from the beginning of a feeding; and (iii) excluding all periods with a gastric pH > 4.0, which are the periods of gastric buffering with a theoretical impossibility of recording an oesophageal pH < 4.0. RESULTS: The mean duration of the pHmetries was 19.20+/-2.01h (A; mean +/- 1 SD), with a RI of 5.38+/-5.39% (B; median 3.45%). If the 90-min postprandial periods were not considered, the mean duration decreased to 12.21+/-2.41h (C; P(A vs C) < 0.001), with an oesophageal RI of 6.82+/-6.57% (D; median: 4.65; P(B vs D) = NS; r (B vs D) = 0.97). If all periods with a gastric pH > 4.0 were elminated, the duration available for analysis of the data with a gastric pH < 4.0 was 12.53+/-4.00 h (E; P(A vs E) < 0.001; P(C vs E) = NS), with an oesophageal RI of 7.06+/-7.52% (F; median: 4.50; P(B vs D vs F) = NS; r(B vs F), (D vs F) = 0.96). CONCLUSION: Overall the data do not support a benefit from including periods of gastric buffering in the routine analysis of oesophageal pH monitoring data. Therefore standard oesophageal pH monitoring should be with a single electrode and should not include periods of gastric buffering.

Cisapride↗

Normal ranges of continuous pH monitoring in the proximal esophagus.

BACKGROUND: To determine normal ranges of gastroesophageal reflux (GER) in the proximal esophagus, measured with continuous pH monitoring. Normal ranges in the distal esophagus have been published. Because esophageal pH monitoring is frequently performed in children with atypical manifestations such as chronic respiratory disease, and because one of the possible pathophysiologic mechanisms may be (micro-)aspiration, it may be relevant to establish normal ranges in the proximal esophagus. METHODS: Twenty-four-hour pH monitoring was performed in 200 children with suspected GER disease. The mean age of the patients was 4.5 months (range, 0.5-17.0 months). After initial analysis, patients were divided into three groups according to the reflux index (RI) in the distal esophagus, because it could be speculated that the amount of reflux reaching the proximal esophagus depends on the amount of reflux in the distal esophagus: Group I (n: 120) children had a distal RI of less than 5% and were considered normal, group II (n:50) had a distal RI of 5% to 10% and was considered to have intermediate disease, and group III (n:30) had a distal RI of more than 10% and was regarded as pathologic. The following parameters are calculated: the RI, the total number of reflux episodes, the number of reflux episodes lasting more than 5 minutes, the duration of the longest reflux episode, and the acid clearance time (ACT). RESULTS: The median RI in the distal esophagus was 3.8 +/- 0.34 (standard error of the mean [SEM]), and in the proximal esophagus, the RI was 1.2 +/- 0.23. In group I patients, the RI in the proximal esophagus was 0.5% +/- 0.09%, in group II the RI increased significantly to 2.75% +/- 0.34% (P [group I compared with group II] < 0.01), and in group III the RI was 6.15% +/- 0.96% (P [II-III] < 0.01). The number of acid reflux episodes in group I was 17.0 +/- 2.27, in group II the number increased to 62.5 +/- 8.18 (P [I-II] < 0.01), and in group III it reached 102.0 +/- 23.9 (P [II-III] < 0.05). Also the duration of the longest reflux episodes and the number of reflux episodes lasting more than 5 minutes increased from group I to group II, and from group II to group III. The ACT was shorter in the proximal esophagus (group I 0.3 +/- 0.06 minutes; group II 0.48 +/- 0.07 minutes, P [I-II] = not significant [NS]; group III 0.56 +/- 0.17 minutes P [II-III] = NS) than in the distal esophagus (group I 0.49 +/- 0.03 minutes, P [proximal ACT compared with distal ACT] < 0.05; Group II 0.76 +/- 0.05 minutes, P [proximal-distal] < 0.01; Group III 0.89 +/- 0.09 minutes, P [proximal-distal] = NS) suggesting more effective esophageal clearance in the proximal esophagus. CONCLUSIONS: Protection of the proximal esophagus from acid reflux is significantly related to the incidence and duration of reflux measured in the distal esophagus. These normal ranges in the upper esophagus will be helpful in the interpretation of upper esophageal pH monitoring data.

Esophagus↗