PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Y Wafai

Publications and source records attributed to Y Wafai.

10 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Preoxygenation with tidal volume and deep breathing techniques: the impact of duration of breathing and fresh gas flow.

UNLABELLED: Various techniques of "preoxygenation" before anesthetic induction have been advocated, including tidal volume breathing (TVB) for 3-5 min, four deep breaths (DB) in 0.5 min, and eight DB in 1 min. However, no study has compared the effectiveness of these techniques, assessed extending deep breathing beyond 1 min, or investigated the influence of fresh gas flow (FGF) in the same subjects using a circle absorber system. In 24 healthy adult volunteers breathing oxygen from a circle absorber system by tight-fitting mask, we compared TVB/5 min and deep breathing at a rate of 4 DB/0.5 min for 2 min at 5, 7, and 10 L/min FGF. Inspired and end-tidal respiratory gases were measured at 0.5-min intervals. During TVB, end-tidal oxygen (ETO2) increased rapidly and plateaued by 2.5 min at 86%, 88%, and 88% with 5, 7 and 10 L/min FGF, respectively. ETO2 values of > or =90% were attained between 3 and 4 min. Four DB/0.5 min increased ETO2 to 75%, 77%, and 80% at 5, 7, and 10 L/min FGF. Eight DB/min resulted in ETO2 values of 82% and 87% at 7 and 10 L/min, respectively. Extending deep breathing to 1.5 and 2 min with 10 L/min FGF increased ETO2 by > or =90%, although a decrease in ETCo(2) was noted. We concluded that TVB/3-5 min was effective in achieving maximal "preoxygenation" whereas 4 DB/0.5 min resulted in submaximal "preoxygenation," and thus should be used only when time is limited. Increasing FGF from 5 to 10 L/min does not enhance "preoxygenation" with either TVB or 4 DB/0.5 min. Deep breathing yields maximal "preoxygenation" when extended to 1.5 or 2 min, and only when high (10 L/min) FGF is used. IMPLICATIONS: Using a circle absorber system, normal breathing of oxygen for 3-5 min achieves optimal oxygenation of the lungs; whereas 4 deep breaths in 30 s does not. However, extending deep breathing to 1.5-2 min and using a high flow of oxygen improves oxygenation of the lungs to the same degree as normal breathing for 3-5 min. This may have important implications for patient safety.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Efficacy of preoxygenation with tidal volume breathing. Comparison of breathing systems.

BACKGROUND: Preoxygenation before tracheal intubation is intended to increase oxygen reserves and delay the onset of hypoxemia during apnea. Various systems are used for preoxygenation. Designed specifically for preoxygenation, the NasOral system uses a small nasal mask for inspiration and a mouthpiece for exhalation. One-way valves in the nasal mask and the mouthpiece ensure unidirectional flow. This investigation compares the efficacy of preoxygenation using the standard circle system with the NasOral system and five different resuscitation bags. METHODS: Twenty consenting, healthy volunteers were studied in the supine position for 5-min periods of tidal volume breathing using the circle absorber system, the NasOral system, and five resuscitation bags in a randomized order. Data were collected during room air breathing and at 30-s intervals during 5 min of oxygen administration. Inspired oxygen, end-tidal oxygen, and end-tidal nitrogen were measured by mass spectrometry. RESULTS: At 2. 5 min of oxygenation, end-tidal oxygen plateaued at 88.1 +/- 4.8 and 89.3 +/- 6.4% (mean +/- SD) for the circle absorber and NasOral systems, respectively. This was associated with inverse decreases in end-tidal nitrogen. At no time did these end-tidal oxygen or nitrogen values differ from each other. Three of the resuscitation bags (one disk type and two duck-bill type with one-way exhalation valves) delivered inspired oxygen more than 90%, and the end-tidal oxygen plateaued between 77 and 89% at 2 min of tidal volume breathing. The other two resuscitation bags (both duck-bill bags without exhalation valves) delivered inspired oxygen less than 40%, and the end-tidal oxygen values ranged between 21.8 +/- 5.0 and 31.9 +/- 8.7%. CONCLUSIONS: The circle absorber and NasOral systems were equally effective in achieving maximal preoxygenation during tidal volume breathing. Resuscitation bags differed markedly in effectiveness during preoxygenation; those with duck-bill valves without one-way exhalation valves were the least effective. Thus, the use of these bags should be avoided for preoxygenation.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Efficacy of the self-inflating bulb in confirming tracheal intubation in the morbidly obese.

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to determine the incidence of false-negative and false-positive results when the self-inflating bulb (SIB) is used to differentiate tracheal from esophageal intubation in morbidly obese patients using two techniques. In technique 1, the SIB is compressed before it is connected to the tube; in technique 2, the SIB is compressed after connection to the tube. METHODS: With institutional review board approval, 54 consenting adult morbidly obese patients (body mass index > 35) undergoing elective surgical procedures were included in the study. After anesthetic induction and muscle relaxation, both the trachea and esophagus were intubated under direct vision with identical cuffed tubes. The efficacy of the SIB in verifying the position of both tubes was tested by a second anesthesiologist. The speed of reinflation was graded as rapid ( < 4 s) or none ( > 4 s), using both techniques. In the case of tracheal intubation, the absence of reinflation was recorded as a false-negative, whereas in cases of esophageal intubation, rapid reinflation was recorded as a false-positive. Identification of tube location by the second anesthesiologist was based on SIB reinflation results from techniques 1 and 2, as well as the presence of a flatuslike sound elicited by technique 2 in esophageally placed tubes. All patients were retested by the SIB after receiving three breaths of 400-500 ml each. In all patients exhibiting false-negative results, six obese patients exhibiting true-positive results, and four nonobese patients exhibiting true-positive results, tracheal responses to the SIB maneuvers were observed directly by a flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope incorporating an airtight system, 15-20 min after mechanical ventilation was instituted. RESULTS: The incidence of false-negative results was initially 30% with technique 1 and 11% with technique 2, but decreased to 4% when technique 2 was used after the delivery of three breaths. The second anesthesiologist initially identified tube location in 92.5% of patients correctly. After the delivery of three breaths, tube location was correctly identified in 96.3% of patients. Fiberoptic bronchoscopic examination of the patients exhibiting false-negative results revealed exaggerated inward bulging of the posterior tracheal membrane during reinflation of the SIB when technique 1 was used. CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to previous investigations in healthy patients, the current study demonstrates a high incidence of false-negative results when the SIB is used to confirm tracheal intubation in morbidly obese patients. If the SIB is used, the technique should include compression of the SIB after connection to the tube and should be used in conjunction with other clinical signs and technical aids. The mechanism of false-negative results in these patients seems to be related to reduction of caliber of airways secondary to a marked decrease in functional residual capacity, and collapse of large airways due to invagination of the posterior tracheal wall when sub-atmospheric pressure is generated by the SIB.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1995

Effectiveness of the self-inflating bulb for verification of proper placement of the Esophageal Tracheal Combitube.

The esophageal tracheal Combitube (ETC; Sheridan Catheter Corporation, Argyle, NY) is a twin-lumen tube used to establish emergency ventilation. After blind placement, ventilation is performed via the proximal lumen if it is in the esophagus or via the distal lumen if it is in the trachea. This investigation was designed to test the reliability of the self-inflating bulb (SIB) in identifying the location of the ETC and facilitating its proper positioning in anesthetized patients. In Group 1 (n = 26), the ETC was introduced blindly. In Group 2 (n = 20), the tube was placed in the trachea (eight patients) or once in the trachea and once in the esophagus, randomly (12 patients) under direct vision rigid laryngoscopy by the anesthesiologist performing the intubation. In both groups, the efficacy of the SIB in identifying the location of the ETC was tested by a second blinded anesthesiologist. In Group 1, blind insertion of the ETC resulted in esophageal placement in all patients, and in each case was correctly identified. The second anesthesiologist reported no reinflation when the compressed SIB was connected to the distal lumen. When the compressed SIB was connected to the proximal lumen, instantaneous reinflation was observed in 23 patients, delayed reinflation (2-4 s) in two and no reinflation (> 4 s) in one patient. Instantaneous reinflation occurred in these three patients after repositioning of the ETC. In Group 2, the second anesthesiologist correctly identified the location of the ETC in all cases. The results confirm previous findings that blind introduction of the ETC leads to esophageal placement and yields adequate ventilation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adolescent↗
PubMed1994

Efficacy of the self-inflating bulb in detecting esophageal intubation. Does the presence of a nasogastric tube or cuff deflation make a difference?

BACKGROUND: The principle underlying the use of the self-inflating bulb in differentiating esophageal from tracheal intubation is that the trachea is held open by rigid cartilaginous rings, whereas the esophagus collapses when a negative pressure is applied to its lumen. This investigation was designed to test the efficacy of the bulb in detecting esophageal intubation in the presence of a nasogastric tube and after tracheal tube cuff deflation. METHODS: In anesthetized patients, the trachea and esophagus were intubated with identical tubes. The efficacy of the bulb was tested after a nasogastric tube was placed (group 1, n = 70) and after cuff deflation (group 2, n = 60) by a second anesthesiologist. RESULTS: In patients with nasogastric tubes (group 1), the anesthesiologists reported no reinflation of the compressed bulbs connected to tubes placed in the esophagus and immediate reinflation when connected to tracheally placed tubes in every case. In group 2, the determination of tube placement was correct in every case after cuff deflation. Mean (+/- SEM) negative pressures generated when compressed bulbs were connected to esophageally placed tubes were 57.8 +/- 0.48 mmHg (group 1) and 55.3 +/- 0.52 mmHg (group 2) and remained unchanged after the introduction of nasogastric tubes or after cuff deflation. CONCLUSIONS: These results confirm that a nasogastric tube or cuff deflation does not interfere with the reliability of the self-inflating bulb in detecting esophageal intubation and thus does not contribute to false positive results. Confirmation of tracheal tube placement by this simple method makes it ideal for use with other recognized methods both in and outside the operating rooms and enables physicians and emergency personnel to proceed with other resuscitative measures.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1993

Use of the self-inflating bulb for detecting esophageal intubation after "esophageal ventilation".

This present investigation tests the efficacy of the self-inflating bulb for detecting esophageal intubation after intentional "esophageal ventilation" to mimic gastric insufflation after bag-and-mask ventilation. In 72 anesthetized patients, the trachea and esophagus were intubated with identical tubes. The efficacy of the bulb was tested by a second anesthesiologist before and after the delivery of three breaths at a tidal volume of 300-350 mL each. The pressures generated by the bulb connected to esophageally placed tubes were measured in 10 patients. In all patients, the second anesthesiologist reported no reinflation of the bulbs when connected to esophageally placed tubes and instantaneous reinflation when connected to tracheally placed tubes, thus correctly identifying the location of each tube. The mean negative pressure generated when compressed bulbs were connected to esophageally placed tubes was 55.4 +/- 1.2 mm Hg before esophageal ventilation and 59.0 +/- 0.68 mm Hg after esophageal ventilation. We conclude that insufflation of the stomach as a result of esophageal ventilation, to the extent demonstrated in this study, does not interfere with the effectiveness of the bulb in differentiating esophageal from tracheal intubation.

Adult↗