Biomedical subjects

Ya Wang

Publications and source records attributed to Ya Wang.

28 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed2003

An overactivated ATR/CHK1 pathway is responsible for the prolonged G2 accumulation in irradiated AT cells.

Induction of checkpoint responses in G1, S, and G2 phases of the cell cycle after exposure of cells to ionizing radiation (IR) is essential for maintaining genomic integrity. Ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) plays a key role in initiating this response in all three phases of the cell cycle. However, cells lacking functional ATM exhibit a prolonged G2 arrest after IR, suggesting regulation by an ATM-independent checkpoint response. The mechanism for this ataxia telangiectasia (AT)-independent G2-checkpoint response remains unknown. We report here that the G2 checkpoint in irradiated human AT cells derives from an overactivation of the ATR/CHK1 pathway. Chk1 small interfering RNA abolishes the IR-induced prolonged G2 checkpoint and radiosensitizes AT cells to killing. These results link the activation of ATR/CHK1 with the prolonged G2 arrest in AT cells and show that activation of this G2 checkpoint contributes to the survival of AT cells.

Alkaloids↗

PubMed2003

Caffeine could not efficiently sensitize homologous recombination repair-deficient cells to ionizing radiation-induced killing.

Caffeine inhibits ATM and ATR, two important checkpoint regulators, abolishes ionizing radiation-induced checkpoint response, and radiosensitizes cells. Radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are repaired by two major processes, homologous recombination repair (HRR) and nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ). It remains unclear which repair process, HRR or NHEJ, is affected when the checkpoint responses are abolished by caffeine. In this study we observed the effect of caffeine on gene-targeted DT40 chicken lymphoblast cells. We show that caffeine efficiently abolishes S- and G(2)-phase checkpoint responses after irradiation in all cell lines tested and greatly radiosensitizes wild-type and ATM(-/-) cells, the partially checkpoint-deficient cells. However, caffeine has a much smaller radiosensitizing effect on RAD54(-/-) cells and has no effect on RAD51-deficient cells. RAD51 and RAD54 are the important factors for HRR. Our results indicate that the checkpoint responses abolished by caffeine (S and G(2)) mainly affect HRR, which results in cell radiosensitization.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

Caffeine-induced radiosensitization is independent of nonhomologous end joining of DNA double-strand breaks.

After exposure to ionizing radiation, proliferating cells actively slow down progression through the cell cycle through the activation of checkpoints to provide time for repair. Two major complementary DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair pathways exist in mammalian cells, homologous recombination repair (HRR) and nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ). The relationship between checkpoint activation and these two types of DNA DSB repair pathways is not clear. Caffeine, as a nonspecific inhibitor of ATM and ATR, abolishes multi-checkpoint responses and sensitizes cells to radiation-induced killing. However, it remains unknown which DNA repair process, NHEJ or HRR, or both, is affected by caffeine-abolished checkpoint responses. We report here that caffeine abolishes the radiation-induced G(2)-phase checkpoint and efficiently sensitizes both NHEJ-proficient and NHEJ-deficient mammalian cells to radiation-induced killing without affecting NHEJ. Our results indicate that caffeine-induced radiosensitization occurs by affecting an NHEJ-independent process, possibly HRR.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Ku affects the CHK1-dependent G(2) checkpoint after ionizing radiation.

There are two major pathways for repairing DNA double strand breaks in mammalian cells: nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination repair (HRR). The nonhomologous end joining repair is deficient in cells without Ku, whereas HRR is highly efficient in such cells compared with their wild-type counterparts. The mechanism remains unclear. We reported previously that Ku80(-/-) cells show a stronger ATM-dependent S-phase checkpoint response than Ku80(+/+) cells after ionizing radiation (IR; X-Y. Zhou et al., Oncogene, 21:6377-6381, 2002). We report in this study that Ku80(-/-) cells also show a much stronger G(2) accumulation than Ku80(+/+) cells after IR. The stronger G(2) checkpoint response in Ku80(-/-) cells is ATM independent but is accompanied with a higher activity of CHK1 kinase. Treatment with Chk1 antisense oligonucleotide abolishes the stronger G(2) checkpoint response and sensitizes Ku80(-/-) cells to IR. These data indicate that the stronger G(2) checkpoint response shown in Ku80(-/-) cells is CHK1 dependent and suggest that the CHK1-dependent checkpoint response contributes to the highly efficient HRR in such cells.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Ku affects the ATM-dependent S phase checkpoint following ionizing radiation.

Following exposure to genotoxic stress, proliferating cells actively slow down DNA replication through an S phase checkpoint to provide time for repair. The ATM-dependent pathway plays an important role in the S phase checkpoint response following ionizing irradiation. We report that there is a stronger S phase checkpoint response in irradiated Ku80(-/-) cells as compared with their wild-type counterparts, which has no relationship to DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) activity but correlates with a higher ATM activity and with more ATM bound to chromatin DNA in such cells. Wortmannin, a nonspecific inhibitor of ATM, not only reduces the higher activity of ATM kinase, but also abolishes the stronger S phase checkpoint response in Ku80(-/-) cells. Furthermore, a specific ATM antisense oligonucleotide abolishes the stronger S checkpoint response in Ku80(-/-) cells and renders these cells practically indistinguishable from Ku80(+/+) cells for this endpoint. These results in aggregate indicate that the stronger S checkpoint in irradiated Ku80(-/-) cells is due to the higher ATM kinase activity.

Androstadienes↗

PubMed2002

Ku affects the ataxia and Rad 3-related/CHK1-dependent S phase checkpoint response after camptothecin treatment.

Camptothecin (CPT) that targets DNA topoisomerase I is one of the most promising broad-spectrum anticancer drugs in development today. The cytotoxicity of CPT is S phase (S)-specific because the collision of advancing replication forks with CPT-topoisomerase I-DNA complexes results in DNA damage. After DNA damage, proliferating cells could actively slow down the DNA replication through an S checkpoint to provide time for repair. We report now that there is an activated S checkpoint response in CPT-treated mammalian cells. This response is regulated by Ataxia and Rad3-related (ATR)/CHK1 pathway. Compared with their wild-type counterparts, CPT-treated Ku80-/- cells showed stronger inhibition of DNA replication. This stronger inhibition had no relationship with DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) activity but correlated with the higher activities of ATR and the higher activities of CHK1 in such cells. Not only caffeine, the nonspecific inhibitor of ATR, or UCN-01, the nonspecific inhibitor of CHK1, but also the specific CHK1 antisense oligonucleotide abolished the stronger inhibition of DNA replication in CPT-treated Ku80-/- cells. These results in aggregate indicated that the stronger S checkpoint in CPT-treated Ku80-/- cells is regulated through the highly activated ATR/CHK1 pathway.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

An ATM-independent S-phase checkpoint response involves CHK1 pathway.

After exposure to genotoxic stress, proliferating cells actively slow down the DNA replication through a S-phase checkpoint to provide time for repair. We report that in addition to the ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM)-dependent pathway that controls the fast response, there is an ATM-independent pathway that controls the slow response to regulate the S-phase checkpoint after ionizing radiation in mammalian cells. The slow response of S-phase checkpoint, which is resistant to wortmannin, sensitive to caffeine and UCN-01, and related to cyclin-dependent kinase phosphorylation, is much stronger in CHK1 overexpressed cells, and it could be abolished by Chk1 antisense oligonucleotides. These results provide evidence that the ATM-independent slow response of S-phase checkpoint involves CHK1 pathway.

Ataxia Telangiectasia↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Trans-Golgi network syntaxin 10 functions distinctly from syntaxins 6 and 16.

Syntaxin 10 is a soluble N-ethylmaleimide sensitive factor attachment protein receptor (SNARE) protein localized to the trans-Golgi network (TGN), where two other members of the syntaxin family, syntaxins 6 and 16, also reside. The role of syntaxin 10 in regulating TGN protein traffic is not yet defined. Syntaxin 10 co-localizes well with syntaxins 6 and 16 at the TGN in interphase cells, and appears to interact with both syntaxin 6 and 16 as evidenced by co-immunoprecipitation analyses. However, unlike syntaxin 6 and 16, neither syntaxin 10 antibodies nor its cytosolic domain inhibits endosome-TGN transport of shiga toxin. Syntaxin 16 knockdown with small interfering RNA (siRNA) affects the TGN localization of syntaxin 6 but not syntaxin 10, and clearly inhibits endosome-TGN transport. On the other hand, knockdown of syntaxin 10 expressions had no significant effect on the TGN localization of syntaxin 6 and 16, and did not inhibit endosome-TGN transport. Unlike syntaxin 16, syntaxin 10 does not interact specifically with Vps45, the Sec1/Munc18 (SM) family member at the TGN. On the other hand, syntaxin 10 reciprocally co-immunoprecipitated endosomal syntaxin 12/13, and knockdown of syntaxin 10 expressions affects the surface expression of transferrin receptor (TfR) and seems to induce the formation of an immobile TfR pool. Therefore, in spite of its co-localization and possible interaction with syntaxin 16, syntaxin 10 is not part of the syntaxin 16-based SNARE complex involved in endosome-TGN transport, and may have a hitherto unrecognized function in the TGN-endosome boundary.

Animals↗

PubMedDate not supplied

SNAREs in neurons--beyond synaptic vesicle exocytosis (Review).

The paradigm for soluble N-ethylmaleimide sensitive factor attachment protein receptor (SNARE) function in mammalian cells has been built on advancements in our understanding of structural and biochemical aspects of synaptic vesicle exocytosis, involving specifically synaptobrevin, syntaxin 1 and SNAP25. Interestingly, a good number of SNAREs which are not directly involved in neurotransmitter exocytosis, are either brain-enriched or have distinct neuron-specific functions. Syntaxins 12/13 regulates glutamate receptor recycling via its interaction with neuron-enriched endosomal protein of 21 kDa (NEEP21). TI-VAMP/VAMP7 is essential for neuronal morphogenesis and mediates the vesicular transport processes underlying neurite outgrowth. Ykt6 is highly enriched in the cerebral cortex and hippocampus and is targeted to a novel compartment in neurons. Syntaxin 16 has a moderate expression level in many tissues, but is rather enriched in the brain. Here, we review and discuss the neuron-specific physiology and possible pathology of these and other (such as SNAP-29 and Vti1a-beta) members of the SNARE family.

Animals↗

PubMedDate not supplied

CHK1-regulated S-phase checkpoint response reduces camptothecin cytotoxicity.

The cytotoxicity of camptothecin (CPT) is S phase specific and is associated with an inhibition of DNA replication. The relationship between CPT-induced inhibition of DNA replication and CPT cytotoxicity remains unclear. We previously reported that the CPT-induced inhibition reflects an activated S-phase (S) checkpoint response and that this response is mainly regulated by ATR/CHK1 pathway. In this study, by comparing A1-5 and B4, the two transformed rat embryo fibroblasts cell lines, we showed that with higher CHK1 expression, A1-5 cells had a stronger S checkpoint response and were more resistant to CPT-treatment. The data suggested that over-activated CHK1 in CPT-treated A1-5 cells regulated the strong S checkpoint response through the CDC25A/CDK2 pathway. When the CHK-1 regulated strong S checkpoint response was abolished, A1-5 cells became much more sensitive to CPT-induced killing. These data indicated that CHK1 regulated S checkpoint response protected cells from CPT-induced killing.

Animals↗