PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

Yeon Hee Park

Publications and source records attributed to Yeon Hee Park.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Netupitant versus aprepitant: model-predicted neurokinin-1 receptor occupancy and implications for long-delayed nausea and vomiting prevention.

PURPOSE: Nausea and vomiting beyond 5&#xa0;days after emetogenic chemotherapy or antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) therapy are common, yet the role of neurokinin-1 (NK1) receptor antagonists in this setting remains underrecognized. We used pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modeling to estimate the NK1 receptor occupancy (RO), a proxy for clinical efficacy, for up to 20&#xa0;days after a single 300&#xa0;mg dose of oral netupitant, 3-day oral aprepitant (125&#xa0;mg on day 1; 80&#xa0;mg on days 2-3), or a single 165&#xa0;mg dose of oral aprepitant. METHODS: Data from previous PK studies were analyzed by compartmental modeling. Positron emission tomography studies assessing striatal NK1 RO were used to develop maximum drug effect PD models, which were fitted to NK1 RO data as a function of plasma concentrations. RESULTS: Model predicted NK1 RO exceeded 90% at 3&#xa0;h for all treatments. Thereafter, RO declined more gradually with netupitant (76%, 70%, 60%, and 21% on days 5, 7, 10, and 20, respectively) than with 3-day aprepitant (81%, 39%, 3%, and negligible) or single-dose aprepitant (45%, 10%, <&#x2009;1%, and negligible). The half-life of netupitant was ~&#x2009;6.1 times longer than aprepitant's. Netupitant plasma concentration remained above the effective concentration for 50% NK1 RO (EC50) through day 10, whereas aprepitant concentrations fell below the EC50 by ~&#x2009;days 7 and 5 after repeated and single dosing, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Single-dose netupitant maintained NK1 RO substantially longer than repeated- and single-dose aprepitant, suggesting greater potential for prolonged prevention of nausea and vomiting in ADC-treated patients. Prospective clinical validation of these model predictions would be beneficial.

Aprepitant

Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy followed by pembrolizumab in participants in Asia with early triple-negative breast cancer: An updated subgroup analysis of the KEYNOTE-522 randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: In KEYNOTE-522 (NCT03036488), addition of perioperative pembrolizumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved pathological complete response (pCR), event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS) in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). pCR and EFS results in participants enrolled in Asia were consistent with those in the overall population. We report OS, updated EFS, and safety outcomes in participants enrolled in Asia. METHODS: Participants with newly diagnosed, high-risk, early-stage TNBC (T1c [N1&#x2012;N2] or T2&#x2012;T4 [N0&#x2012;N2] per AJCC 7th edition) were randomized 2:1 to 8 cycles of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab 200&#x202f;mg Q3W or placebo plus chemotherapy. After definitive surgery, participants received adjuvant pembrolizumab 200&#x202f;mg Q3W or placebo for &#x2264;9 cycles. Primary endpoints were pCR (ypT0/Tis ypN0) and EFS. OS was a secondary endpoint. RESULTS: Of 1174 randomized participants, 216 were enrolled in Asia. At data cutoff (March 22, 2024), EFS events occurred in 18/136 participants (13.2%) in the pembrolizumab&#xa0;+&#xa0;chemotherapy group versus 22/80 (27.5%) in the placebo&#xa0;+&#xa0;chemotherapy group (HR, 0.43 [95% CI, 0.23&#x2012;0.81]); 60-month EFS rates (95% CIs) were 87.4% (80.6%&#x2012;92.0%) and 72.1% (60.7%&#x2012;80.6%), respectively. In the respective groups, 12/136 (8.8%) and 16/80 participants (20.0%) died (HR, 0.41 [95% CI, 0.19&#x2012;0.86]); 60-month OS rates (95% CIs) were 91.9% (85.8%&#x2012;95.4%) and 81.1% (70.5%&#x2012;88.1%). Treatment-related AEs led to treatment discontinuation in 19/136 participants (14.0%) with pembrolizumab&#xa0;+&#xa0;chemotherapy and 7/79 (8.9%) with placebo&#xa0;+&#xa0;chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: OS and updated EFS outcomes in KEYNOTE-522 participants enrolled in Asia were consistent with those in the overall population and support use of perioperative pembrolizumab&#xa0;+&#xa0;neoadjuvant chemotherapy as a standard-of-care treatment in this setting.

Adjuvant