PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Yigal Avivi

Publications and source records attributed to Yigal Avivi.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Different domains control the localization and mobility of LIKE HETEROCHROMATIN PROTEIN1 in Arabidopsis nuclei.

Plants possess a single gene for the structurally related HETEROCHROMATIN PROTEIN1 (HP1), termed LIKE-HP1 (LHP1). We investigated the subnuclear localization, binding properties, and dynamics of LHP1 proteins in Arabidopsis thaliana cells. Transient expression assays showed that tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) LHP1 fused to green fluorescent protein (GFP; Sl LHP1-GFP) and Arabidopsis LHP1 (At LHP1-GFP) localized to heterochromatic chromocenters and showed punctuated distribution within the nucleus; tomato but not Arabidopsis LHP1 was also localized within the nucleolus. Mutations of aromatic cage residues that recognize methyl K9 of histone H3 abolished their punctuated distribution and localization to chromocenters. Sl LHP1-GFP plants displayed cell type-dependent subnuclear localization. The diverse localization pattern of tomato LHP1 did not require the chromo shadow domain (CSD), whereas the chromodomain alone was insufficient for localization to chromocenters; a nucleolar localization signal was identified within the hinge region. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching showed that Sl LHP1 is a highly mobile protein whose localization and retention are controlled by distinct domains; retention at the nucleolus and chromocenters is conferred by the CSD. Our results imply that LHP1 recruitment to chromatin is mediated, at least in part, through interaction with methyl K9 and that LHP1 controls different nuclear processes via transient binding to its nuclear sites.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

DDM1 binds Arabidopsis methyl-CpG binding domain proteins and affects their subnuclear localization.

Methyl-CpG binding domain (MBD) proteins in Arabidopsis thaliana bind in vitro methylated CpG sites. Here, we aimed to characterize the binding properties of AtMBDs to chromatin in Arabidopsis nuclei. By expressing in wild-type cells AtMBDs fused to green fluorescent protein (GFP), we showed that AtMBD7 was evenly distributed at all chromocenters, whereas AtMBD5 and 6 showed preference for two perinucleolar chromocenters adjacent to nucleolar organizing regions. AtMBD2, previously shown to be incapable of binding in vitro-methylated CpG, was dispersed within the nucleus, excluding chromocenters and the nucleolus. Recruitment of AtMBD5, 6, and 7 to chromocenters was disrupted in ddm1 and met1 mutant cells, where a significant reduction in cytosine methylation occurs. In these mutant cells, however, AtMBD2 accumulated at chromocenters. No effect on localization was observed in the chromomethylase3 mutant showing reduced CpNpG methylation or in kyp-2 displaying a reduction in Lys 9 histone H3 methylation. Transient expression of DDM1 fused to GFP showed that DDM1 shares common sites with AtMBD proteins. Glutathione S-transferase pull-down assays demonstrated that AtMBDs bind DDM1; the MBD motif was sufficient for this interaction. Our results suggest that the subnuclear localization of AtMBD is not solely dependent on CpG methylation; DDM1 may facilitate localization of AtMBDs at specific nuclear domains.

Arabidopsis↗

Reorganization of specific chromosomal domains and activation of silent genes in plant cells acquiring pluripotentiality.

The transition from leaf cells to protoplasts (plant cells devoid of cell walls) confers pluripotentiality coupled with chromatin reorganization. Here, we sought to identify remodeled chromosomal domains in Arabidopsis protoplasts by tracking DNA sequences undergoing changes in DNA methylation and by identifying up-regulated genes. We observed a reduction in DNA methylation at a pericentromeric region of chromosome 1, and up-regulation of several members of the NAC (NAM/ATAF1/CUC2) domain family, two of which are located near the telomeric region of chromosome 1. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis demonstrated that both pericentromeric and telomeric subdomains underwent chromatin decondensation. This decondensation is subdomain-specific inasmuch as centromeric repeats remained largely unchanged, whereas the 18S rDNA underwent condensation. Within the pericentromeric subdomain, VIP1, a gene encoding a b-Zip nuclear protein required for Agrobacterium infectivity, was transcriptionally activated. Overexpression of this gene in tobacco resulted in growth retardation and inhibition of differentiation and shoot formation. Altogether, our data indicate that acquisition of pluripotentiality involves changes in DNA methylation pattern and reorganization of specific chromosomal subdomains. This change leads to activation of silent genes whose products are involved in acquisition or maintenance of pluripotentiality and/or the ensuing fate of the cell.

Blotting, Northern↗

Chromatin reorganization accompanying cellular dedifferentiation is associated with modifications of histone H3, redistribution of HP1, and activation of E2F-target genes.

The remarkable regeneration capacity of plant cells is based on their capability to dedifferentiate. We recently reported that cellular dedifferentiation proceeds through two distinct phases, each accompanied by chromatin decondensation: acquisition of competence for fate switch followed by a signal-dependent reentry into S phase. The purpose of this study was to (1) characterize changes in chromatin factors associated with chromatin decondensation, and (2) study the relationship between chromatin decondensation and transcriptional activation of pRb/E2F-regulated genes. We show that plant cells competent for fate switch display a disruption of nucleolar domain appearance associated with condensation of 18S ribosomal DNA, as well as modifications of histone H3 and redistribution of heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1). We further show that the pRb/E2F-target genes RNR2 and PCNA are condensed and silent in differentiated leaf cells but become decondensed, although not yet activated, as cells acquire competence for fate switch; transcriptional activation becomes evident during progression into S phase, concomitantly with pRb phosphorylation. We propose that chromatin reorganization is central for reversion of the differentiation process leading to resetting of the gene expression program and activation of silent genes.

Cell Cycle Proteins↗

Phosphorylation of histone h3 at serine 10 cannot account directly for the detachment of human heterochromatin protein 1gamma from mitotic chromosomes in plant cells.

Heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1) controls heterochromatin formation in animal cells, at least partly through interaction with lysine 9 (Lys-9)-methylated histone H3. We aimed to determine whether a structurally conserved human HP1 protein exhibits conserved heterochromatin localization in plant cells and studied its relation to modified histone H3. We generated transgenic tobacco plants and cycling cells expressing the human HP1gamma fused to green fluorescent protein (GFP) and followed its association with chromatin. Plants expressing GFP-HP1gamma showed no phenotypic perturbations. We found that GFP-HP1gamma is preferentially associated with the transcriptionally "inactive" heterochromatin fraction, a fraction enriched in Lys-9-methylated histone H3. During mitosis GFP-HP1gamma is detached from chromosomes concomitantly with phosphorylation of histone H3 at serine 10 and reassembles as cells exit mitosis. However, this phosphorylation cannot directly account for the dissociation of GFP-HP1gamma from mitotic chromosomes inasmuch as phosphorylation does not interfere with binding to HP1gamma. It is, therefore, possible that phosphorylation at serine 10 creates a "code" that is read by as yet an unknown factor(s), eventually leading to detachment of GFP-HP1gamma from mitotic chromosomes. Together, our results suggest that chromatin organization in plants and animals is conserved, being controlled at least partly by the association of HP1 proteins with methylated histone H3.

Cell Nucleus↗