PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Yiyong Liu

Publications and source records attributed to Yiyong Liu.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

Metabolome analyses of mouse uteri two to four days post coitum.

To elucidate the temporal and dynamic changes in uterine metabolites in mice, uterine samples were collected on Day 2 (D2; n = 8), Day 3 (D3; n = 6), and Day 4 (D4; n = 7) postcoitum and subjected to an untargeted metabolomic analysis. The results revealed significant metabolic alterations across the time points. Compared to D2, D3 showed 124 differentially expressed metabolites (95 upregulated and 29 downregulated), whereas D4 exhibited 377 (262 upregulated and 115 downregulated). Between D4 and D3, 370 metabolites were altered (242 upregulated and 128 downregulated). K-means clustering identified five metabolite clusters, with Clusters 3 and 5 displaying the most pronounced temporal variations. Metabolites in cluster 3 remained stable from D2 to D3 but sharply increased by D4, whereas those in cluster 5 were stable from D2 to D3 and markedly decreased by D4. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis indicated that metabolites in Cluster 3 were primarily enriched in the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, arachidonic acid metabolism, and cholesterol and linoleic acid metabolism pathways. Cluster 5 metabolites were primarily enriched in pathways related to unsaturated fatty acids (linoleic acid, arachidonic acid, and α-linolenic acid) and amino acid metabolism (vitamin B6, taurine, and hypotaurine). Cluster 3 mainly comprised prostaglandins and related compounds, whereas Cluster 5 consisted largely of long-chain fatty acids. Notably, most lipid and lipid-like metabolites in these clusters were associated with embryonic development. These findings elucidate the dynamic metabolic changes in the uterus during the preimplantation stage and highlight the critical roles of amino acids, unsaturated fatty acids, prostaglandins, and lipid-related metabolites in modulating the uterine environment to support embryo implantation and early development.

Animals↗

Specific and efficient binding of xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group A to double-strand/single-strand DNA junctions with 3'- and/or 5'-ssDNA branches.

Human XPA is an important DNA damage recognition protein in nucleotide excision repair (NER). We previously observed that XPA binds to the DNA lesion as a homodimer [Liu, Y., Liu, Y., Yang, Z., Utzat, C., Wang, G., Basu, A. K., and Zou, Y. (2005) Biochemistry 44, 7361-7368]. Herein we report that XPA recognized undamaged DNA double-strand/single-strand (ds-ssDNA) junctions containing ssDNA branches with binding affinity (Kd = 49.1 +/- 5.1 nM) much higher than its ability to bind to DNA damage. The recognized DNA junction structures include the Y-shape junction (with both 3'- and 5'-ssDNA branches), 3'-overhang junction (with a 3'-ssDNA branch), and 5'-overhang junction (with a 5'-ssDNA branch). Using gel filtration chromatography and gel mobility shift assays, we showed that the highly efficient binding appeared to be carried out by the XPA monomer and that the binding was largely independent of RPA. Furthermore, XPA efficiently bound to six-nucleotide mismatched DNA bubble substrates with or without DNA adducts including C8 guanine adducts of AF, AAF, and AP and the T[6,4]T photoproducts. Using a set of defined DNA substrates with varying degrees of DNA bending, we also found that the XPC-HR23B complex recognized DNA bending, whereas neither XPA nor the XPA-RPA complex could bind to bent DNA. We propose that, besides DNA damage recognition, XPA may also play a novel role in stabilizing, via its high affinity to ds-ssDNA junctions, the DNA strand opening surrounding the lesion for stable formation of preincision NER intermediates. Our results provide a plausible mechanistic interpretation for the indispensable requirement of XPA for both global genome and transcription-coupled repairs. Since ds-ssDNA junctions are common intermediates in many DNA metabolic pathways, the additional potential role of XPA in cellular processes is discussed.

Animals↗

DNA damage responses in progeroid syndromes arise from defective maturation of prelamin A.

The genetic diseases Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome (HGPS) and restrictive dermopathy (RD) arise from accumulation of farnesylated prelamin A because of defects in the lamin A maturation pathway. Both of these diseases exhibit symptoms that can be viewed as accelerated aging. The mechanism by which accumulation of farnesylated prelamin A leads to these accelerated aging phenotypes is not understood. Here we present evidence that in HGPS and RD fibroblasts, DNA damage checkpoints are persistently activated because of the compromise in genomic integrity. Inactivation of checkpoint kinases Ataxia-telangiectasia-mutated (ATM) and ATR (ATM- and Rad3-related) in these patient cells can partially overcome their early replication arrest. Treatment of patient cells with a protein farnesyltransferase inhibitor (FTI) did not result in reduction of DNA double-strand breaks and damage checkpoint signaling, although the treatment significantly reversed the aberrant shape of their nuclei. This suggests that DNA damage accumulation and aberrant nuclear morphology are independent phenotypes arising from prelamin A accumulation in these progeroid syndromes. Since DNA damage accumulation is an important contributor to the symptoms of HGPS, our results call into question the possibility of treatment of HGPS with FTIs alone.

Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated Proteins↗

Functions of human replication protein A (RPA): from DNA replication to DNA damage and stress responses.

Human replication protein A (RPA), a heterotrimeric protein complex, was originally defined as a eukaryotic single-stranded DNA binding (SSB) protein essential for the in vitro replication of simian virus 40 (SV40) DNA. Since then RPA has been found to be an indispensable player in almost all DNA metabolic pathways such as, but not limited to, DNA replication, DNA repair, recombination, cell cycle, and DNA damage checkpoints. Defects in these cellular reactions may lead to genome instability and, thus, the diseases with a high potential to evolve into cancer. This extensive involvement of RPA in various cellular activities implies a potential modulatory role for RPA in cellular responses to genotoxic insults. In support, RPA is hyperphosphorylated upon DNA damage or replication stress by checkpoint kinases including ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM), ATR (ATM and Rad3-related), and DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK). The hyperphosphorylation may change the functions of RPA and, thus, the activities of individual pathways in which it is involved. Indeed, there is growing evidence that hyperphosphorylation alters RPA-DNA and RPA-protein interactions. In addition, recent advances in understanding the molecular basis of the stress-induced modulation of RPA functions demonstrate that RPA undergoes a subtle structural change upon hyperphosphorylation, revealing a structure-based modulatory mechanism. Furthermore, given the crucial roles of RPA in a broad range of cellular processes, targeting RPA to inhibit its specific functions, particularly in DNA replication and repair, may serve a valuable strategy for drug development towards better cancer treatment.

Cell Cycle Proteins↗

Preferential localization of hyperphosphorylated replication protein A to double-strand break repair and checkpoint complexes upon DNA damage.

RPA (replication protein A) is an essential factor for DNA DSB (double-strand break) repair and cell cycle checkpoint activation. The 32 kDa subunit of RPA undergoes hyperphosphorylation in response to cellular genotoxic insults. However, the potential involvement of hyperphosphorylated RPA in DSB repair and checkpoint activation remains unclear. Using co-immunoprecipitation assays, we showed that cellular interaction of RPA with two DSB repair factors, Rad51 and Rad52, was predominantly mediated by the hyperphosphorylated species of RPA in cells after UV and camptothecin treatment. Moreover, Rad51 and Rad52 displayed higher affinity for the hyperphosphorylated RPA than native RPA in an in vitro binding assay. Checkpoint kinase ATR (ataxia telangiectasia mutated and Rad3-related) also interacted more efficiently with the hyperphosphorylated RPA than with native RPA following DNA damage. Consistently, immunofluorescence microscopy demonstrated that the hyperphosphorylated RPA was able to co-localize with Rad52 and ATR to form significant nuclear foci in cells. Our results suggest that hyperphosphorylated RPA is preferentially localized to DSB repair and the DNA damage checkpoint complexes in response to DNA damage.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Modulation of replication protein A function by its hyperphosphorylation-induced conformational change involving DNA binding domain B.

Human replication protein A (RPA), composed of RPA70, RPA32, and RPA14 subunits, undergoes hyperphosphorylation in cells in response to DNA damage. Hyperphosphorylation that occurs predominately in the N-terminal region of RPA32 is believed to play a role in modulating the cellular activities of RPA essential for almost all DNA metabolic pathways. To understand how the hyperphosphorylation modulates the functions of RPA, we compared the structural characteristics of full-length native and hyperphosphorylated RPAs using mass spectrometric protein footprinting, fluorescence spectroscopy, and limited proteolysis. Our mass spectrometric data showed that of 24 lysines and 18 arginines readily susceptible to small chemical reagent modification in native RPA, the three residues Lys-343, Arg-335, and Arg-382, located in DNA binding domain B (DBD-B) of RPA70, were significantly shielded in the hyperphosphorylated protein. Tryptophan fluorescence studies indicated significant quenching of Trp-361, located in the DBD-B domain, induced by hyperphosphorylation of RPA. Consistently, DBD-B became more resistant to the limited proteolysis by chymotrypsin after RPA hyperphosphorylation. Taken together, our results indicate that upon hyperphosphorylation of RPA32 N terminus (RPA32N), RPA undergoes a conformational change involving the single-stranded DNA binding cleft of DBD-B. Comparison of the interactions of native and hyperphosphorylated RPAs with short single-stranded oligonucleotides or partial DNA duplexes with a short 5' or 3' single-stranded DNA tails showed reduced affinity for the latter protein. We propose that the hyperphosphorylation may play a role in modulating the cellular pathways by altering the DBD-B-mediated RPA-DNA and RPA-protein interactions, hypothetically via the interaction of hyperphosphorylated RPA32N with DBD-B.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Cooperative interaction of human XPA stabilizes and enhances specific binding of XPA to DNA damage.

Human xeroderma pigmentosum group A (XPA) is an essential protein for nucleotide excision repair (NER). We have previously reported that XPA forms a homodimer in the absence of DNA. However, what oligomeric forms of XPA are involved in DNA damage recognition and how the interaction occurs in terms of biochemical understanding remain unclear. Using the homogeneous XPA protein purified from baculovirus-infected Sf21 insect cells and the methods of gel mobility shift assays, gel filtration chromatography, and UV-cross-linking, we demonstrated that both monomeric and dimeric XPA bound to the DNA adduct of N-acetyl-2-aminofluorene (AAF), while showing little affinity for nondamaged DNA. The binding occurred in a sequential and protein concentration-dependent manner. At relatively low-protein concentrations, XPA formed a complex with DNA adduct as a monomer, while at the higher concentrations, an XPA dimer was involved in the specific binding. Results from fluorescence spectroscopic and competitive binding analyses indicated that the specific binding of XPA to the adduct was significantly facilitated and stabilized by the presence of the second XPA in a positive cooperative manner. This cooperative binding exhibited a Hill coefficient of 1.9 and the step binding constants of K(1) = 1.4 x 10(6) M(-)(1) and K(2) = 1.8 x 10(7) M(-)(1). When interaction of XPA and RPA with DNA was studied, even though binding of RPA-XPA complex to adducted DNA was observed, the presence of RPA had little effect on the overall binding efficiency. Our results suggest that the dominant form for XPA to efficiently bind to DNA damage is the XPA dimer. We hypothesized that the concentration-dependent formation of different types of XPA-damaged DNA complex may play a role in cellular regulation of XPA activity.

2-Acetylaminofluorene↗

Interactions of human replication protein A with single-stranded DNA adducts.

Human RPA (replication protein A), a single-stranded DNA-binding protein, is required for many cellular pathways including DNA repair, recombination and replication. However, the role of RPA in nucleotide excision repair remains elusive. In the present study, we have systematically examined the binding of RPA to a battery of well-defined ssDNA (single-stranded DNA) substrates using fluorescence spectroscopy. These substrates contain adducts of (6-4) photoproducts, N-acetyl-2-aminofluorene-, 1-aminopyrene-, BPDE (benzo[a]pyrene diol epoxide)- and fluorescein that are different in many aspects such as molecular structure and size, DNA disruption mode (e.g. base stacking or non-stacking), as well as chemical properties. Our results showed that RPA has a lower binding affinity for damaged ssDNA than for non-damaged ssDNA and that the affinity of RPA for damaged ssDNA depends on the type of adduct. Interestingly, the bulkier lesions have a greater effect. With a fluorescent base-stacking bulky adduct, (+)-cis-anti-BPDE-dG, we demonstrated that, on binding of RPA, the fluorescence of BPDE-ssDNA was significantly enhanced by up to 8-9-fold. This indicated that the stacking between the BPDE adduct and its neighbouring ssDNA bases had been disrupted and there was a lack of substantial direct contacts between the protein residues and the lesion itself. For RPA interaction with short damaged ssDNA, we propose that, on RPA binding, the modified base of ssDNA is looped out from the surface of the protein, permitting proper contacts of RPA with the remaining unmodified bases.

DNA Adducts↗