PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Yoshiaki Mikami

Publications and source records attributed to Yoshiaki Mikami.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Classification of chemical compounds by protein-compound docking for use in designing a focused library.

We developed a new method for the classification of chemical compounds and protein pockets and applied it to a random screening experiment for macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF). The principal component analysis (PCA) method was applied to the protein-compound interaction matrix, which was given by thorough docking calculations between a set of many protein pockets and chemical compounds. Each compound and protein pocket was depicted as a point in the PCA spaces of compounds and proteins, respectively. This method was applied to distinguish active compounds from negative compounds of MIF. A random screening experiment for MIF was performed, and our method revealed that the active compounds were localized in the PCA space of compounds, while the negative compounds showed a wide distribution. Furthermore, protein pockets, which bind similar compounds, were classified and were found to form a cluster in the PCA space.

Binding Sites↗

Multiple target screening method for robust and accurate in silico ligand screening.

We developed a new in silico multiple target screening (MTS) method, based on a multi-receptor versus multi-ligand docking affinity matrixes, and examined its robustness against changes in the scoring system. According to this method, compounds in a database are docked to multiple proteins. The compounds among these proteins that are likely bind to the target protein are selected as the members of the candidate-hit compound group. Then, the compounds in the group are sorted into descending order using the docking score: the first (n-th) compound is expected to be the most (n-th) probable hit compound. This method was applied to the analysis of a set of 142 receptors and 142 compounds using a receptor-ligand docking program, Sievgene [Y. Fukunishi, Y. Mikami, H. Nakamura, Similarities among receptor pockets and among compounds: analysis and application to in silico ligand screening, J. Mol. Graphics Modelling, 24 (2005) 34-45], and the results demonstrated that this method achieves a high hit ratio compared to uniform sampling. We prepared two new scores: the DeltaG score, designed to reproduce the protein-ligand binding free energy, and the hit-optimized score, designed to maximize the hit ratio of in silico screening. Using the Sievgene docking score, DeltaG score and hit-optimized score, the MTS method is more robust than the multiple active-site correction scoring method [G.P.A. Vigers, J.P. Rizzi, Multiple active site corrections for docking and virtual screening, J. Med. Chem., 47 (2004) 80-89].

Databases, Factual↗

Similarities among receptor pockets and among compounds: analysis and application to in silico ligand screening.

We developed a new method to evaluate the distances and similarities between receptor pockets or chemical compounds based on a multi-receptor versus multi-ligand docking affinity matrix. The receptors were classified by a cluster analysis based on calculations of the distance between receptor pockets. A set of low homologous receptors that bind a similar compound could be classified into one cluster. Based on this line of reasoning, we proposed a new in silico screening method. According to this method, compounds in a database were docked to multiple targets. The new docking score was a slightly modified version of the multiple active site correction (MASC) score. Receptors that were at a set distance from the target receptor were not included in the analysis, and the modified MASC scores were calculated for the selected receptors. The choice of the receptors is important to achieve a good screening result, and our clustering of receptors is useful to this purpose. This method was applied to the analysis of a set of 132 receptors and 132 compounds, and the results demonstrated that this method achieves a high hit ratio, as compared to that of a uniform sampling, using a receptor-ligand docking program, Sievgene, which was newly developed with a good docking performance yielding 50.8% of the reconstructed complexes at a distance of less than 2 A RMSD.

Bacterial Proteins↗