PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

Yu Xiang

Publications and source records attributed to Yu Xiang.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Effects of intensive blood pressure control on cardio-kidney outcomes by KDIGO risk categories: a Post Hoc analysis of ACCORD-BP and SPRINT trials.

The effects of intensive systolic blood pressure (SBP) control on cardiovascular (CV) and kidney outcomes across different Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) risk categories remain unclear. We performed a secondary analysis of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) and the SPRINT-eligible Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes Blood Pressure (ACCORD-BP) trial. Participants were categorized into low, moderate, and high/very-high KDIGO risk groups. The primary outcomes were composite adverse CV events (defined as nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), nonfatal stroke, fatal or hospitalized heart failure (HF), and CV mortality) and composite adverse kidney events (defined as a sustained decline in eGFR of &#x2265;&#xa0;40% and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD)). We found that intensive BP control reduced the risk of composite CV events (HR 0.68; 95% CI 0.59-0.78), with attenuated benefits in higher KDIGO risk categories (P for interaction = 0.055). This interaction was mainly driven by nonfatal MI and fatal or hospitalized HF (both P for interaction < 0.05). Intensive BP control increased the risk of composite kidney events (HR 1.88; 95% CI 1.52-2.33), mainly in low- and moderate-risk groups rather than in high/very-high risk groups (P for interaction = 0.04). Similar patterns were observed for sustained eGFR decline (P for interaction = 0.03), but not for ESKD (HR 1.05; 95% CI 0.74-1.48; P for interaction = 0.71). The KDIGO risk classification modified the effects of intensive BP control. Balancing CV benefits against potential kidney impacts in patients with different KDIGO risks during intensive BP treatment is recommended. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT01206062 (SPRINT) and NCT00000620 (ACCORD).

Cardiovascular outcome

BRCA1 safeguards genome integrity by activating chromosome asynapsis checkpoint to eliminate recombination-defective oocytes.

In the meiotic prophase, programmed DNA double-strand breaks are repaired by meiotic recombination. Recombination-defective meiocytes are eliminated to preserve genome integrity in gametes. BRCA1 is a critical protein in somatic homologous recombination, but studies have suggested that BRCA1 is dispensable for meiotic recombination. Here we show that BRCA1 is essential for meiotic recombination. Interestingly, BRCA1 also has a function in eliminating recombination-defective oocytes. Brca1 knockout (KO) rescues the survival of Dmc1 KO oocytes far more efficiently than removing CHK2, a vital component of the DNA damage checkpoint in oocytes. Mechanistically, BRCA1 activates chromosome asynapsis checkpoint by promoting ATR activity at unsynapsed chromosome axes in Dmc1 KO oocytes. Moreover, Brca1 KO also rescues the survival of asynaptic Spo11 KO oocytes. Collectively, our study not only unveils an unappreciated role of chromosome asynapsis in eliminating recombination-defective oocytes but also reveals the dual functions of BRCA1 in safeguarding oocyte genome integrity.

Oocytes