PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

Yue Wei

Publications and source records attributed to Yue Wei.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

The Novel Hypomethylating Agent NTX-301 Reprograms Epigenetic and Hippo Signaling Pathways and Exhibits Preclinical Activity in Venetoclax-Resistant and TP53-Mutant AML.

PURPOSE: Hypomethylating agent (HMA) and the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax (VEN) combinations have evolved into first-line therapies for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), yielding high response rates. However, most patients ultimately relapse, particularly those with TP53 mutations. We investigated mechanisms of action and therapeutic efficacy of NTX-301, a next-generation HMA. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Methods used include flow cytometry-based cell viability assays, Western blotting, reverse-phase protein arrays, RNA sequencing, Cytometry by Time-Of-Flight single-cell mass cytometry, and methylation profiling in various therapy-resistant AML models. RESULTS: We demonstrate that NTX-301 exhibits superior efficacy compared with 5-azacytidine (5-AZA) in 5-AZA- or VEN-resistant AML. It synergizes with VEN in VEN- or VEN/HMA-resistant and TP53-mutant AML blasts and stem/progenitor cells (combination index <1). NTX-301 inhibits DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1) and increases p73 and caspase 8 (CASP8)/activated CASP8 levels in TP53 wild-type and TP53-mutant AML and activates p53 signaling. It extends survival (&#x2265;45%) in both xenograft and patient-derived xenograft models. Methylation profiling revealed that NTX-301 is a more targeted HMA compared with 5-AZA, enabling suppression of functionally enriched genes/pathways. Pathway analysis of 954 commonly hypomethylated genes showed profoundly greater enrichment of Hippo signaling in NTX-301-treated compared with 5-AZA-treated cells and enrichment of insulin signaling, VEGF pathway, and cell cycle selectively in NTX-301- but not in 5-AZA-treated cells. NTX-301-mediated Hippo signaling was validated at protein levels. CONCLUSIONS: Data suggest that NTX-301 exerts potent antileukemic activities superior to 5-AZA and synergizes with VEN in VEN-resistant and TP53-mutant AML, in part by suppressing DNMT1, inducing DNA damage responses and apoptosis through p53 signaling, and demethylating LATS1/2, thereby activating Hippo signaling.

Humans

Safety and Effectiveness of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin for Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Cancer-associated thrombosis is a condition associated with high mortality rates, yet limited evidence exists regarding the safety and effectiveness of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), focusing on a fixed follow-up period based on clinical practice guideline recommendations. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the safety and effectiveness of DOACs versus LMWH in patients with cancer-associated thrombosis over a 6-month follow-up period. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched up to 30 June, 2025. Recurrent venous thromboembolism, major bleeding, and all-cause mortality were pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: Seven randomized controlled trials and 28 cohort studies were included in our systematic review. After applying the criteria for a 6-month follow-up period, five randomized controlled trials and 16 cohort studies with 49,824 patients were analyzed in the meta-analysis. In randomized controlled trials, DOACs showed a lower incidence of venous thromboembolism recurrence (relative risk [RR] 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49-0.87) compared with LMWH, with a non-significant increase in major bleeding (RR 1.28, 95% CI 0.87-1.88) and no significant difference in all-cause mortality (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.86-1.18). Cohort studies demonstrated a lower incidence of venous thromboembolism recurrence (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.62-0.76) with DOACs, a non-significant reduction in major bleeding (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.68-1.07), and a lower risk of all-cause mortality (RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.31-0.72). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with cancer-associated thrombosis, DOACs demonstrated a decrease in recurrent venous thromboembolism without increasing the risk of all-cause mortality. A non-significant increase in the risk of major bleeding was recorded in randomized controlled trials, but not in cohort studies. DOACs may provide greater effectiveness for cancer-associated thrombosis compared with LMWH.

Humans