PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Yunhua Zhu

Publications and source records attributed to Yunhua Zhu.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone activation of c-jun, but not early growth response factor-1, stimulates transcription of a luteinizing hormone beta-subunit gene.

Transcription of mammalian LH beta-subunit genes (LHbeta) is regulated by GnRH through activation of early growth response factor-1 (Egr-1), which interacts synergistically with steroidogenic factor-1 (Sf-1) and pituitary homeobox-1 (Pitx1) at the promoter; Egr-1 is thought to comprise the major mediator of this effect. However, the proximal promoters of LHbeta genes in lower vertebrates lack an Egr-1 response element yet are responsive to GnRH; we demonstrate here that the promoter of the Chinook salmon LHbeta (csLHbeta) gene is also unresponsive to Egr-1. The homologous LHbeta promoters in other fish contain a conserved estrogen response element-like sequence, which we recently demonstrated is not required for estrogen receptor (ER) alpha association with the csLHbeta gene. Here we show that the estrogen response element-like element is required for the GnRH effect and for a response to c-jun overexpression. Using plasmid immunoprecipitation, we show that after GnRH exposure, c-jun associates with the intact csLHbeta gene promoter through this element. We further show that the effect of c-jun requires its DNA-binding domain and that c-jun interacts with Sf-1 and ERalpha and exerts synergistic effects on promoter activity with Sf-1, ERalpha, and Pitx1. Finally, we demonstrate the role of c-jun in mediating the GnRH effect on this gene through knockdown of c-jun expression or use of a dominant negative. We conclude that c-jun mediation of the GnRH effect on the LHbeta gene may be common in lower vertebrates and may have preceded an evolutionary divergence in the cis-regulatory elements that led to its function being replaced in mammals by Egr-1.

Animals↗

Improved system integration for integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) systems.

Integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) systems are a promising technology for power generation. They include an air separation unit (ASU), a gasification system, and a gas turbine combined cycle power block, and feature competitive efficiency and lower emissions compared to conventional power generation technology. IGCC systems are not yet in widespread commercial use and opportunities remain to improve system feasibility via improved process integration. A process simulation model was developed for IGCC systems with alternative types of ASU and gas turbine integration. The model is applied to evaluate integration schemes involving nitrogen injection, air extraction, and combinations of both, as well as different ASU pressure levels. The optimal nitrogen injection only case in combination with an elevated pressure ASU had the highest efficiency and power output and approximately the lowest emissions per unit output of all cases considered, and thus is a recommended design option. The optimal combination of air extraction coupled with nitrogen injection had slightly worse efficiency, power output, and emissions than the optimal nitrogen injection only case. Air extraction alone typically produced lower efficiency, lower power output, and higher emissions than all other cases. The recommended nitrogen injection only case is estimated to provide annualized cost savings compared to a nonintegrated design. Process simulation modeling is shown to be a useful tool for evaluation and screening of technology options.

Gases↗

Uncertainty analysis of integrated gasification combined cycle systems based on Frame 7H versus 7F gas turbines.

Integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) technology is a promising alternative for clean generation of power and coproduction of chemicals from coal and other feedstocks. Advanced concepts for IGCC systems that incorporate state-of-the-art gas turbine systems, however, are not commercially demonstrated. Therefore, there is uncertainty regarding the future commercial-scale performance, emissions, and cost of such technologies. The Frame 7F gas turbine represents current state-of-practice, whereas the Frame 7H is the most recently introduced advanced commercial gas turbine. The objective of this study was to evaluate the risks and potential payoffs of IGCC technology based on different gas turbine combined cycle designs. Models of entrained-flow gasifier-based IGCC systems with Frame 7F (IGCC-7F) and 7H gas turbine combined cycles (IGCC-7H) were developed in ASPEN Plus. An uncertainty analysis was conducted. Gasifier carbon conversion and project cost uncertainty are identified as the most important uncertain inputs with respect to system performance and cost. The uncertainties in the difference of the efficiencies and costs for the two systems are characterized. Despite uncertainty, the IGCC-7H system is robustly preferred to the IGCC-7F system. Advances in gas turbine design will improve the performance, emissions, and cost of IGCC systems. The implications of this study for decision-making regarding technology selection, research planning, and plant operation are discussed.

Coal↗