Biomedical subjects

Yvonne Berglund

Publications and source records attributed to Yvonne Berglund.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Video-assisted gastrostomy in infants less than 1 year.

The objectives of this study were to report our experience with the laparoscopic video-assisted gastrostomy technique in infants operated during their first year of life. A total of 53 infants (35 males, 18 females) aged 6 +/- 3 months, varying from 3 weeks to 11 months, underwent video-assisted gastrostomy. They were prospectively followed up. Included are infants with neurological dysfunction, chromosomal anomalies, metabolic disorders, cardiac anomalies or respiratory insufficiency. All the infants were operated under general and local anaesthesia. Gastrostomy tube feeding began within 4 h after the operation. The infants were followed with a scheduled control at 1 and 6 months postoperatively documenting complications and weight gain. The main outcome measure was the number and type of complications as well as weight gain using the age-adjusted Z-score of weight to normalize the data relative to a reference population. The weight before and 6 months after the video-assisted gastrostomy was 5.5 +/- 1.6 and 8.5 +/- 1.6 kg, respectively. The Z-score increased significantly (P < 0.001) from -2.7+/-1.5 to -1.7 +/- 1.0. This illustrates the postoperative weight gain and catch-up. Short and long-term complications included minor local wound infection, leakage around the gastrostomy tube and granuloma, but no severe complications. Our results encourage the use of video-assisted gastrostomy as a safe technique to provide a route for long-term nutritional support even in infants less than 1 year.

Female↗

PubMed2006

Complications of video-assisted gastrostomy in children with malignancies or neurological diseases.

AIM: To test the hypothesis whether the administration of cytostatic drugs close to surgery in children with malignancies influences the rate of postoperative complications. METHOD: Included in the study were 27 children with malignancies and a control group of 27 neurologically impaired children. All the children had nutritional problems and underwent a video-assisted gastrostomy (VAG) operation during the period 1997-2002. The children were postoperatively followed up. All complications were documented according to a protocol by a specially trained nurse and correlated to the time elapsed from completion of the last preoperative or the first postoperative cytostatic drug treatment. The complications in the two groups were compared. RESULTS: The children with malignant diseases did not have more postoperative complications of the VAG than those having neurological defects. There was no correlation to complications regarding timing of the operation and administration of cytostatic drugs. CONCLUSION: This study revealed no aggravated influence of cytostatic drug treatment on early postoperative problems of VAG. The timing of cytostatic drug administration in relation to the surgical intervention did not influence the frequency of postoperative complications.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2005

Closure after gastrostomy button.

A gastrostomy device is removed from the gastrostoma when no longer needed. The aim of the study was to test the hypothesis of whether it is possible for the surgeon to decide which stoma has to be closed with a gastroraphy and which to leave for a spontaneous closure within a reasonable period of time. Out of a cohort of 321 patients, who had been operated with a video-assisted gastrostomy, we included all the 48 patients having had their gastrostomy button removed. These patients were carefully followed and the closure of the gastrostoma was registered. According to the institutional routine we waited at least 3 months after the removal of the gastrostomy device before suggesting to the child's guardians an operative closure of the stoma. In 26 patients the stoma closed within 3 months, whereas in 22 patients a surgical gastroraphy was performed. We found no differences between the two groups regarding the patients' diagnoses, the duration of the gastrostoma use or patient's age at the time of removal of the gastrostomy device. This study rejected the hypothesis of predictability of the gastrostoma closure. Thus, we recommend a routine expectance after the removal of a gastrostomy device for at least 1 month. If no spontaneous closure occurs, then a gastroraphy should be performed.

Abdominal Wall↗