A rare cause of epididymo-orchitis.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Z Ahsan.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
It is known that disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) can contribute towards blood loss after transurethral resection of the prostate because of the absorption of various prostatic substances. The aim of the present study was to establish whether simple coagulation tests (prothrombin time/activated partial thromboplastin time) carried out immediately after surgery would be useful in predicting those patients who bleed excessively after prostatic resection due to DIC. Criteria to determine significant post-operative haemorrhage were defined. Of 110 patients entered into the study, 34.5% had significant post-operative bleeding and 74% of these had an abnormal prothrombin time (> or = 15 s) immediately after surgery. An abnormal prothrombin time was associated with the resection of large prostates but could also predict the risk of bleeding independent of the resected weight; 18% of patients with an abnormal prothrombin time were also found to have an abnormal activated partial thromboplastin time and all of these had significant blood loss. A group of patients with an abnormal prothrombin time and a resected dry weight > or = 35 g was identified as a high risk group.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
This study presents a review of 519 of 553 unselected patients with carcinoma of the caecum presenting in the Plymouth Health District between 1975 and 1987. A large proportion of the patients were elderly and the median age increased throughout the study period to 76 years. One third of cases presented as an emergency and a small number was discovered at autopsy. Bowel obstruction accounted for over half the emergencies and chronic anaemia for half the elective cases. At presentation many tumours were advanced and only 5% were Dukes' A. One quarter of patients had synchronous tumours. Resection was performed in most cases, and this was attempted even in the presence of local invasion and liver metastases. Morbidity following resection was low and only six anastomotic leaks were clinically apparent. The mortality rate following resection was 2.6% and was higher for emergency procedures. The age-adjusted 5-year survival rate was 37% and rose to 64% for those undergoing 'curative' surgery. These results suggest that future improvements in the management of right colon cancer may lie with early referral and diagnosis. This study further highlights the importance of good perioperative care in the increasingly elderly patient.
A total of 519 patients presenting with carcinoma of the caecum in the Plymouth Health District between 1975 and 1987 were reviewed. The clinical course was determined in relation to patients with and without a history of previous appendicectomy. There was no difference in the incidence of previous appendicectomy between patients with carcinoma of the caecum and an age and sex matched control group. The presence of synchronous carcinomas and/or adenomas was unrelated to previous appendicectomy. Ten patients presented with appendicitis and 11 with a mucocele of the appendix as the first sign of carcinoma of the caecum. Previous appendicectomy was associated with a higher incidence of local fixity, invasion of the abdominal wall, metastatic spread and poor differentiation. These differences were reflected in a significantly lower resection rate for carcinomas in patients who had previously undergone appendicectomy. The survival of patients who had previously had appendicectomy was significantly reduced. Four independent prognostic factors for survival were identified using multivariate discriminant analysis. These were Dukes' classification, local invasion, tumour differentiation and previous appendicectomy. Local recurrence was more common in patients who had previously had appendicectomy and was often in the old appendicectomy wound itself. Appendicectomy does not increase the risk of carcinogenesis in the caecum. In this study a history of appendicectomy was an independent risk factor for survival and significantly worsened the prognosis for patients who subsequently developed carcinoma of the caecum.