Z Freinkel | PubMed Health

PubMed1990

APACHE II in emergency operations for perforated ulcers.

Most reports concerning the management of patients with perforated peptic ulcers suffer from inadequate documentation of the severity of illness and the operative risk of these patients. This study attempts to evaluate the prognostic value of the APACHE II scoring system in a homogeneous group of patients with perforated peptide ulcers, to assess it as a potential clinical and research tool for future studies, and to examine its usefulness in stratifying these patients according to their surgical risk. Our results confirm the prognostic value of the APACHE II scoring system, measured either retrospectively or prospectively, in patients who undergo emergency operations for perforated ulcers. When measured preoperatively, it accurately stratifies these patients to various risk groups and should therefore be used in future trials examining various treatment aspects of this condition. Our data, evaluating the results of various procedures in subgroups of patients stratified by the APACHE II, failed to support the superiority of one approach over another.

Duodenal Ulcer↗

PubMed1988

Aggressive treatment of severe diffuse peritonitis: a prospective study.

In a prospective study of 22 patients with diffuse peritonitis managed by the method of electively staged multiple laparotomies, the abdomen was left open in 9 patients. The patients were selected on the basis of the severity of their intra-abdominal infection: only massive faecal peritonitis, postoperative peritonitis and pancreatic abscesses were included. These amounted to only 9 per cent of all patients with intra-abdominal infection treated over a 2-year period. Up to seven re-operations were required per patient. In view of a high mortality rate of 32 per cent, the superiority of this aggressive management strategy over conventional methods is not fully established.

Adult↗