Biomedical subjects

Z Huijsmans

Publications and source records attributed to Z Huijsmans.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

Introduction of diabetes passports involving both patients and professionals to improve hospital outpatient diabetes care.

AIM: To investigate whether a comprehensive strategy involving both patients and professionals, with the introduction of a diabetes passport as a key component, improves diabetes care. METHODS: The first 150 consecutive patients who visited their internist for a diabetes check up at the internal medicine outpatient departments at each of nine Dutch general hospitals were included in this 1 year clustered, randomised, controlled trial. Health care professionals attended an educational meeting about the use and dissemination of the diabetes passport which is a patient held record. They also received aggregated feedback on baseline data and personal feedback. Educational meetings were also organised for patients. Patient files were used in conjunction with questionnaires to determine adherence rates. Data were analysed using multilevel regression analysis. RESULTS: Small but significant changes were found in mean HbA1c levels. In the intervention group, positive health changes for patients were found (-0.3%) when compared to those in the control group (+0.2%). Diastolic blood pressure improved slightly, but no changes were found in systolic blood pressure or cholesterol. Improvements were found with regard to levels of examination of patients' feet and in patient education. CONCLUSIONS: Efforts to improve professional practice involving both professionals and patients led to small improvements in HbA1c and diastolic blood pressure levels. Further study is needed to establish whether a better structured health care delivery, operating in a more supportive environment can enhance these effects.

Ambulatory Care↗

PubMed2004

Patients and nurses determine variation in adherence to guidelines at Dutch hospitals more than internists or settings.

AIMS: To measure adherence to recently developed diabetes guidelines at Dutch hospital outpatient clinics and distinguish determinants for variations in care on hospital, internist and patient levels. METHODS: Thirteen general hospitals with 58 internists recruited 1950 diabetic patients. Data were extracted from medical files (n = 1915) and from patient questionnaires (n = 1465). Multilevel logistic regression analysis was performed to explain differences in adherence rates to the guidelines. RESULTS: Adherence to process measures was high, except for the examination of feet, calculation of the body mass index and patient education activities (the mean of 12 process measures was 64%). Adherence to intermediate outcome indicators was moderate. The mean percentage of patients with HbA(1c) < 7.0% was 23%. Adherence variation on a hospital level was very small (0.6-7.9%), on an internist level moderate (0.4-18.8%) and on a patient level high (74.4-98.8%). Adherence to all process measures and most of the intermediate outcome indicators was highest in the patients seen by a diabetes specialist nurse. DISCUSSION: More focus on patient involvement in diabetic care and the contribution of diabetes specialist nurses may be important factors in improving the quality of diabetes care.

Body Mass Index↗

PubMed2001

Implementation barriers for general practice guidelines on low back pain a qualitative study.

STUDY DESIGN: Qualitative study design, using semi-structured interviews. OBJECTIVE: To explore factors that determine non-adherence to the guidelines for low back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Guidelines for low back pain have been published in the past decade in various countries. In the Netherlands, general practitioners adhere to them to a fair extent, and it is unclear whether room for improvement remains. METHODS: Forty semistructured, in-depth interviews were conducted with twenty patients who consulted for low back pain, and with their general practitioners. The interviews were fully transcribed and analyzed qualitatively. RESULTS: Patients often had limited expectations of the consultation. They wanted to hear a diagnosis or expected to receive simple advice. The general practitioners said they were well informed about the guideline and mostly agreed with its content. Reasons for non-adherence were mainly related to patients' experiences in the past and general practitioners' interpretations of their preferences. General practitioners stated that they were inclined to give in to patients' demands, for example the request for radiographic films or a referral to a physical therapist. In general, patients and their general practitioners were satisfied with the chosen management. CONCLUSIONS: Improvement of the quality of back pain care may still be possible. Implementation strategies should aim at training physicians in communication skills, especially about subjects for debate, where patients' beliefs and experiences color their expectations.

Adult↗