PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

Zachery R Reichert

Publications and source records attributed to Zachery R Reichert.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Prospective Evaluation of Circulating Tumor DNA in Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer.

PURPOSE: There are few established prognostic biomarkers in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). Disease volume and timing of metastases are prognostic and predictive factors but may be inadequate due to heterogeneity. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) provides both circulating volume (tumor fraction [TF]) and genomic data. There are limited data on ctDNA in mHSPC. METHODS: This was a multicenter, prospective study of ctDNA testing in mHSPC. Presented here are the results before androgen-deprivation therapy initiation. The primary objective was to evaluate the association between TF and overall survival (OS) and time to mCRPC (TTCRPC). Secondary analyses included evaluating outcomes in subgroups of interest and key genomic subtypes. RESULTS: Between 2018 and 2024, 85 patients were enrolled, of whom 72 (25% Black) had evaluable baseline ctDNA samples and are included herein. Baseline TF was positive in 46 patients (64%). Compared with patients with negative ctDNA TF, most patients with positive ctDNA TF had de novo (87% v 39%, P < .001) and high-volume disease (80% v 46%, P = .01). At a median follow-up of 20.8 months, median OS was not reached (NR) with those with negative ctDNA TF and 33 months with positive ctDNA TF (hazard ratio [HR], 3.33 [95% CI, 1.1 to 9.9]; P = .03). However, a negative TF at baseline was associated with an undetectable 7-month prostate-specific antigen, a validated OS surrogate. Median TTCRPC was NR versus 13 months (HR, 3.43 [95% CI, 1.5 to 7.9]; P = .004). ctDNA TF was also potentially prognostic in high-volume disease and those who received doublet therapy. CONCLUSION: In this diverse cohort, a positive ctDNA TF at baseline was associated with worse outcomes in mHSPC and may potentially complement current further risk stratification tools.

Humans

Association between smoking, tumor genetics, and outcomes in men with metastatic prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: Smoking has been associated with increased metastatic prostate cancer mortality, but the mechanisms behind this are largely unknown. We hypothesized that smoking increases the risk of genetic alterations associated with aggressive disease and/or the transformation to neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We utilized the Prostate Cancer Precision Medicine Multi-institutional Collaborative Effort (PROMISE) clinical genomic database for this retrospective analysis. We associated patient characteristics and tumor genetic data with smoking exposure at diagnosis (current, former, never and pack years) and with clinical outcomes, including overall survival (OS) from diagnosis or time to developing metastatic disease and NEPC status. RESULTS: We identified 2353 men with prostate cancer and next generation somatic tumor sequencing evaluable for analysis in PROMISE, including 8% current, 39% former, and 52% never smokers. Current smokers were more likely to be younger and to have metastatic (M1 or N1) disease at diagnosis, and less likely to have prior local therapy (all p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001). Current smoking was associated with worse OS from diagnosis (99.9 mo vs 137.6 mo, HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.14-1.77), which remained significant after adjusting for disease characteristics. We found no difference in the percentage of NEPC at initial diagnosis or at any time between current, former, and never smokers (p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.8). We found positive associations between smoking status and genetic alterations in SPOP (current: 15%, former 6.7%, never 3.8%; p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.018), FGFR1 (current 10%, former 0.4%, never 1.1% p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.001), and ARID1A (current 5.1%, former 2.2%, never 0.4%; p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.035) in patients with&#xa0;metastatic androgen pathway modulator sensitive prostate cancer (APMS). CONCLUSION: Active smoking is associated with worse overall and prostate cancer specific survival as compared to never/former smoking and was associated with specific tumor genetic alterations but not small cell/NEPC transformation.

Journal Article