PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 10023419

Imaging techniques for fibroid detection.

V Hurley
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Ultrasound imaging techniques, both transabdominal and transvaginal, are the most accurate and widely used imaging modalities in the detection and characterization of uterine leiomyomas. The diagnosis of these tumours may be enhanced using ultrasound-guided uterine biopsy and hysterosonography. Magnetic resonance imaging provides accurate imaging information, but its cost and lack of significant superiority over ultrasound have hitherto limited its use. Computerized tomography, plain X-ray, and hysterosalpingography have little to offer in the assessment of fibroids.

Explore related subjects

Biopsy, NeedleFemaleHumansLeiomyomaMagnetic Resonance ImagingTomography, X-Ray ComputedUltrasonography, InterventionalUterine NeoplasmsJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

V Hurley. 1998. Imaging techniques for fibroid detection.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0950-3552(98)80062-x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Targeting difficult accessible breast lesions: MRI-guided needle localization using a freehand technique in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet.

PURPOSE: To report the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided needle localization for diagnosis of MRI detected suspicious breast lesions located in difficult accessible regions of the breast, using the freehand method in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In five patients with five MRI-only breast lesions underwent MRI-guided needle localization for histopathologic evaluation of the lesions. All interventional procedures were performed in a 3.0 T MRI system with the patient in prone position and by using a dedicated phased array breast coil. MRI-guided needle localizations were performed by using a freehand technique. In our study, the high-resolution scan allowed preprocedural localization of all lesions without use of contrast enhancement. In all cases contrast-enhanced MRI was performed after insertion of the wire to confirm the tip of the wire in direct contact with the enhancing lesion. RESULTS: Needle localizations were performed in five patients. Histopathologic evaluation of tissue after surgery excision biopsy revealed one lymph node, three invasive ductal carcinoma and one ductal carcinoma in situ. Lesion size varied from 6 to 30 mm. Mean duration time was 25 min. No complications occurred during the intervention method. In the patient with the benign lesion control MRI of the breast after 6 months confirmed lesion removal. CONCLUSIONS: MRI-guided needle localization by using a freehand technique in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet is a safe and accurate method for diagnosis of difficult accessible breast lesions only visible on MRI.

Biopsy, Needle↗