PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10030099

[Communications difficulties during the medical interview].

Abstract

The aims of medical interview are to obtain diagnostic information, to obtain an empathetic communication with the patient, to educate him about his disease and to establish a personal link allowing a lasting relationship. We analyze some features of communication with patients. Individualized communication, recognizing his identity and personal aspects, "looking from the patient". Context, a shared but not mentioned value, part of the world of emotions and ideas. An analog and digital language, the former precise in words and the latter more diffuse, with gestures, not verbal. Coherence, as the similitude between what we think, feel and say. If there is no coherence, communication is impaired. Emotions, always present, rending communication more valid and real. We need to recognize, express and respond to emotions. An emotionless patient becomes a distant and impersonal object, an "it". When emotions are incorporated the patient is a "him" with whom I share and dialog. Empathy is an emotional comprehension, a personal bond. It improves relationships and creates links. Compassion is a variation of empathy that includes spiritual aspects and values. Negative emotions as rage, frustration and aggression creates communicational difficulties. We must recognize, express and clarify them to improve the situation. Difficult patients with whom communication is difficult such as confuse, agitated, terminal, elder, manipulating or hypochondriac subjects. The idea of transference and counter transference in these complicated situations is analyzed.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H Baeza, K Weil. 1998. [Communications difficulties during the medical interview].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10030099/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Information-sharing among couples considering multifetal pregnancy reduction.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the information-sharing strategies of couples considering fetal reduction, and the impact of these strategies on the chances of encountering hostility in their social networks. DESIGN: Cross-sectional design of semistructured qualitative interviews, coded with respect to sharing strategies and level of personally directed hostility encountered. SETTING: Multiple Pregnancy Management Program, Comprehensive Genetics, New York, New York. PATIENT(S) AND INTERVENTION(S): Fifty women and their partners who were making a first visit to our maternal-fetal management facility, in order to consider the possibility of multifetal reduction as a pregnancy-management strategy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Development of information-sharing strategies, and the chances of encountering personally directed hostility regarding multifetal reduction associated with more and less selective strategies. RESULT(S): Four information-sharing strategies emerged from the analysis. Two of these strategies were relatively open (extended network, and both parents). Two other strategies were relatively selective (qualified family and friends, and defended relationship). The selective strategies were significantly less likely to encounter to encounter personally directed hostility (odds ratio, 3.88; 95% confidence intervals, 0.87-17.30). CONCLUSION(S): Selective sharing of information for couples considering multifetal prgnancy reduction is a potentially useful strategy for moderating potentially stressful relationships in their social networks. Clinics should find a way of integrating the discussion of selective sharing into their clinic's cultural repertoire of patient-support services.

Communication↗