Using a tilt table to evaluate syncope.

W N Kapoor

doi:10.1097/00000441-199902000-00005

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 10037114

Using a tilt table to evaluate syncope.

W N Kapoor

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Upright tilt testing is commonly used in the evaluation of patients with syncope to provoke hypotension and/or bradycardia in the laboratory. The most common type of response is provocation of neurally mediated syndrome (vasovagal syncope). The American College of Cardiology Expert Consensus has proposed indications for tilt testing. The most common indication is recurrent syncope of unexplained cause. Upright tilt testing methods have not been standardized. The most common protocols in this country use a tilt angle of 60-80 degrees and use isoproterenol infusion after a period of drug-free tilt testing. The sensitivity of upright tilt testing is estimated to be 67-83%, and the specificity is between 75 and 100%. The reproducibility of the test has been variable. In patients with unexplained syncope, positive responses are found to be 50% without the use of isoproterenol and 64% with the use of isoproterenol. Many different treatments have been used. At this time, there is no consensus regarding the most effective treatment. Beta-blockers and fludrocortisone plus salt are the most commonly used drugs. Pacemakers have been used, but their role is ill-defined at this time.

Explore related subjects

Adrenergic beta-Agonists Autonomic Nervous System Diagnosis, Differential Humans Isoproterenol Sensitivity and Specificity Syncope Tilt-Table Test Journal Article Review

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

W N Kapoor. 1999. Using a tilt table to evaluate syncope.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000441-199902000-00005

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2000

Insulin activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases Erk1,2 is amplified via beta-adrenergic receptor expression and requires the integrity of the Tyr350 of the receptor.

Insulin activates a complex set of intracellular responses, including the activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases Erk1,2. The counterregulatory actions of insulin on catecholamine action are well known and include phosphorylation of the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor on Tyr(350), Tyr(354), and Tyr(364) in the C-terminal cytoplasmic domain, as well as enhanced sequestration of the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor. Both beta-adrenergic agonists and insulin provoke sequestration of beta(2)-adrenergic receptors in a synergistic manner. In the current work, cross-talk between insulin action and beta(2)-adrenergic receptors revealed that insulin activation of Erk1,2 was amplified via beta(2)-adrenergic receptors. In Chinese hamster ovary cells, expression of beta(2)-adrenergic receptors enhanced 5-10-fold the activation of Erk1,2 by insulin and prolonged the activation, the greatest enhancement occurring at 5 min post-insulin. The potentiation of insulin signaling on Erk1,2 was proportional to the level of expression of beta(2)-adrenergic receptor. The potentiation of insulin signaling requires the integrity of Tyr(350) of the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor, a residue phosphorylated in response to insulin. beta(2)-adrenergic receptors with a Y350F mutation failed to potentiate insulin activation of Erk1,2. Expression of the C-terminal domain of the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor (Pro(323)-Leu(418)) in cells expressing the intact beta(2)-adrenergic receptor acts as a dominant negative, blocking the potentiation of insulin activation of Erk1,2 via the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor. Blockade of beta(2)-adrenergic receptor sequestration does not alter the ability of the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor to potentiate insulin action on Erk1,2. We propose a new paradigm in which a G-protein-linked receptor, such as the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor, itself acts as a receptor-based scaffold via its binding site for Src homology 2 domains, facilitating signaling of the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway by insulin.

Adrenergic beta-Agonists↗

PubMed2000

Comparison of bisoprolol and carvedilol cardioprotection in a rabbit ischemia and reperfusion model.

Carvedilol, a selective alpha(1) and non-selective beta-adrenoceptor antagonist and antioxidant, has been shown to provide significant cardiac protection in animal models of myocardial ischemia. To further explore the mechanisms contributing to the efficacy of carvedilol cardioprotection, the effects of carvedilol on hemodynamic variables, infarct size and myeloperoxidase activity (an index of neutrophil accumulation) were compared with a beta(1) selective adrenoceptor antagonist, bisoprolol. Carvedilol (1 mg/kg) or bisoprolol (1 mg/kg) was given intravenously 5 min before reperfusion. In vehicle-treated rabbits, ischemia (45 min) and reperfusion (240 min) resulted in significant increases in left ventricular end diastolic pressure, large myocardial infarction (64.7+/-2.6% of area-at-risk) and a marked increase in myeloperoxidase activity (64+/-14 U/g protein in area-at-risk). Carvedilol treatment resulted in sustained reduction of the pressure-rate-index and significantly smaller infarcts (30+/-2.9, P<0.01 vs. vehicle) as well as decreased myeloperoxidase activity (26+/-11 U/g protein in area-at-risk, P<0.01 vs. vehicle). Administration of bisoprolol at 1 mg/kg resulted in a pressure-rate-index comparable to that of carvedilol and also decreased infarct size (48.4+/-2.5%, P<0.001 vs. vehicle, P<0.05 vs. carvedilol), although to a significantly lesser extent than that observed with carvedilol. Treatment with bisoprolol failed to reduce myeloperoxidase activity in the ischemic myocardial tissue. In addition, carvedilol, but not bisoprolol, markedly decreased cardiac membrane lipid peroxidation measured by thiobarbituric acid formation. Taken together, this study suggests that the superior cardioprotection of carvedilol over bisoprolol is possibly the result of carvedilol's antioxidant and anti-neutrophil effects, not its hemodynamic properties.

Adrenergic beta-Agonists↗

PubMed2000

BRL37344, but not CGP12177, stimulates fuel oxidation by soleus muscle in vitro.

The beta(3)-adrenoceptor agonist, (RR+SS)-(+/-)-4-[2-)2-)3-chlorophenyl)-2-hydroxyethyl)amino)propyl]ph enoxyacetate (BRL37344), stimulated fuel utilisation by isolated mouse soleus muscle at concentrations 10- to 100-fold lower than those required to stimulate lipolysis in brown adipocytes. At 1x10(-10) M BRL37344, uptake and phosphorylation of 2-deoxyglucose was increased (40%), as was glucose-oxidation (50%), palmitate-oxidation (70%) and oxidation of [2-14C]pyruvate (2-fold), indicating stimulation of tricarboxylic acid cycle reactions. Oxidation of [1-14C]pyruvate was unaffected, indicating no stimulation of pyruvate dehydrogenase activity. Other beta(3)-adrenoceptor agonists, disodium(RR)-5-[2-[[2-(3-chlorophenyl)-2-hydroxyethyl]-amino]propyl]- 1,3-benzodioxazole-2,2-dicarboxylate (CL316,243, 1x10(-7) M) and (S)-4-¿2-[2-hydroxy-3-(4-hydroxyphenoxy)propylamino]ethyl¿pheno xymeth ylcyclohexylphosphiric acid lithium salt (SB226552, 1x10(-9) M), achieved similar stimulation of 2-deoxyglucose uptake and phosphorylation but (+/-)-4-(3-t-butylamino-2-hydroxypropoxy)benzimidazol-2-one (CGP12177A) had no effect. The inhibitor of protein kinase A, H-89 (isoquinolinesulfonamide), had little effect on the stimulation of pyruvate-oxidation by BRL37344, while the specific inhibitor of protein kinase C, bisindolylmaleimide IX, reduced the stimulated rate to slightly below basal values. We consider that these responses provide evidence of the presence of a novel beta-adrenoceptor in skeletal muscle, which we have termed beta(skel)-adrenoceptor.

Adrenergic beta-Agonists↗