PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10065708

Recognizing misfolded and distorted protein structures by the assumption-based similarity score.

Abstract

A new similarity score (sigma-score) is proposed which is able to find the correct protein structure among the very close alternatives and to distinguish between correct and deliberately misfolded structures. This score is based on the general principle 'similar likes similar', and it favors hydrophobic and hydrophilic contacts, and disfavors hydrophobic-to-hydrophilic contacts in proteins. The values of sigma-scores calculated for the high-resolution protein structures from the representative set are compared with those of alternatives: (i) very close alternatives which are only slightly distorted by conformational energy minimization in vacuo; (ii) alternatives with subsequently growing distortions, generated by molecular dynamics simulations in vacuo; (iii) structures derived by molecular dynamics simulation in solvent at 300 K; (iv) deliberately misfolded protein models. In nearly all tested cases the similarity score can successfully distinguish between experimental structure and its alternatives, even if the root mean square displacement of all heavy atoms is less than 1 A. The confidence interval of the similarity score was estimated using the high-resolution X-ray structures of domain pairs related by non-crystallographic symmetry. The similarity score can be used for the evaluation of the general quality of the protein models, choosing the correct structures among the very close alternatives, characterization of models simulating folding/unfolding, etc.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A P Golovanov, P E Volynsky, S B Ermakova, A S Arseniev. 1999. Recognizing misfolded and distorted protein structures by the assumption-based similarity score.. https://doi.org/10.1093/protein%2F12.1.31

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Covariates-dependent confidence intervals for the difference or ratio of two median survival times.

In this paper, we are concerned with the estimation of the discrepancy between two treatments when right-censored survival data are accompanied with covariates. Conditional confidence intervals given the available covariates are constructed for the difference between or ratio of two median survival times under the unstratified and stratified Cox proportional hazards models, respectively. The proposed confidence intervals provide the information about the difference in survivorship for patients with common covariates but in different treatments. The results of a simulation study investigation of the coverage probability and expected length of the confidence intervals suggest the one designed for the stratified Cox model when data fit reasonably with the model. When the stratified Cox model is not feasible, however, the one designed for the unstratified Cox model is recommended. The use of the confidence intervals is finally illustrated with a HIV+ data set.

Confidence Intervals↗

Inferences on standardized mean difference: the generalized variable approach.

The standardized mean difference has been widely used as the most common index of effect magnitude in many applied fields. In this paper, we propose a novel approach using the concept of generalized variable for the confidence interval estimation and hypothesis testing of standardized mean difference. Furthermore, we extend this approach to compare standardized mean differences between two studies or between two strata. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed approach can provide confidence intervals with excellent coverage properties and can perform hypothesis testing with satisfactory type-I error control.

Confidence Intervals↗

Interval estimation for rank correlation coefficients based on the probit transformation with extension to measurement error correction of correlated ranked data.

The Spearman (rho(s)) and Kendall (tau) rank correlation coefficient are routinely used as measures of association between non-normally distributed random variables. However, confidence limits for rho(s) are only available under the assumption of bivariate normality and for tau under the assumption of asymptotic normality of tau. In this paper, we introduce another approach for obtaining confidence limits for rho(s) or tau based on the arcsin transformation of sample probit score correlations. This approach is shown to be applicable for an arbitrary bivariate distribution. The arcsin-based estimators for rho(s) and tau (denoted by rho(s,a), tau(a)) are shown to have asymptotic relative efficiency (ARE) of 9/pi2 compared with the usual estimators rho(s) and tau when rho(s) and tau are, respectively, 0. In some nutritional applications, the Spearman rank correlation between nutrient intake as assessed by a reference instrument versus nutrient intake as assessed by a surrogate instrument is used as a measure of validity of the surrogate instrument. However, if only a single replicate (or a few replicates) are available for the reference instrument, then the estimated Spearman rank correlation will be downwardly biased due to measurement error. In this paper, we use the probit transformation as a tool for specifying an ANOVA-type model for replicate ranked data resulting in a point and interval estimate of a measurement error corrected rank correlation. This extends previous work by Rosner and Willett for obtaining point and interval estimates of measurement error corrected Pearson correlations.

Confidence Intervals↗