PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 10071843

Laparoscopic and open appendectomies--average charges, 1997.

M Mushinski
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

During 1997 the average total charge for an open appendectomy (OA) was $9,670 while that for a laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) was $11,290. The 20 study states (those with 50 or more OAs) accounted for 77 percent of the 2,979 OA procedures investigated. The total charges ranged from $12,800 in California to $6,540 in Oklahoma. The hospital charges were more than 30 percent higher than the U.S. norm in California and Florida and more than 30 percent below it in Oklahoma and Washington. New York and New Jersey reported the highest physicians' fees while the Michigan doctors' charges were 35 percent below the average. Length of stay for an open appendectomy averaged 2.92 days across the country and ranged from 3.33 days in New York to 2.33 days in Colorado. The hospital plus physicians' charges for LAs ranged from $14,350 in California (27 percent above the norm) to $9,210 in Colorado (18 percent below). California and Florida reported the highest hospital charges whereas those in New York were the lowest. The physicians' fees ranged from $4,280 in New York to $1,830 in Colorado. The patients with LAs remained in the hospital, on average, 2.22 days. The length of stay ranged from almost three days in Ohio to 1.62 days in Colorado.

Explore related subjects

AppendectomyFees and ChargesHospital ChargesHumansLaparoscopyLength of StayUnited StatesJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M Mushinski. Laparoscopic and open appendectomies--average charges, 1997.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10071843/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

The natural history and traditional management of appendicitis revisited: spontaneous resolution and predominance of prehospital perforations imply that a correct diagnosis is more important than an early diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: The principle of early exploration on wide indications in order to prevent perforation has been the guiding star for the management of patients with suspected appendicitis for over 100 years, dating back to a time when appendicitis was a significant cause of mortality. Since then there has been a dramatic decrease in mortality due to appendicitis. Emerging evidence calls for a new understanding of the natural history of untreated appendicitis. This motivates a reappraisal of the fundamental principles for the management of patients with suspected appendicitis. METHODS: Analysis of epidemiologic and clinical studies that elucidate the natural history of appendicitis, i.e. the possibility of spontaneous resolution or the risk of progression to perforation, the determinants of the proportion of perforations and mortality, and the consequence of in-hospital delay. RESULTS: The results presented in a number of studies suggest that spontaneous resolution of appendicitis is common, that perforation can seldom be prevented, that the risk of perforation has been exaggerated and that in-hospital delay is safe. An alternative understanding of the inverse relationship between the proportion of negative explorations and perforation and the increasing proportion of perforation with length of time is presented, mainly explaining these findings by selection due to spontaneous resolution. CONCLUSION: Evidence suggests that spontaneous resolution of untreated, non-perforated appendicitis is common and that perforation can rarely be prevented and is associated with a lower increase in mortality than was previously thought. This motivates a shift in focus from the prevention of perforation to the early detection and treatment of advanced appendicitis. In order to minimize mortality, morbidity and costs avoidance of negative appendectomies is more important then preventing perforation. In patients with an equivocal diagnosis where advanced appendicitis is deemed less likely a correct diagnosis is more important than a rapid diagnosis. These patients can safely be managed by active observation with an improved diagnostic work-up under observation, which has consistently shown a low proportion of negative appendectomies without an increase in the proportion of perforations or morbidity. A high proportion of perforations can be explained by selection due to undiagnosed resolving appendicitis. The proportion of perforation is therefore a questionable measure of the quality of the management of patients with suspected appendicitis and should be used with caution.

Appendectomy↗