PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10073373

Cost-utility analysis in schizophrenia.

Abstract

Estimation of quality of life is important to the study of the pharmacoeconomics of schizophrenia. The subject has gained popularity among policymakers, clinicians, and patients and their families, since the advent of new antipsychotic medications that are more expensive than older drugs yet have been shown to cause fewer side effects. Quantifying quality of life has been difficult, since studies often inconsistently define the concept or use rating scales that are inappropriate for the patient population. Utility analysis is a procedure that calculates subjects' preferences regarding living with various health states, given such options as trading more years of life at a lowered health state for dying sooner but having a strong health state during the last years of life. The feasibility of performing utility analysis among patients with schizophrenia was recently examined in a study carried out by the authors. This article reflects initial observations from that study of utility analysis and includes a discussion of problems still facing the study of quality of life and utility analysis.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A G Awad, L P Voruganti. 1999. Cost-utility analysis in schizophrenia.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10073373/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Differential pharmacology of atypical antipsychotics: clinical implications.

PURPOSE: Pharmacology of atypical antipsychotics and the clinical implications are reviewed. SUMMARY: Psychiatric disorders, such as schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, are often associated with poor outcomes. Atypical antipsychotics have become the standard of care for these disorders, and multiple agents have demonstrated efficacy for both acute and maintenance therapy. As a result of their differential pharmacologic properties, atypical antipsychotics have diverse clinical profiles, resulting in different liabilities for specific adverse events. These effects can, in turn, have an adverse impact on patient functionality, adherence to therapy, and overall health. CONCLUSION: Atypical antipsychotics have distinct pharmacological profiles which result in clinically meaningful differences in adverse effects. Clinicians should have a wide choice of agents available with which to optimize outcomes in the majority of patients with psychiatric disorders.

Antipsychotic Agents↗