PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 10079240

Genomic imprinting: implications for human disease.

J G Falls·D J Pulford·A A Wylie·R L Jirtle
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Genomic imprinting refers to an epigenetic marking of genes that results in monoallelic expression. This parent-of-origin dependent phenomenon is a notable exception to the laws of Mendelian genetics. Imprinted genes are intricately involved in fetal and behavioral development. Consequently, abnormal expression of these genes results in numerous human genetic disorders including carcinogenesis. This paper reviews genomic imprinting and its role in human disease. Additional information about imprinted genes can be found on the Genomic Imprinting Website at http://www.geneimprint.com.

Explore related subjects

Angelman SyndromeBeckwith-Wiedemann SyndromeBehaviorBrainGenomic ImprintingHumansNeoplasmsPrader-Willi SyndromeJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.Review

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J G Falls, D J Pulford, A A Wylie, R L Jirtle. 1999. Genomic imprinting: implications for human disease.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9440(10)65309-6

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

Atypical cases of Angelman syndrome.

Angelman syndrome (AS) is a profound disorder notable for mental retardation and severe language deficits that results from lack of function of the maternally inherited copy of the UBE3A gene. Chromosome deletions of 15q11q13, paternal uniparental disomy (UPD), UBE3A gene mutations, and imprinting center defects are all commonly recognized mechanisms that disrupt the function of the maternal copy of the UBE3A gene. We report here two patients with different atypical etiologies of AS. The first patient is a 3-year-old boy with global developmental delay, severe speech deficits, seizures, and very happy disposition. Southern blot analysis for the maternal and paternal chromosome 15 methylation products showed a mosaic methylation pattern, suggesting an imprinting center defect. The second patient is a 4(1/2)-year-old boy with global developmental delay, no expressive language, microcephaly, seizures, and ataxic gait. Array-based comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) demonstrated a loss in copy number for two overlapping clones encompassing the UBE3A gene, indicating a partial deletion within UBE3A. His mother, who was adopted, had an identical pattern, suggesting that her deletion was probably on her paternally imprinted allele. These patients illustrate the expanding spectrum of molecular findings in AS, reinforce the need to maintain suspicion when clinical features suggest AS but initial testing is normal, and show the power of CGH as a tool to uncover partial UBE3A deletions.

Angelman Syndrome↗
PubMed2006

Prevalence of Angelman syndrome and Prader-Willi syndrome in Estonian children: sister syndromes not equally represented.

In 2000-2004, we performed a focused search for individuals with Angelman syndrome (AS) and Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) aiming to establish the prevalence data for the individuals born between 1984 and 2004 in Estonia. All persons with probable AS or PWS (n = 184) were studied using the DNA methylation test. Individuals with abnormal methylation were all further tested by chromosomal and FISH analysis, and if necessary for uniparental disomy and UBE3A gene mutation. Nineteen cases with abnormal methylation test result were identified. Seven of them had AS, including six (85.7%) due to 15q11-13 deletion and one paternal UPD15. Twelve subjects had PWS: 4 (33%) 15q11-13 deletions, 6 (50%) maternal UPD15, 1 unbalanced chromosome 14;15 translocation resulting in a chromosome 15pter-q13 deletion, and 1 Robertsonian 15q;15q translocation. The minimum livebirth prevalence in 1984-2004 for AS was 1:52,181 (95% CI 1:25,326-1:1,29,785) and for PWS 1:30,439 (95% CI 1:17,425-1:58,908). The livebirth prevalence of AS and PWS increased within this period, but the change was statistically significant only for PWS (P = 0.032), from expected 1:88,495 (95% CI 1:24,390-1:3,22,580) to expected 1:12,547 (95% CI 1:540-1:29,154). Six individuals with AS and 11 with PWS were alive on the prevalence day (January 1, 2005), indicating the point prevalence proportion of 1:56,112 (95% CI 1:25,780-1:1,52,899) and 1:30,606 (95% CI 1:17,105-1:61,311), respectively. Our results showing the birth prevalence of AS 1.7 times less than PWS challenge the opinion that both syndromes are equally represented, and are in line with the view that mutations in sperm and oocytes occur at different frequencies.

Angelman Syndrome↗
PubMed2006

Subtelomeric trisomy 21q: a new benign chromosomal variant.

The diagnosis of a subtelomeric rearrangement has immediate impact on counseling, particularly in the case of familial rearrangements. However, the existence of subtelomeric imbalances with absent phenotypic effects may hamper genetic counseling, particularly when the rearrangement has not been previously described. We report on a new subtelomeric polymorphism, consisting of a familial subtelomeric rearrangement of chromosome 19 resulting in distal trisomy for 21q, detected in a child with Angelman Syndrome (AS) due to an UBE3A mutation. This report shows that new, previously unknown, benign subtelomeric variants may complicate the correct clinical diagnosis.

Angelman Syndrome↗