PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10079662

Supervised surgical trainees can perform pancreatic resections safely.

Abstract

With the recent changes in surgical training and sub-specialisation, the role of surgical trainees in more advanced surgical procedures has come into question. In order to examine this further, we analysed the early outcome of patients in a single surgical unit undergoing pancreatic resections, with regard to the grade of the surgeon performing the operation. Between January 1994 and May 1996, data were collected prospectively on all the patients undergoing pancreatic resections with regards to the grade of the surgeon performing the procedure and the early outcome following the operation. Sixty-two patients underwent pancreatic resections for both benign and malignant diseases. Overall, 19 operations (31%) were performed by trainees under supervision, 14 of the 40 pancreatico-duodenectomies (35%) and 5 of the 19 left partial pancreatectomies (26%). All 3 total pancreatectomies were carried out by consultants. In the 43 patients operated upon by the consultants, there were 8 anastomotic leaks (19%) and 1 death. In the 19 patients operated upon by the supervised trainees, there were only 2 anastomotic leaks (11%) and no deaths. This series has demonstrated that in a unit with a major interest and large workload in pancreatic surgery, there appears to be no difference between a consultant and a supervised trainee in the early outcome following pancreatic resections.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R K Praseedom, A Paisley, K K Madhavan, O J Garden, D C Carter, S Paterson-Brown. 1999. Supervised surgical trainees can perform pancreatic resections safely.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10079662/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Geographic origin of publications in surgical journals.

BACKGROUND: Publications in peer-reviewed journals are the main determinants of research rating and funding. The present study assesses worldwide scientific contributions in the field of surgical research. METHODS: Fifteen major surgical journals were selected for a bibliometric search in Medline/PubMed over a 6-year period (2000-2005). All articles with abstracts were totalled according to country of corresponding author. Publications (total and corrected for population size) and journal impact factor were assessed according to country. RESULTS: A total of 18,717 articles were identified. Fifteen countries generated 88.8 per cent of these: the USA produced 42.1 per cent, Japan 9.1 per cent and the UK 7.6 per cent. When corrected for population size, the Netherlands, Sweden and Switzerland topped the ranking; the USA was sixth. Ireland and Switzerland scored the highest mean impact factor. CONCLUSION: The USA is the most productive country in terms of absolute number of surgical publications in the selected journals. However, when population size is taken into consideration, certain smaller European countries were more prolific.

General Surgery↗

Surgical oncology.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

General Surgery↗