PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 1008168

[Bidimentional spatial biometry].

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

L Konings, M Van Celst. 1976. [Bidimentional spatial biometry].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1008168/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Small size at birth and greater postnatal weight gain: relationships to diminished infant lung function.

Recent evidence suggests that impaired lung development is linked with diminished lung function and an increased risk of chronic obstructive airway disease in adulthood. To examine environmental influences on early lung development, we measured lung function in 131 normal-term infants aged 5-14 weeks. Adjusting for age at measurement, FEV at 0.4 seconds fell by 4.4% for each standard deviation decrease in birth weight (p = 0.047); when adjusted for FVC, FEV at 0.4 seconds was not related to birth weight but fell by 3.2% per standard deviation increase in infant weight gain (p = 0.001). Age- and sex-adjusted total respiratory system compliance fell by 7.0% per standard deviation decrease in birth weight (p < 0.001) but was not related to infant weight gain. In univariate analyses, age-adjusted forced expiratory flow at functional residual capacity was not related to birth weight, but decreased by 11.0% per standard deviation increase in infant weight gain (p = 0.007). The respiratory rate rose by 5.1% per standard deviation increase in infant weight gain (p = 0.001). Lung function measurements were not related to infant feeding. The observations suggest that lower rates of fetal growth and higher rates of early infancy weight gain are associated with impaired lung development.

Anthropometry↗

Measurement of occipitocervical angle.

STUDY DESIGN: This study compared the reliability of 3 techniques used to measure alignment between the occiput and cervical spine. OBJECTIVES: Intraobserver and interobserver intraclass correlation coefficient were computed to determine the most reliable method to measure occipitocervical angle. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: No studies have been performed comparing occipitocervical angle measurement techniques. METHODS: The angles between the inferior endplate of second cervical vertebrae and the occiput line using the Chamberlain line, McRae line, and McGregor line were measured from lateral cervical radiographs of 30 healthy volunteers. Five spine surgeons made measurements. RESULTS: Mean intraobserver variances of the angles using Chamberlain line, McRae line, and McGregor line were 2.0 degrees (ranging from 0 degrees-15 degrees), 4.7 degrees (from 0 degrees-28 degrees), and 1.5 degrees (from 0 degrees-9 degrees), respectively; intraobserver intraclass correlation coefficients of the angles were 0.956, 0.835, and 0.975. Mean interobserver variances of the angles using Chamberlain line, McRae line, and McGregor line were 2.3 degrees (from 0.4 degrees-6.4 degrees), 5.0 degrees (from 1.8 degrees-11.9 degrees), and 1.4 degrees (from 0 degrees-4.5 degrees), respectively; interobserver intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.939, 0.802, and 0.972. The highest reliability indexes were obtained for McGregor line. CONCLUSIONS: The McGregor line is the most reproducible and reliable method for measurement of the occipitocervical angle.

Anthropometry↗