PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10087646

Schizophrenia: refining the phenotype, resolving endophenotypes.

Abstract

The conceptual history of the diagnosis of schizophrenia is reviewed and the current definition of the illness is examined (e.g. DSM-IV). A dimensional alternative to the traditional categorical model of diagnosis is discussed with a specific emphasis on the four dimensions of psychopathology represented by reality distortion (hallucinations, delusions), disorganization (positive formal thought disorder, bizarre behavior), negative symptoms (flattened affect, avolition, alogia, asociality), and premorbid social functioning. Also discussed is the development of structured psychiatric interviews that emerged from the clinical/research context that gave rise to explicit (i.e. operational) diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia. The general methodological approach used to detect valid endophenotypes for schizophrenia liability--i.e. indicators of liability not visible to the unaided naked eye--as well as their potential diagnostic and research utility is presented in overview. The rationale for linking such indicators to schizophrenia liability, which is conceptualized as a latent construct, is also reviewed. Future directions in the development and refinement of the diagnostic approach to schizophrenia and schizophrenia liability are highlighted.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M F Lenzenweger. 1999. Schizophrenia: refining the phenotype, resolving endophenotypes.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0005-7967(98)00138-7

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Smoking and Parkinson's disease in twins.

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that cigarette smoking protects against the development of PD. BACKGROUND: Smoking has been inversely associated with PD in many studies, but whether this reflects a biologic effect on the underlying disease process or merely confounding or selection bias remains uncertain. METHODS: The authors compared smoking histories in male twin pairs identified from the National Academy of Sciences--National Research Council World War II Veteran Twins Cohort. The amount of cigarettes smoked (in pack-years) was collected until the time of PD onset in the affected twin or until the time of death for the unaffected twin, whichever came first. Differences in pack-years smoked until PD onset and until 10 and 20 years before onset were compared using paired t-tests. Comparisons were made overall and stratified by zygosity and concordance for PD. To assess the role of shared environment, correlation for smoking behaviors was compared between pairs concordant and discordant for PD. RESULTS: Detailed smoking histories were available for 113 twin pairs in which at least one twin had PD (discordant pairs: 43 monozygotic [MZ], 50 dizygotic [DZ]; concordant pairs: 10 MZ, 10 DZ). Within-pair correlation for ever smoking was high in MZ pairs (phi = 0.47, p = 0.001) but not in DZ pairs (phi = 0.007, p = 0.96). In 33 discordant MZ pairs and 39 discordant DZ pairs in which at least one twin had smoked, the twins without PD smoked more than their brothers smoked (32.5 vs. 22.7 pack-years, p = 0.026). This was more marked in the MZ pairs (37.1 vs. 25.3 pack-years, p = 0.077) than in the DZ pairs (28.6 vs. 20.5 pack-years, p = 0.17). A similar relationship was seen when smoking dose was calculated only until 10 years before PD onset, suggesting that the lower dose of smoking in the twin with PD was not the result of early, undiagnosed disease. CONCLUSION: Within twin pairs, risk of PD is inversely correlated with the dose (in pack-years) of cigarette smoking. This effect is most pronounced in MZ twins, despite the high correlation for smoking. Because MZ twins are genetically identical and are similar behaviorally, this difference is unlikely to result from either genetic factors or environmental confounders. These results are compatible with a true biologic protective effect of cigarette smoking.

Diseases in Twins↗

Twin studies in psychiatry and psychology: science or pseudoscience?

Twin studies are frequently cited in support of the influence of genetic factors for a wide range of psychiatric conditions and psychological trait differences. The most common method, known as the classical twin method, compares the concordance rates or correlations of reared-together identical (MZ) vs. reared-together same-sex fraternal (DZ) twins. However, drawing genetic inferences from MZ-DZ comparisons is problematic due to methodological problems and questionable assumptions. It is argued that the main theoretical assumption of the twin method--known as the "equal environment assumption"--is not tenable. The twin method is therefore of doubtful value as an indicator of genetic influences. Studies of reared-apart twins are discussed, and it is noted that these studies are also vulnerable to methodological problems and environmental confounds. It is concluded that there is little reason to believe that twin studies provide evidence in favor of genetic influences on psychiatric disorders and human behavioral differences.

Diseases in Twins↗