PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10090055

Rodent quarantine programs: purpose, principles, and practice.

Abstract

In animal research, validity and reproducibility of data are critically influenced by the microbial status of the experimental animals. One of the most crucial aspects of assuring quality in animal research is providing research personnel with confidence that experimental results will not be invalidated due to interference caused by infectious disease. An effective quarantine program is essential to providing this assurance. Quarantine programs are generally instituted to prevent the introduction of rodent pathogens into established specific-pathogen-free colonies in a facility. Therefore, programs should be designed to isolate newly acquired rodents until their health status can be determined and to maximize the probability that microorganisms of interest will be detected before the animals are introduced into (and thus, could potentially contaminate) established colonies. Important principles that are critical to designing an effective quarantine program will be discussed here, as will the practical implementation of these principles. Although quarantine programs may be costly in terms of time and effort, these costs must be balanced against the potential costs of disease outbreaks that could invalidate long-term studies, alter normal biological baselines, and cause the loss or necessitate re-derivation of rare or valuable strains of rodents. Reducing the incidence of quarantine failures through appropriate program design and implementation helps to maintain the confidence of research personnel in the value of quarantine programs and in our competence as specialists in laboratory animal management and as partners in the research process.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J E Rehg, L A Toth. 1998. Rodent quarantine programs: purpose, principles, and practice.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10090055/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Dairy-cattle health in Gyeongnam, Korea.

An animal-health monitoring system in the Gyeongnam area was started in 1997 to develop statistically valid data for use in estimating disease frequencies in dairy cattle, and the associated costs. The objectives of this study were to: (1) describe what was done to implement and maintain the system in Gyeongnam; (2) present selected disease frequencies; (3) discuss the epidemiological consideration of what was done and implications for results obtained. Veterinary medical officers (VMOs), comprising professors and graduate students from Gyeongsang National University, faculty of Gyeongnam Livestock Promotion Institute and clinic veterinarians, served as data collectors. After training on current disease and management problems of dairy cattle, interview techniques, sampling methods and data-collection instruments, the VMOs participated in selection of the sample herds and data gathering. Forty (n=40) of 167 dairy herds were selected randomly using a computer-generated list of random numbers and the VMOs visited farms once in a month for 12 months to collect data about management, disease, inventory, production, preventive treatment, financial and other relevant data. Strict data-quality control devices were used. Specific feed-back was developed for the producers and data collectors. The six disorders found most frequently in cows (from the highest to the lowest) were breeding problems, clinical mastitis, birth problems, gastrointestinal problems, metabolic problems and lameness. In young stock, respiratory, multiple system, breeding and gastrointestinal problems were predominant, whereas in calves, gastrointestinal, respiratory and integumental problems predominated.

Animal Husbandry↗

Herd-level risk factors associated with Leptospira spp. seroprevalence in dairy and beef cattle in Spain.

Our aim in this cross-sectional study was to investigate the seroprevalence of Leptospira spp. infection in herds and cattle and the relationships between seroprevalence and beef versus dairy, size, replacement policy and grazing management in a representative area of beef- and dairy-cattle production in Spain. Herds were the initial sampling unit. Blood samples were collected from 762 dairy cattle belonging to 81 herds and 1238 beef cattle from 134 herds; sera were tested for antibodies against 11 serovars of Leptospira (autumnalis, ballum, bratislava, canicola, castellonis, copenhagheni, grippotyphosa, hardjo, louisiana, pomona and tarassovi) using the microagglutination test. Forty-three percent (36.2-49.5%) of the herds and 8% (6.4-8.8%) of the individuals were seropositive against one or more of the serovars studied. Bratislava was the most-prevalent serovar (24% of the herds and 4% of the individuals) followed by hardjo (11 and 1%, respectively). Grippotyphosa, copenhagheni and tarassovi were more prevalent in dairy than in beef herds (P<0.001, P<0.05, P<0.05, respectively) -- but no significant association was found between herd-size and Leptospira seroprevalence for any of the serovars considered.

Animal Husbandry↗

Comparison of nematode infections of the gastrointestinal tract in Angora and dairy goats in a rangeland environment: relations with the feeding behaviour.

A study was conducted in order to examine the possible influence of feeding behaviour on differences in the diversity and the intensity of nematode infections of the gastrointestinal tract between two breeds of goats placed in the same rangeland environment. Within the same flock bred on rangeland conditions, 10 Saanen dairy goats and 14 Angora goats were surveyed for 5 months (from May to September) and parasitological and behavioural parameters were measured. The level of nematode infection was estimated by monthly measurements of faecal egg counts whereas the feeding behaviour was assessed every fortnight. During the whole survey, nematode egg excretion was repeatedly higher in the Angora goats compared to the Saanen ones and significant differences were observed in May and September. This difference in egg excretion was related to major difference in feeding behaviour between the two breeds. In contrast with the Saanen does, Angora goats did not show any browsing and resting activities at any date of observation. Hence, Angora goats can be considered mainly as grazers whereas Saanen goats exhibit feeding activities close to browsers. The relative influence of feeding behaviour and host immune response on the susceptibility to gastrointestinal nematode infection in goats is discussed.

Animal Husbandry↗