PubMed · 10097015
Parity still isn't a generalisation problem.
Abstract
Clark & Thornton take issue with my claim that parity is not a generalisation problem, and that nothing can be inferred about back-propagation in particular, or learning in general, from failures of parity generalisation. They advance arguments to support their contention that generalisation is a relevant issue. In this continuing commentary, I examine generalisation more closely in order to refute these arguments. Different learning algorithms will have different patterns of failure: back-propagation has no special status in this respect. This is not to deny that a particular algorithm might fortuitously happen to produce the "intended" function in an (oxymoronic) parity-generalisation task.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
R I Damper. 1998. Parity still isn't a generalisation problem.. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x98211204
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.