PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10098195

Assay for chemoattractant binding.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

L Harvath, R R Aksamit, R E Cunningham. 1999. Assay for chemoattractant binding.. https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-213-9%3A299

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Simulations of chemotaxis and random motility in 2D random porous domains.

We discuss a generic computational model of eukariotic chemotaxis in 2D random porous domains. The model couples the fully time-dependent finite-difference solution of a reaction-diffusion equation for the concentration field of a chemoattractant to biased random walks representing individual chemotactic cells. We focus in particular on the influence of consumption of chemoattractant by the boundaries of obstacles with irregular shapes which are distributed randomly in the domain on the chemotactic response of the cells. Cells are stimulated to traverse a field of obstacles by a line source of chemoattractant. We find that the reactivity of the obstacle boundaries with respect to the chemoattractant strongly determines the transit time of cells through two primary mechanisms. The channeling effect arises because cells are effectively repelled from surfaces which consume chemoattractant, and opposing surfaces therefore act to keep cells in the middle of channels. This reduces traversal times relative to the case with unreactive boundaries, provided that the appropriate Péclet number relating the strength of reactivity to diffusion in governing chemoattractant transport is neither too low nor too high. The dead-zone effect arises due to a realistic threshold on the chemotactic response, which at steady state results in portions of the domain having no detectable gradient. Of these two, the channeling effect is responsible for 90% of the sensitivity of transit times to boundary reactivity. Based on these results, we speculate that it may be possible to tune the rates of cellular penetration into porous domains by engineering the reactivity of the internal surfaces to cytokines.

Chemotactic Factors↗

Purification and crystallization of the human EF-hand tumour suppressor protein S100A2.

S100A2 is a Ca(2+)-binding EF-hand protein that is mainly localized in the nucleus. There, it acts as a tumour suppressor by binding and activating p53. Wild-type S100A2 and a S100A2 variant lacking cysteines have been purified. CD spectroscopy showed that there are no changes in secondary-structure composition. The S100A2 mutant was crystallized in a calcium-free form. The crystals, with dimensions 30 x 30 x 70 microm, diffract to 1.7 A and belong to space group P2(1)2(1)2(1), with unit-cell parameters a = 43.5, b = 57.8, c = 59.8 A, alpha = beta = gamma = 90 degrees. Preliminary analysis of the X-ray data indicates that there are two subunits per asymmetric unit.

Chemotactic Factors↗

Structure-activity relationship of for-L-Met L-Leu-L-Phe-OMe analogues in human neutrophils.

Neutrophils constitute the first line of defence against bacterial invasion. They migrate to infected tissues along a concentration gradient of chemoattractant molecules, the most important of which is for-Met-Leu-Phe-OH (fMLP). Different responses arise from formylpeptides binding to different isoforms of the specific receptor. The aim of the studies reported herein was to clarify (i) the role of fMLP-OMe amide bonds in receptor-ligand cross-linking, (ii) the nature of the group occupying the N- and C-terminal positions, (iii) the features peculiar to the Met, Leu, and Phe receptor pockets, and (iv) the features which determine the specific neutrophil response.

Chemotactic Factors↗