PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10105406

Improving hospital ethics committees: testing an educational model.

Abstract

Overall, the project described in this paper appears to represent a considerable success in the field of postsecondary education, moving from the identification of a population with special educational needs to the implementation of a well-received program in a two year period. The extensive curriculum developed for the project seems to have been appreciated by participants and, in the case of relatively new members, to have improved their readiness to participate in committee work. Even in the case of more experienced HEC members, participation may have had significant, if unmeasureable, benefits. As one experienced HEC member noted, "It was a very stimulating, challenging, exhausting week and one I would recommend to others." These sentiments were echoed by another experienced participant who indicated that, "In the brochure the seminar looked like it might turn out to be the 'same old thing,' but it turned out to be a challenge and a chance to go home and begin again at a 'higher level'." Beyond its immediate benefits to individual participants, the project has led to the completion of 21 participant papers on procedural and bioethical issues, and the founding of a new journal for HEC members in which they will be published (HEC Forum, Pergamon Press, Oxford and New York). For the project faculty, the challenge ahead will be not only to respond to participant concerns, but to adapt the curriculum for presentation "on site" at hospitals across the country. While the move from formal demonstration to full-scale implementation will allow new flexibility, care must be taken to ensure that any changes do not sacrifice the program's clearly documented strengths.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R A Lusky. 1990. Improving hospital ethics committees: testing an educational model.. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00057951

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Medical science, culture, and truth.

There is a fairly closed circle between culture, language, meaning, and truth such that the world of a given culture is a world understood in terms of the meanings produced in that culture. Medicine is, in fact, a subculture of a powerful type and has its own language and understanding of the range of illnesses that affect human beings. So how does medicine get at the truth of people and their ills in such a way as to escape its own limited constructions? There is a way out of the closed circle implicit in the idea of a praxis and the engagement with reality that is central to it and the further possibility introduced by Jacques Lacan that signification is never comprehensive in relation to the subject's encounter with the real. I will explore both of these so as to develop a conception of truth that is apt for the knowledge that arises in the clinic.

Bioethical Issues↗

The practice of health care: wisdom as a model.

Reasoning and judgement in health care entail complex responses to problems whose demands typically derive from several areas of specialism at once. We argue that current evidence- or value-based models of health care reasoning, despite their virtues, are insufficient to account for responses to such problems exhaustively. At the same time, we offer reasons for contending that health professionals in fact engage in forms of reasoning of a kind described for millennia under the concept of wisdom. Wisdom traditions refer to forms of deliberation which combine knowledge, reflection and life experience with social, emotional and ethical capacities. Wisdom is key in dealing with problems which are vital to human affairs but lack prescribed solutions. Uncertainty and fluidity must be tolerated in seeking to resolve them. We illustrate the application of wisdom using cases in psychiatry, where non-technical aspects of problems are often prominent and require more systematic analysis than conventional approaches offer, but we argue that our thesis applies throughout the health care field. We argue for the relevance of a threefold model of reasoning to modern health care situations in which multifaceted teamwork and complex settings demand wise judgement. A model based on practical wisdom highlights a triadic process with features activating capacities of the self (professional), other (patient and/or carers and/or colleagues) and aspects of the problem itself. Such a framework could be used to develop current approaches to health care based on case review and experiential learning.

Bioethical Issues↗