PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10110092

Effective committees: a contradiction in terms?

Abstract

Because of the nature of committees, evaluating their effectiveness is highly subjective. The ultimate test is whether the group is able to arrive at good solutions and decisions which can be implemented. Author Robert Travis, M.B.A., looks at three actual committees, offering reasons for the success or failure of each, and then gives several pointers on creating effective committees.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R D Travis. Effective committees: a contradiction in terms?. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10110092/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

How can we increase translation of research into practice? Types of evidence needed.

This review summarizes key factors that have interfered with translation of research to practice and what public health researchers can do to hasten such transfer, focusing on characteristics of interventions, target settings, and research designs. The need to address context and to utilize research, review, and reporting practices that address external validity issues-such as designs that focus on replication, and practical clinical and behavioral trials-are emphasized. Although there has been increased emphasis on social-ecological interventions that go beyond the individual level, interventions often address each component as if it were an independent intervention. Greater attention is needed to connectedness across program levels and components. Finally, examples are provided of evaluation models and current programs that can help accelerate translation of research to practice and policy.

Decision Making, Organizational↗