PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10110927

MRI utilization model: results of a validation study.

Abstract

In 1989, the American Hospital Association (AHA) conducted a survey to assess the predictive accuracy of the second generation Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Utilization Model. Of the 172 hospitals that had purchased the AHA model in 1987, 101 (59%) responded to the survey. Half of those responding were not offering MRI services yet, 10% had decided not to offer MRI services or were undecided, and 15% were operating services for less than four months. Our results are based on a sample of 21 hospitals. The major findings of this study are: 1. The "Current Year DRG Projection" is a good predictor of early utilization of MRI. 2. The "ICD-9-CM Projection" and the "1990 DRG Projection" are indicators of full utilization of MRI or steady state. Hospitals that have more experience with the technology and an educated referral base of physicians are achieving these projections. The "ICD-9-CM Projection" could be considered a more conservative projection of full utilization and the "1990 DRG Projection" a more aggressive full utilization projection. 3. Computed tomography (CT) usage has not changed much at the current stage of MRI utilization. Applications for use of CT have expanded. 4. An emerging area for MRI is the study of the extremities. The average volume of MRI studies of the extremities performed by hospitals in our sample was about 11% of the total MRI scan volume, but the range extended from a low of 1% to a high of 20%.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S Hoppszallern. 1990. MRI utilization model: results of a validation study.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10110927/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Probability estimation when some observations are grouped.

This paper considers the use of additional questions for decreasing survey non-response rates and an approach for estimating a probability based on the results obtained. In a survey, the respondents are asked to answer an original question and follow-up questions, where the answers for the follow-up questions are grouped answers for the original question. For example, respondents are asked to provide an exact number of incidents, but in cases of 'Do not know' or 'Refuse' responses, they are subsequently asked to pick an answer from a less specific categorical scale. The new estimator obtains smaller variance asymptotically and does not depend on a distribution family. This method is applied to income questions in a survey regarding injury prevention and behaviours. Another application is survey data on intimate partner violence, where some amendments were applied for incorporating post-stratification weights and for using non-random grouping. For additional illustration, an example of parameter estimation on artificially generated data is presented.

Data Collection↗