PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 10111953

Using fourth-generation evaluation in nursing.

M M Swenson
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Evaluation is disciplined inquiry undertaken to determine the value, including merit and worth, of some entity: a curriculum program, a clinical intervention, an academic course, a care plan. An evaluation is conducted to improve or refine the thing being evaluated (evaluand) or to assess its impact and effectiveness. Evaluation in nursing has been designed using various positivistic and post-positivistic models in the first three "generations" in the evolution of evaluation practice. This article describes a new model of nursing evaluation more consistent with a nursing paradigm than with a traditional, scientific, medical paradigm. Responsive nursing evaluation informs and empowers all those involved in its outcomes (the stakeholders) when framed within the research stance called naturalistic or constructivist inquiry. The fourth-generation-evaluation approach of Guba and Lincoln (1989) is consistent with a nursing paradigm and a constructivist approach. Fourth-generation evaluation is presented with specific application to nursing evaluation.

Explore related subjects

Models, TheoreticalNursing Evaluation ResearchUnited StatesJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M M Swenson. 1991. Using fourth-generation evaluation in nursing.. https://doi.org/10.1177/016327879101400105

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2000

Photon fluence perturbation correction factors for solid state detectors irradiated in kilovoltage photon beams.

Dose perturbation correction factors, gamma(p), for LiF, CaF2 and Li2B4O7 solid state detectors have been determined using the EGS4 Monte Carlo code. Each detector was simulated in the form of a disc of diameter 3.61 mm and thickness 1 mm irradiated in a clinical kilovoltage photon beam at a depth of 1 cm in a water phantom. The perturbation correction factor gamma(p) is defined as the deviation of the absorbed dose ratio from the average mass energy absorption coefficient ratio of water to the detector material, (mu(en)/rho)med,det, which is evaluated assuming that the photon fluence spectrum in the medium and in the detector material are identical. We define another mass energy absorption coefficient ratio, (kappa(en)/rho)med,det, which is evaluated using the actual photon fluence spectrum in the medium and detector for LiF and CaF2 rather than assuming they are identical. (kappa(en)/rho)med,det predicts the average absorbed dose ratio of the medium to the detector material within 0.3%. When the difference in atomic number between the cavity and the phantom material is large then their photon fluence spectra will differ substantially resulting in a difference between (kappa(en)/rho)med,det and (mu(en)/rho)med,det. The value of gamma(p) calculated using (mu(en)/rho)med,det is up to 27% greater than unity for a cavity of CaF2 in 50 kV x-rays. When the atomic number of the medium and detector are similar, their photon fluence spectra are similar, and the difference between (kappa(en)/rho)med,det and (mu(en)/rho)med,det is small. For instance their difference for LiF is less than 2%. The average mass energy absorption coefficient ratio, (mu(en)(E)/rho)w,LiF, evaluated using the mean or representative energy, E, is up to 8% different from (mu(en)/rho)w,LiF. For calcium fluoride the difference between (mu(en)/rho)w,CaF2 and (mu(en)(E)/rho)w,CaF2 is up to 42% in the energy range studied.

Models, Theoretical↗
PubMed2000

On the equivalence of rotational and concentric therapy.

The aim of this work is to analyse the equivalence of two classes of radiation therapy. One class of therapy is characteristic of Gamma Knife type irradiations and is defined by pencil beam concentric irradiation converging on multiple centres throughout the patient's body. The other class of treatment is characteristic of accelerator based, beam intensity modulated type irradiation defined by a rotation of wide beams around a single centre. We focus our attention on deriving formulae that relate treatments in these two classes and characterize conditions under which they are valid.

Models, Theoretical↗
PubMed2000

Photon beam characterization and modelling for Monte Carlo treatment planning.

Photon beams of 4, 6 and 15 MV from Varian Clinac 2100C and 2300C/D accelerators were simulated using the EGS4/BEAM code system. The accelerators were modelled as a combination of component modules (CMs) consisting of a target, primary collimator, exit window, flattening filter, monitor chamber, secondary collimator, ring collimator, photon jaws and protection window. A full phase space file was scored directly above the upper photon jaws and analysed using beam data processing software, BEAMDP, to derive the beam characteristics, such as planar fluence, angular distribution, energy spectrum and the fractional contributions of each individual CM. A multiple-source model has been further developed to reconstruct the original phase space. Separate sources were created with accurate source intensity, energy, fluence and angular distributions for the target, primary collimator and flattening filter. Good agreement (within 2%) between the Monte Carlo calculations with the source model and those with the original phase space was achieved in the dose distributions for field sizes of 4 cm x 4 cm to 40 cm x 40 cm at source surface distances (SSDs) of 80-120 cm. The dose distributions in lung and bone heterogeneous phantoms have also been found to be in good agreement (within 2%) for 4, 6 and 15 MV photon beams for various field sizes between the Monte Carlo calculations with the source model and those with the original phase space.

Models, Theoretical↗