PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10113061

Outpatient prospective payment.

Abstract

In September of this year, the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) will present Congress with its recommendations for developing a prospective payment system for all Medicare outpatient services. Whichever plan is ultimately adopted, this system of payment will greatly impact the structure and management of outpatient services and, in particular, reimbursement for radiology services and use of technologies. While a system is perhaps at least two years away from full-scale implementation, providers are already witnessing diminishing reimbursement as a result of incremental payment changes since the early 1980's. With the across-the-board cuts of six percent for all hospital outpatient services, authorized for the first time last year by Congress, some providers are experiencing an escalation of payment short-falls. Further, if current experience with implementation of the inpatient prospective payment system is replicated in the outpatient arena, payments will not only be less but they will be dramatically different for various providers. Since implementation of DRGs, Medicare has achieved savings of $18 billion for inpatient care. While some hospitals have reported their best years financially, others are consolidating or closing. A prospective payment system for outpatients will also have such "winners and losers," but as a single policy initiative it will probably have a greater impact than both DRGs and the resource-based relative value scale (RBRVS) combined. Because fixed payments for inpatients have proliferated the push to outpatient care, a DRG-like system for outpatients will result in capping payments for the entire continuum of services provided in hospitals.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

T Matson. 1991. Outpatient prospective payment.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10113061/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The Assessment of Depression Inventory (ADI): an appraisal of validity in an outpatient sample.

In this study we examined the validity of the Assessment of Depression Inventory (ADI) using outpatient participants. The ADI Depression scale (Dep) was compared to three other measures used to assess depression: Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (ZSDS), and Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI). Correlations between the ADI and these three measures were significant. An analysis of the discriminant ability of the ADI Dep scale resulted in sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive power, negative predictive power, hit rate, and area under the curve (92.3%) that were supportive of the scale's effectiveness. The ADI Feigning scale (Fg) was compared to the six PAI validity scales. The Fg scale correlated significantly with the PAI Negative Impression Management (NIM) and Positive Impression Management (PIM) scales, and the Malingering (MAL) and Defensive (DEF) indexes. Directionality was as would be predicted. The ADI did not correlate with the two PAI validity scales derived by discriminant analysis function.

Ambulatory Care↗

How normalised is HIV care in the UK? A survey of current practice and opinion.

OBJECTIVES: The prognosis for individuals infected with HIV has changed dramatically over the past 10 years, with patients living longer and requiring other specialist services. It is apparent that access of other healthcare professionals to clinical information about a patient's HIV care differs between centres in the UK. Lack of awareness of an individual's HIV status may compromise their clinical care. AIM: To establish current practice and identify the views of clinicians caring for patients infected with HIV. METHODS: Lead consultants in all genitourinary medicine departments in the UK were invited to complete a questionnaire regarding use of combined HIV and hospital notes and ability of general practitioners and other hospital specialists to access information about individual patient's HIV care. Clinician's opinions on the "normalisation" of HIV management were also sought. RESULTS: Combined notes (outpatient and inpatient) were used by 12% (16/130) of respondents. The patient's identifying number was used to request blood tests in 86%. Of the respondents, 42% had encountered difficulties in communication that affected delivery of care for an HIV-positive patient. CONCLUSIONS: Centres using combined notes identified a higher frequency of communication with other doctors and specialties, suggesting a higher standard of care. Physicians involved in HIV care should consider combining patients' HIV and hospital notes for improved clinical care.

Ambulatory Care↗