PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10117095

Case three. Developing a strategic plan through the use of task forces.

Abstract

Although Carolina Community found itself continuing to grow and expand at a time when most facilities in the area were suffering from census declines, it was obvious that continuation of such growth would require more sophisticated strategic planning. At the time of the study, Carolina Community was growing in all areas. Inpatient census as well as outpatient utilization were taxing the resources of the organization. The strategic location of the facility and the support of a committed medical staff provided the institution with a competitive advantage over the other area facilities in the past. In the span of three months, two major competing institutions made strategically significant organizational changes. Both institutions hired new administrators known for their aggressiveness and organizational abilities. It became obvious very quickly that the playing field would soon be changing. No longer would Carolina Community's administration be able to move aggressively to protect and expand its markets without fear of competition. Carolina Community is a hospital with a long-standing tradition of formal strategic planning forced by a rapid "heating up" of the environment to respond much more quickly than it has had to in the past and much more quickly than it is currently able. The case report describes a change in strategy formulation process which was designed to speed up response time and to modify the organization along Ansoff's eight characteristics to a more environmentally appropriate configuration.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

F J DeMarco. 1990. Case three. Developing a strategic plan through the use of task forces.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10117095/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

How can we increase translation of research into practice? Types of evidence needed.

This review summarizes key factors that have interfered with translation of research to practice and what public health researchers can do to hasten such transfer, focusing on characteristics of interventions, target settings, and research designs. The need to address context and to utilize research, review, and reporting practices that address external validity issues-such as designs that focus on replication, and practical clinical and behavioral trials-are emphasized. Although there has been increased emphasis on social-ecological interventions that go beyond the individual level, interventions often address each component as if it were an independent intervention. Greater attention is needed to connectedness across program levels and components. Finally, examples are provided of evaluation models and current programs that can help accelerate translation of research to practice and policy.

Decision Making, Organizational↗